[Bug ld/12451] --build-id doesn't work
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12451 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amodra at gmail dot com --- Comment #6 from Alan Modra 2012-06-15 03:40:28 UTC --- For anyone rummaging through bugzilla, please note the followup: http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2011-12/msg00074.html -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/14243] software that includes bfd.h fails to build with "#error config.h must be included before this header"
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14243 Mike Frysinger changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vapier at gentoo dot org --- Comment #3 from Mike Frysinger 2012-06-15 03:08:30 UTC --- we do compile with HAVE_CONFIG_H which many files respect, but last time i tried to increase usage of this define, i was shot down ... -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/14072] Incorrect handling of config.h and/or sysdep.h causing problems
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14072 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amodra at gmail dot com --- Comment #11 from Alan Modra 2012-06-15 02:19:24 UTC --- See #14243 re oprofile. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/14243] software that includes bfd.h fails to build with "#error config.h must be included before this header"
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14243 --- Comment #2 from Alan Modra 2012-06-15 02:14:04 UTC --- A further comment. I see HAVE_STRINGIZE is obsolescent according to the autoconf docs. So my argument for config.h being included before the current version of bfd.h isn't really that strong. However, it is a really good idea to always include config.h (or sysdep.h or alloca-conf.h that include config.h) before any other files, including system headers. See bug #13558. Beside all that, I can't see the binutils project reverting this change. Yes, it causes some initial pain (and I grumbled about the change myself), but overall the change is a good one. If you (oprofile project) want to insulate yourself from a change like this one, then you really should be distributing your own copy of bfd along with oprofile sources. That would allow you to resolve these issues at your leisure. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/14243] software that includes bfd.h fails to build with "#error config.h must be included before this header"
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14243 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||amodra at gmail dot com Resolution||WONTFIX --- Comment #1 from Alan Modra 2012-06-15 00:33:54 UTC --- This is a correctness issue. bfd.h and the headers that bfd.h #include test at least one HAVE_* macro. So you need to include the file that defines those HAVE_* macros before bfd.h. You may argue that the use of HAVE_STRINGSIZE will never affect any host that builds oprofile. While that may be true, it's still a correctness issue. Future versions of bfd.h may test other HAVE_* macros. This isn't about requiring any of the various binutils config.h files, but rather *an* autoconf generated config.h. It's completely irrelevant that opagent.c itself does not need config.h. opagent.c *and its headers* needs config.h. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/14243] New: software that includes bfd.h fails to build with "#error config.h must be included before this header"
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14243 Bug #: 14243 Summary: software that includes bfd.h fails to build with "#error config.h must be included before this header" Product: binutils Version: 2.23 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P2 Component: binutils AssignedTo: unassig...@sourceware.org ReportedBy: mayna...@us.ibm.com Classification: Unclassified A build of the oprofile package against a June 12, 2012 CVS snapshot of binutils fails with the following: make[2]: Entering directory `/home/cseo/at5.0/at5.0-5/src/oprofile/libopagent' /bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile /opt/at5.0-5-rc1/bin/gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I/home/cseo/at5.0/at5.0-5/src/oprofile/libopagent -fPIC -I /home/cseo/at5.0/at5.0-5/src/oprofile/libop -I /home/cseo/at5.0/at5.0-5/src/oprofile/libutil -g -MT libopagent_la-opagent.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/libopagent_la-opagent.Tpo -c -o libopagent_la-opagent.lo `test -f 'opagent.c' || echo '/home/cseo/at5.0/at5.0-5/src/oprofile/libopagent/'`opagent.c libtool: compile: /opt/at5.0-5-rc1/bin/gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I/home/cseo/at5.0/at5.0-5/src/oprofile/libopagent -fPIC -I /home/cseo/at5.0/at5.0-5/src/oprofile/libop -I /home/cseo/at5.0/at5.0-5/src/oprofile/libutil -g -MT libopagent_la-opagent.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/libopagent_la-opagent.Tpo -c opagent.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/libopagent_la-opagent.o In file included from opagent.c:63:0: /opt/at5.0-5-rc1/include/bfd.h:37:2: error: #error config.h must be included before this header make[2]: Entering directory `/home/cseo/at5.0/at5.0-5/src/oprofile/libopagent' /bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile /opt/at5.0-5-rc1/bin/gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I/home/cseo/at5.0/at5.0-5/src/oprofile/libopagent -fPIC -I /home/cseo/at5.0/at5.0-5/src/oprofile/libop -I /home/cseo/at5.0/at5.0-5/src/oprofile/libutil -g -MT libopagent_la-opagent.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/libopagent_la-opagent.Tpo -c -o libopagent_la-opagent.lo `test -f 'opagent.c' || echo '/home/cseo/at5.0/at5.0-5/src/oprofile/libopagent/'`opagent.c libtool: compile: /opt/at5.0-5-rc1/bin/gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I/home/cseo/at5.0/at5.0-5/src/oprofile/libopagent -fPIC -I /home/cseo/at5.0/at5.0-5/src/oprofile/libop -I /home/cseo/at5.0/at5.0-5/src/oprofile/libutil -g -MT libopagent_la-opagent.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/libopagent_la-opagent.Tpo -c opagent.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/libopagent_la-opagent.o In file included from opagent.c:63:0: /opt/at5.0-5-rc1/include/bfd.h:37:2: error: #error config.h must be included before this header This failure is apparently related to the binutils change that went in via bug # 14072. This change apparently enforces that any file that includes "bfd.h" also includes "config.h". As I understand it, this change was intended for binutils source files only since the "config.h" file being required is binutils' config.h. Yet the change is improperly requiring external software to also include a "config.h" before including bfd.h. For the case in question, oprofile's opagent.c does not include the oprofile's config.h and does not require it. While we *could* hack opagent.c (and several other oprofile files that include bfd.h) to unnecessarily include oprofile's config.h, this seems to be the wrong fix to this problem. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/14072] Incorrect handling of config.h and/or sysdep.h causing problems
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14072 Pawel Sikora changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pluto at agmk dot net --- Comment #10 from Pawel Sikora 2012-06-14 18:25:35 UTC --- include guard in breaks e.g. oprofile build. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/14234] /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lz collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14234 Paul Pluzhnikov changed: What|Removed |Added Status|SUSPENDED |RESOLVED CC||ppluzhnikov at google dot ||com Resolution||INVALID --- Comment #2 from Paul Pluzhnikov 2012-06-14 14:25:36 UTC --- User error. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/14234] /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lz collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14234 pdemil+bug at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |SUSPENDED --- Comment #1 from pdemil+bug at gmail dot com 2012-06-14 13:08:44 UTC --- apt-get install libghc-zlib-dev did the trick -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/14234] New: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lz collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14234 Bug #: 14234 Summary: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lz collect2: ld returned 1 exit status Product: binutils Version: 2.22 Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ld AssignedTo: unassig...@sourceware.org ReportedBy: pdemil+...@gmail.com Classification: Unclassified I'm want to use http://sourceforge.net/projects/mspgcc/files/mspgcc/DEVEL-4.7.x/ mspgcc-20120606 I have patched and compiled binutils and gcc succesfully (bin in /usr/local/msp430/bin but the msp430-ld is not used in the compilation of gdb) Next, I have to patch, configure and compile gdb. Following the instructions in msp430-gdb-7.2a-20111205.patch tar xjf gdb-7.2a.tar.bz2 ( cd gdb-7.2 ; patch -p1 < ../msp430-gdb-7.2a-20111205.patch ) mkdir -p BUILD/gdb cd BUILD/gdb ../../gdb-7.2/configure \ --target=msp430 \ --prefix=/usr/local/msp430 \ 2>&1 | tee co make 2>&1 | tee mo output make: ... make[2]: Entering directory `/root/downloads/BUILD/gdb/sim' make[3]: Entering directory `/root/downloads/BUILD/gdb/sim/msp430' gcc ../../../../gdb-7.2/sim/msp430/../common/gentmap.c -o gentmap -g -O -I. -I../../../../gdb-7.2/sim/msp430 -I../common -I../../../../gdb-7.2/sim/msp430/../common -I../../include -I../../../../gdb-7.2/sim/msp430/../../include -I../../bfd -I../../../../gdb-7.2/sim/msp430/../../bfd -I../../opcodes -I../../../../gdb-7.2/sim/msp430/../../opcodes rm -f tmp-tvals.h tmp-tmap.c ./gentmap -h >tmp-tvals.h /bin/bash ../../../../gdb-7.2/sim/msp430/../../move-if-change tmp-tvals.h targ-vals.h ./gentmap -c >tmp-tmap.c /bin/bash ../../../../gdb-7.2/sim/msp430/../../move-if-change tmp-tmap.c targ-map.c touch stamp-tvals rm -f version.c-tmp version.c echo '#include "version.h"' >> version.c-tmp echo 'const char version[] = "'"`sed q ../../../../gdb-7.2/sim/msp430/../../gdb/version.in`"'";' >> version.c-tmp mv version.c-tmp version.c gcc -c -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DPROFILE=1 -DWITH_PROFILE=-1 -DDEFAULT_INLINE=0 -I. -I../../../../gdb-7.2/sim/msp430 -I../common -I../../../../gdb-7.2/sim/msp430/../common -I../../include -I../../../../gdb-7.2/sim/msp430/../../include -I../../bfd -I../../../../gdb-7.2/sim/msp430/../../bfd -I../../opcodes -I../../../../gdb-7.2/sim/msp430/../../opcodes -g -O2 version.c rm -f libsim.a ar rc libsim.a callback.o syscall.o targ-map.o version.o interp.o sim-load.o ranlib libsim.a gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DPROFILE=1 -DWITH_PROFILE=-1 -DDEFAULT_INLINE=0 -I. -I../../../../gdb-7.2/sim/msp430 -I../common -I../../../../gdb-7.2/sim/msp430/../common -I../../include -I../../../../gdb-7.2/sim/msp430/../../include -I../../bfd -I../../../../gdb-7.2/sim/msp430/../../bfd -I../../opcodes -I../../../../gdb-7.2/sim/msp430/../../opcodes -g -O2 -o run \ run.o libsim.a ../../bfd/libbfd.a ../../opcodes/libopcodes.a ../../libiberty/libiberty.a -lnsl -lm -lz /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lz collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[3]: *** [run] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/root/downloads/BUILD/gdb/sim/msp430' make[2]: *** [all] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/root/downloads/BUILD/gdb/sim' make[1]: *** [all-sim] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/root/downloads/BUILD/gdb' make: *** [all] Error 2 Extra info: OS: ubuntu 12.04 Linux ubuntu 3.2.0-24-generic #37-Ubuntu SMP Wed Apr 25 08:43:22 UTC 2012 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux root@ubuntu:~/downloads/BUILD/gdb# /usr/bin/ld --version GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Ubuntu) 2.22 Copyright 2011 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This program is free software; you may redistribute it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 3 or (at your option) a later version. This program has absolutely no warranty. I don't think that msp430-ld should be used for compiling the patched gdb. root@ubuntu:~/downloads/BUILD/gdb# msp430-ld --version GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.22 (mspgcc dev 20120606) Copyright 2011 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This program is free software; you may redistribute it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 3 or (at your option) a later version. This program has absolutely no warranty. root@ubuntu:~/downloads/BUILD/gdb# root@ubuntu:~/downloads/BUILD/gdb# env $PATH env: /usr/gcc_4_7/bin:/usr/local/msp430/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games: No such file or directory root@ubuntu:~/downloads/BUILD/gdb# Any hints? -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
