[Bug gold/14309] New: gold doesn't build with gcc 4.1.3
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14309 Bug #: 14309 Summary: gold doesn't build with gcc 4.1.3 Product: binutils Version: unspecified Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gold AssignedTo: i...@airs.com ReportedBy: ja...@redhat.com CC: ccout...@google.com Classification: Unclassified gold/README says: The gold source code uses templates heavily. Building it requires a recent version of g++. g++ 4.0.3 and 4.1.3 are known to work. g++ 3.2, 3.4.3, and 4.1.2 are known to fail. and I used to be able to build 2.22.52.0.1 just fine with gcc-4.1.2-RH (which is based on 137441 of FSF branches/gcc-4_1-branch (no libstdc++ changes on that branch after that revision). But 2.22.52.0.4 no longer builds with it: /usr/lib/gcc/i386-redhat-linux/4.1.2/../../../../include/c++/4.1.2/tr1/hashtable: In instantiation of 'Internal::hash_code_baselong long int, std::pairconst long long int, gold::Gdb_index_info_reader::Declaration_pair, Internal::extract1ststd::pairconst long long int, gold::Gdb_index_info_reader::Declaration_pair , std::equal_tolong long int, std::tr1::hashlong long int, Internal::mod_range_hashing, Internal::default_ranged_hash, false': /usr/lib/gcc/i386-redhat-linux/4.1.2/../../../../include/c++/4.1.2/tr1/hashtable:1014: instantiated from 'std::tr1::hashtablelong long int, std::pairconst long long int, gold::Gdb_index_info_reader::Declaration_pair, std::allocatorstd::pairconst long long int, gold::Gdb_index_info_reader::Declaration_pair , Internal::extract1ststd::pairconst long long int, gold::Gdb_index_info_reader::Declaration_pair , std::equal_tolong long int, std::tr1::hashlong long int, Internal::mod_range_hashing, Internal::default_ranged_hash, Internal::prime_rehash_policy, false, false, true' /usr/lib/gcc/i386-redhat-linux/4.1.2/../../../../include/c++/4.1.2/tr1/unordered_map:63: instantiated from 'std::tr1::unordered_maplong long int, gold::Gdb_index_info_reader::Declaration_pair, std::tr1::hashlong long int, std::equal_tolong long int, std::allocatorstd::pairconst long long int, gold::Gdb_index_info_reader::Declaration_pair , false' gdb-index.cc:292: instantiated from here /usr/lib/gcc/i386-redhat-linux/4.1.2/../../../../include/c++/4.1.2/tr1/hashtable:863: error: 'Internal::hash_code_baseKey, Value, ExtractKey, Equal, H1, H2, Internal::default_ranged_hash, false::m_h1' has incomplete type /usr/lib/gcc/i386-redhat-linux/4.1.2/../../../../include/c++/4.1.2/tr1/functional:1101: error: declaration of 'struct std::tr1::hashlong long int' gdb-index.cc: In constructor 'std::tr1::unordered_mapKey, T, Hash, Pred, Alloc, cache_hash_code::unordered_map(typename std::tr1::hashtableKey, std::pairconst Key, T, Alloc, Internal::extract1ststd::pairconst Key, T , Pred, Hash, Internal::mod_range_hashing, Internal::default_ranged_hash, Internal::prime_rehash_policy, cache_hash_code, false, true::size_type, const typename std::tr1::hashtableKey, std::pairconst Key, T, Alloc, Internal::extract1ststd::pairconst Key, T , Pred, Hash, Internal::mod_range_hashing, Internal::default_ranged_hash, Internal::prime_rehash_policy, cache_hash_code, false, true::hasher, const typename std::tr1::hashtableKey, std::pairconst Key, T, Alloc, Internal::extract1ststd::pairconst Key, T , Pred, Hash, Internal::mod_range_hashing, Internal::default_ranged_hash, Internal::prime_rehash_policy, cache_hash_code, false, true::key_equal, const typename std::tr1::hashtableKey, std::pairconst Key, T, Alloc, Internal::extract1ststd::pairconst Key, T , Pred, Hash, Internal::mod_range_hashing, Internal::default_ranged_hash, Internal::prime_rehash_policy, cache_hash_code, false, true::allocator_type) [with Key = long long int, T = gold::Gdb_index_info_reader::Declaration_pair, Hash = std::tr1::hashlong long int, Pred = std::equal_tolong long int, Alloc = std::allocatorstd::pairconst long long int, gold::Gdb_index_info_reader::Declaration_pair , bool cache_hash_code = false]': gdb-index.cc:189: error: invalid use of undefined type 'struct std::tr1::hashlong long int' /usr/lib/gcc/i386-redhat-linux/4.1.2/../../../../include/c++/4.1.2/tr1/functional:1101: error: declaration of 'struct std::tr1::hashlong long int' /usr/lib/gcc/i386-redhat-linux/4.1.2/../../../../include/c++/4.1.2/tr1/hashtable: In member function 'size_t Internal::hash_code_baseKey, Value, ExtractKey, Equal, H1, H2, Internal::default_ranged_hash, false::m_hash_code(const Key) const [with Key = long long int, Value = std::pairconst long long int, gold::Gdb_index_info_reader::Declaration_pair, ExtractKey = Internal::extract1ststd::pairconst long long int, gold::Gdb_index_info_reader::Declaration_pair , Equal = std::equal_tolong long int, H1 = std::tr1::hashlong long int, H2 = Internal::mod_range_hashing]': /usr/lib/gcc/i386-redhat-linux/4.1.2/../../../../include/c++/4.1.2/tr1/hashtable:1541: instantiated from 'typename
[Bug binutils/14302] ar mishandles 4GB files
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14302 Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||nickc at redhat dot com Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #5 from Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com 2012-06-29 13:02:52 UTC --- Hi Francois, Thanks for the bug report and patch, and please accept my apologies in getting round to reviewing it. The patch itself is fine, although there are a couple of places where a comment needs to be updated, and a couple of places where there are now redundant type cases. I have taken care of both of these things and applied your patch. Cheers Nick -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/14302] ar mishandles 4GB files
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14302 --- Comment #4 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-29 12:59:54 UTC --- CVSROOT:/cvs/src Module name:src Changes by:ni...@sourceware.org2012-06-29 12:59:49 Modified files: binutils : ChangeLog ar.c bucomm.c Log message: PR binutils/14302 * bucomm.c (print_arelt_descr): Correctly report the archive size field (for 'ar tv'). * ar.c (print_contents): Use correct types for archive element sizes (for 'ar p'). (extract_file): Likewise (for 'ar x'). Patches: http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/binutils/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=srcr1=1.1918r2=1.1919 http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/binutils/ar.c.diff?cvsroot=srcr1=1.84r2=1.85 http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/binutils/bucomm.c.diff?cvsroot=srcr1=1.45r2=1.46 -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/14189] --gc-sections doesn't work
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14189 --- Comment #5 from Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com 2012-06-29 13:23:13 UTC --- Created attachment 6496 -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=6496 Do not increment refcount for locally bound symbols. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/14189] --gc-sections doesn't work
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14189 Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING CC||nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment #6 from Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com 2012-06-29 13:26:16 UTC --- Hi Michael, Hi Ronald, Please could you try out the uploaded patch and let me know if it works for you ? Cheers Nick -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
gas patch for non-octet processors
The attached patches correct an issue that exists in gas. The problem is
general but only manifests itself when OCTETS_PER_BYTE 1. I have found
the problem in binutils 2.22 in connection with TI C4x (i.e. ./configure
--target=c4x-coff).
Function frag_offset_fixed_p in frags.[ch] returns an offset through its
last parameter. The parameter type is bfd_vma which is unsigned. The only
calls to the function are in expr.c; the offset is returned to local
variables frag_off which are also of type bfd_vma. The variables frag_off
are divided by OCTETS_PER_BYTE; the problem is that these divisions are
unsigned as a result of the use of bfd_vma. Dividing these offsets must be
done signed. No actual division takes place when OCTETS_PER_BYTE = 1 so
this problem only manifests itself when OCTETS_PER_BYTE 1.
These uses of bfd_vma are the only ones in the three sources expr.c,
frags.c, frags.h. I believe all these uses of bfd_vma should be changed to
offsetT. This will be more consistent with the definitions of the struct
members used in frag_offset_fixed_p and the fact that the returned value
is supposed to be an offset; it also makes the divisions produce the
correct values when OCTETS_PER_BYTE 1.
Please consider these patches for future binutils releases. The revisions
of the original expr.c, frags.c, and frags.h are respectively 1.90,
1.30.2.1, and 1.24.4.1.
Thanks,
Johan Olmutz Nielsen
--- expr.1.90.c 2011-03-17 11:59:29.0 +0100
+++ expr.c 2012-06-22 12:33:40.531010600 +0200
@@ -1746,7 +1746,7 @@
while (op_left != O_illegal op_rank[(int) op_left] rank)
{
segT rightseg;
- bfd_vma frag_off;
+ offsetT frag_off;
input_line_pointer += op_chars; /* - after operator. */
@@ -2030,7 +2030,7 @@
valueT left, right;
segT seg_left, seg_right;
fragS *frag_left, *frag_right;
- bfd_vma frag_off;
+ offsetT frag_off;
switch (op)
{
--- frags.1.30.2.1.c2011-11-21 10:29:28.0 +0100
+++ frags.c 2012-06-22 12:23:46.886766700 +0200
@@ -394,10 +394,10 @@
not already accounted for in the frag FR_ADDRESS. */
bfd_boolean
-frag_offset_fixed_p (const fragS *frag1, const fragS *frag2, bfd_vma
*offset)
+frag_offset_fixed_p (const fragS *frag1, const fragS *frag2, offsetT
*offset)
{
const fragS *frag;
- bfd_vma off;
+ offsetT off;
/* Start with offset initialised to difference between the two frags.
Prior to assigning frag addresses this will be zero. */
--- frags.1.24.4.1.h2011-11-21 10:29:28.0 +0100
+++ frags.h 2012-06-22 12:23:02.655089200 +0200
@@ -151,6 +151,6 @@
offsetT offset,
char *opcode);
-bfd_boolean frag_offset_fixed_p (const fragS *, const fragS *, bfd_vma
*);
+bfd_boolean frag_offset_fixed_p (const fragS *, const fragS *, offsetT
*);
#endif /* FRAGS_H */
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/14189] --gc-sections doesn't work
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14189 --- Comment #7 from Michael Tremer michael.tremer at ipfire dot org 2012-06-29 14:59:46 UTC --- Hi Nick, I can confirm that the patch fixes the problem over here. The build of systemd runs through without any assertion errors. Thank you very much. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/14263] »val« may be used uninitialized in this function tc-arm.c parse_operands()
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14263 --- Comment #3 from Michael Bruck bruck.michael at googlemail dot com 2012-06-29 15:00:39 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) Hi Michael, I am unable to reproduce this problem locally, but the fix seems obvious. Please could you confirm that the uploaded patch allows you to build the toolchain and if it does then I will check it in. Cheers Nick Yes, this fixes it. (Same change I made to get around it.) -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/14263] »val« may be used uninitialized in this function tc-arm.c parse_operands()
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14263 --- Comment #4 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-29 15:15:53 UTC --- CVSROOT:/cvs/src Module name:src Changes by:ni...@sourceware.org2012-06-29 15:15:48 Modified files: gas: ChangeLog gas/config : tc-arm.c Log message: PR gas/14263 * config/tc-arm.c (parse_operands): Initialise val. Patches: http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/gas/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=srcr1=1.4759r2=1.4760 http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/gas/config/tc-arm.c.diff?cvsroot=srcr1=1.521r2=1.522 -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/14263] »val« may be used uninitialized in this function tc-arm.c parse_operands()
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14263 Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #4 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-29 15:15:53 UTC --- CVSROOT:/cvs/src Module name:src Changes by:ni...@sourceware.org2012-06-29 15:15:48 Modified files: gas: ChangeLog gas/config : tc-arm.c Log message: PR gas/14263 * config/tc-arm.c (parse_operands): Initialise val. Patches: http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/gas/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=srcr1=1.4759r2=1.4760 http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/gas/config/tc-arm.c.diff?cvsroot=srcr1=1.521r2=1.522 --- Comment #5 from Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com 2012-06-29 15:16:39 UTC --- Patch applied. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/14263] »val« may be used uninitialized in this function tc-arm.c parse_operands()
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14263 Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #5 from Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com 2012-06-29 15:16:39 UTC --- Patch applied. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/14189] --gc-sections doesn't work
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14189 --- Comment #8 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-29 15:20:44 UTC --- CVSROOT:/cvs/src Module name:src Changes by:ni...@sourceware.org2012-06-29 15:20:31 Modified files: bfd: ChangeLog elf32-arm.c Log message: PR ld/14189 * elf32-arm.c (elf32_arm_check_relocs): Do not increment refcount for locally bound symbols. Patches: http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/bfd/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=srcr1=1.5737r2=1.5738 http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/bfd/elf32-arm.c.diff?cvsroot=srcr1=1.295r2=1.296 -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/14189] --gc-sections doesn't work
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14189 Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #8 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-29 15:20:44 UTC --- CVSROOT:/cvs/src Module name:src Changes by:ni...@sourceware.org2012-06-29 15:20:31 Modified files: bfd: ChangeLog elf32-arm.c Log message: PR ld/14189 * elf32-arm.c (elf32_arm_check_relocs): Do not increment refcount for locally bound symbols. Patches: http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/bfd/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=srcr1=1.5737r2=1.5738 http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/bfd/elf32-arm.c.diff?cvsroot=srcr1=1.295r2=1.296 --- Comment #9 from Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com 2012-06-29 15:21:53 UTC --- Patch applied. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/14189] --gc-sections doesn't work
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14189 Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #9 from Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com 2012-06-29 15:21:53 UTC --- Patch applied. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/14189] --gc-sections doesn't work
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14189 --- Comment #10 from Ronald Wahl ronald.wahl at raritan dot com 2012-06-29 15:31:57 UTC --- The patch works here as well. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/14315] New: Inconsistent .weak and .comm directives
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14315 Bug #: 14315 Summary: Inconsistent .weak and .comm directives Product: binutils Version: 2.23 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gas AssignedTo: unassig...@sourceware.org ReportedBy: hjl.to...@gmail.com Classification: Unclassified [hjl@gnu-6 secondary-1]$ cat w1.s .weak foobar .comm foobar,30 [hjl@gnu-6 secondary-1]$ make w1.o ./as -o w1.o w1.s [hjl@gnu-6 secondary-1]$ cat w2.s .comm foobar,30 .weak foobar [hjl@gnu-6 secondary-1]$ make w2.o ./as -o w2.o w2.s w2.s: Assembler messages: w2.s: Error: symbol `foobar' can not be both weak and common make: *** [w2.o] Error 1 [hjl@gnu-6 secondary-1]$ -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/14315] Inconsistent .weak and .comm directives
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14315
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-06-30 00:34:13
UTC ---
This works for me:
diff --git a/gas/config/obj-elf.c b/gas/config/obj-elf.c
index f9da1ee..08d337a 100644
--- a/gas/config/obj-elf.c
+++ b/gas/config/obj-elf.c
@@ -350,6 +350,11 @@ elf_common_parse (int ignore ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED, symbolS
*symbolP, addressT size)
}
}
+ /* Double check weak symbols. */
+ if (S_IS_WEAK (symbolP))
+as_bad (_(symbol `%s' can not be both weak and common),
+S_GET_NAME (symbolP));
+
if (is_local)
{
bss_alloc (symbolP, size, align);
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/14302] ar mishandles 4GB files
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14302 --- Comment #6 from Francois Gouget fgouget at codeweavers dot com 2012-06-30 00:54:00 UTC --- Thanks for tweaking the patch so it could be committed. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gold/14316] New: gold build failure with recent GCC trunk because of -Werror=unused-local-typedefs
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14316 Bug #: 14316 Summary: gold build failure with recent GCC trunk because of -Werror=unused-local-typedefs Product: binutils Version: unspecified Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gold AssignedTo: i...@airs.com ReportedBy: ai.az...@gmail.com CC: ccout...@google.com Classification: Unclassified Recently, GCC has introduced a new kind of warning flags `-Werror=unused-local-typedefs' (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33255), which warns about unused local typedefs. And since GCC 4.8 (2012-05-04) it is enabled by `-Wall'. So, warnings are treated as errors during the build of gold because some of gold sources have unused local typedefs, and `-Wall' and `-Werror' are enabled. Offending lines (of 2012-06-29 daily snapshot) are -gold/common.cc, line 225 -gold/common.cc, line 226 -gold/dwarf_reader.cc, line 824 -gold/ehframe.cc, line 634 -gold/incremental.cc, line 2731 -gold/powerpc.cc, line 1974 -gold/arm.cc, line 3256 -gold/arm.cc, line 5212 -gold/arm.cc, line 10993 If all the offending lines are just commented out, gold is successfully built. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
