[Bug gold/18106] error: TLS relocation against invalid instruction
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18106 --- Comment #5 from Cary Coutant --- Created attachment 8204 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8204&action=edit Proposed gold patch HJ, can you try this patch? I think it should work, but I'm at home right now, and my Ubuntu VM doesn't have 32-bit libraries. The non-SIB form of lea;call;nop was listed as a FIXME, and thus resulted in the "invalid instruction" error. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gold/18106] error: TLS relocation against invalid instruction
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18106 --- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Cary Coutant from comment #5) > Created attachment 8204 [details] > Proposed gold patch > > HJ, can you try this patch? I think it should work, but I'm at home right > now, and my Ubuntu VM doesn't have 32-bit libraries. The non-SIB form of > lea;call;nop was listed as a FIXME, and thus resulted in the "invalid > instruction" error. It linked and generated working executable. Thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gold/18106] error: TLS relocation against invalid instruction
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18106 --- Comment #7 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Cary Coutant : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=152f702439a34bf20b74f472695490edb42ad56f commit 152f702439a34bf20b74f472695490edb42ad56f Author: Cary Coutant Date: Sun Mar 22 11:59:21 2015 -0700 Fix support for i386 TLS GD-to-IE optimization. There are two cases to support, one with an SIB-form (6-byte) LEA, the other with a 5-byte LEA and a NOP after the call __tls_get_addr. Gold did not yet support the second case. This patch adds that support. gold/ PR gold/18106 * i386.cc (Target_i386::Relocate::tls_gd_to_ie): Fix support for non-SIB form of lea, with nop after the call. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gold/18106] error: TLS relocation against invalid instruction
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18106 Cary Coutant changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #8 from Cary Coutant --- Fixed on trunk. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gold/18147] gold should not issue relocation overflow error with --unresolved-symbols=ignore-all
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18147 --- Comment #5 from Alan Modra --- It might be reasonable to not report relocation overflow for strong undefined symbols, but I don't think that a linker should ignore all weak undefined symbol overflow. For example, this if (foo) foo (); should report overflows in any relocation used to implement "if (foo)". Normally of course any relocations involved are absolute and zero works fine in an absolute relocation, but suppose a pc-relative address calculation is used to implement "if (foo)". That might overflow when foo is undefined if you use -Ttext (or have an extremely large binary). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
