[Bug binutils/18374] readelf fails to dump debug_loc
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18374 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #1) Created attachment 8316 [details] Detect relocs against addresses in .debug_loc sections Hi H.J. The problem here is that the although readelf has processed the relocs against the .debug_loc section, the processed values are not valid. (The reolcs involved were offsets from the .text section symbol, but since the section has not been placed into memory yet, the relocs were resolving to zero). The uploaded patch fixes the problem by refusing to accept an end-of-list pair of addresses when relocs exist against them. Do you have any comments on the patch before I apply it ? Can you extract/add a testcase from this bug report? Thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/18374] readelf fails to dump debug_loc
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18374 Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment #1 from Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com --- Created attachment 8316 -- https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8316action=edit Detect relocs against addresses in .debug_loc sections Hi H.J. The problem here is that the although readelf has processed the relocs against the .debug_loc section, the processed values are not valid. (The reolcs involved were offsets from the .text section symbol, but since the section has not been placed into memory yet, the relocs were resolving to zero). The uploaded patch fixes the problem by refusing to accept an end-of-list pair of addresses when relocs exist against them. Do you have any comments on the patch before I apply it ? Cheers Nick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/17840] [2.25 Regression] ar creates archives with incorrect LST system_id and magic
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17840 --- Comment #3 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 2015-01-13, at 7:18 PM, amodra at gmail dot com wrote: I'll bet that building with --disable-plugins cures this problem The problem is plugins.m4 sets maybe_plugins=yes based on the presence of dlfcn.h. However, this header is not applicable to 32-bit hpux targets (only 64-bit). dlopen is only available on hppa64. Dave -- John David Anglin dave.ang...@bell.net -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/18276] AArch64: readelf, gas do not support TLSLD relocations
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18276 Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment #1 from Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com --- Hi Jing, What is the specification for these relocs ? What is the definition of the assembler syntax to support them ? Cheers Nick PS. Please could you upload the .s and .o files from compiling your testcase so that we can use them to check the behaviour of any patched versions of gas and readelf that we create. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/18314] On ARM, data gets confused for instructions after .align directive
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18314 Solra Bizna solrabizna at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #2 from Solra Bizna solrabizna at gmail dot com --- Binutils from git correctly handles all of my test cases. I believe this is now fixed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/18414] TOC optimization bug (ignoring data deps on addis/ld - nop/ld opt)
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18414 --- Comment #5 from Hal Finkel hfinkel at anl dot gov --- (In reply to Alan Modra from comment #4) Hmm, the dependency on r2 was added to gcc 2012-05-21. Which means that people using an older gcc with a newer ld are in trouble. There needs to be some way for ld to detect older gcc code, other than code scanning which is unreliable and slow. And no, ld does not currently scan code to find the second instruction. The pairing is by the relocations. Hrmm, good point. What happens to the .ident strings? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
