[Bug gas/18427] GNU as slow on hppa architecture
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18427 Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/18427] GNU as slow on hppa architecture
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18427 Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment #3 from Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com --- Created attachment 8336 -- https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8336action=edit Extended patch Hi Guys, I dislike the idea of disabling code that might actually be needed in some circumstances. So how about this alternative patch ? It extends David's patch by adding a command line option: --enable-multi-seg-support. If this option is used the old, slow, searching code is used. Otherwise the default action is to use the new, faster search code. What do you think, will this work ? Cheers Nick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/18451] Inefficient .strtab implementation
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18451 Jevin Sweval jsweval at arxan dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jsweval at arxan dot com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/18427] GNU as slow on hppa architecture
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18427 --- Comment #4 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 2015-05-29 12:20 PM, nickc at redhat dot com wrote: I dislike the idea of disabling code that might actually be needed in some circumstances. So how about this alternative patch ? It extends David's patch by adding a command line option: --enable-multi-seg-support. If this option is used the old, slow, searching code is used. Otherwise the default action is to use the new, faster search code. Hi Nick, Thanks for helping with this change. I'm not sure about the option. Alpha has somewhat similar code without an option. As I understand it, this code is to handle a number of instructions which require a preceding label. It usually emitted on the previous line. It seems to me that changing segments between the label and its related instruction should be an error. I don't think this feature is needed even for the HP-UX SOM target. I will check whether GCC needs this for SOM. Dave -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
