https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18427
--- Comment #5 from Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com ---
Hi Dave,
Thanks for helping with this change.
I'm not sure about the option. Alpha has somewhat similar code without
an option.
As I understand it, this code is to handle a number of instructions
which require a preceding
label. It usually emitted on the previous line. It seems to me that
changing segments between
the label and its related instruction should be an error. I don't think
this feature is needed
even for the HP-UX SOM target.
I will check whether GCC needs this for SOM.
OK - thanks. If you can confirm that support for this behaviour is no
longer needed then I will be happy to go with the simpler patch. (Or
maybe the simpler one + an error message if the preceding label cannot
be found). I just did not want to break anybody's builds because of a
speed optimization,
Cheers
Nick
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils