[Bug ld/19579] [Regression] link error linking fortran code with PIE

2016-03-03 Thread krebbel at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19579

Andreas Krebbel  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|WAITING |NEW

--- Comment #13 from Andreas Krebbel  ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #12)
> Created attachment 9061 [details]
> A new patch

Problem is fixed on s390 with this patch. Thanks!

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug gold/19019] [SPARC64] Only registers %g[2367] can be declared using STT_REGISTER when linking against libsystemd

2016-03-03 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19019

--- Comment #21 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org  ---
The master branch has been updated by Cary Coutant :

https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=dc1c8a16a38dec431c77f49cf50a9b62d6366138

commit dc1c8a16a38dec431c77f49cf50a9b62d6366138
Author: Cary Coutant 
Date:   Thu Feb 4 16:55:39 2016 -0800

Add support for STT_SPARC_REGISTER symbols.

gold/
PR gold/19019
* layout.h (Layout::add_target_specific_dynamic_tag): New function.
* layout.cc (Layout::add_target_specific_dynamic_tag): New function.
* mips.cc (Target_mips::make_symbol): Adjust function signature.
* sparc.cc (Target_sparc::Target_sparc): Initialize register_syms_.
(Target_sparc::do_is_defined_by_abi): Remove test for
STT_SPARC_REGISTER.
(Target_sparc::Register_symbol): New struct type.
(Target_sparc::register_syms_): New data member.
(Target_sparc<64, true>::sparc_info): Set has_make_symbol to true.
(Target_sparc::make_symbol): New function.
(Target_sparc::do_finalize_sections): Add register symbols and new
dynamic table entries.
* symtab.h (Sized_symbol::init_undefined): Add value parameter.
(Symbol_table::add_target_global_symbol): New function.
(Symbol_table::target_symbols_): New data member.
* symtab.cc (Sized_symbol::init_undefined): Add value parameter.
(Symbol_table::Symbol_table): Initialize target_symbols_.
(Symbol_table::add_from_object): Pass additional parameters to
Target::make_symbol.
(Symbol_table::define_special_symbol): Likewise.
(Symbol_table::add_undefined_symbol_from_command_line): Pass 0 for
undefined symbol value.
(Symbol_table::set_dynsym_indexes): Process target-specific symbols.
(Symbol_table::sized_finalize): Likewise.
(Symbol_table::sized_write_globals): Likewise.
* target.h (Sized_target::make_symbol): Add name, st_type, object,
st_shndx, and value parameters.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug gold/19751] Gold failed to build with GCC 6

2016-03-03 Thread ccoutant at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19751

Cary Coutant  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Attachment #9055|0   |1
is obsolete||

--- Comment #2 from Cary Coutant  ---
Created attachment 9062
  --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9062=edit
Add ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED where needed.

HJ, please try this patch and see if it silences the warnings. I'd prefer to
leave these functions defined.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug ld/13406] version script: please allow anonymous tag to be combined with other tags

2016-03-03 Thread sbergman at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13406

--- Comment #9 from Stephan Bergmann  ---
(The original problem had been solved in LibreOffice with

"fdo#42865: privatized unique empty string symbol," i.e., adding
_ZNSs4_Rep20_S_empty_rep_storageE to the version maps in a section named
GLIBCXX_3.4, the same section libstdc++ weakly exports it in.)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils