[Bug binutils/20464] hppa-linux-gnu-ranlib: libcpp.a: File format not recognized

2016-08-15 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net 
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20464

--- Comment #6 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2016-08-14, at 7:39 PM, amodra at gmail dot com wrote:

> How was the failing binutils configured?

This is Debian bug #834253:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=834253

The error only occurs with binutils-multiarch installed.

--
John David Anglin   dave.ang...@bell.net

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug ld/20472] [2.27 Regression] glibc-2.24 fails to build with the 2.7 branch on powerpc64-linux-gnu

2016-08-15 Thread amodra at gmail dot com 
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20472

Alan Modra  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Target|powerpc-linux-gnu   |powerpc64-linux-gnu
 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org   |amodra at gmail dot com
Summary|[2.27 Regression]   |[2.27 Regression]
   |glibc-2.24 fails to build   |glibc-2.24 fails to build
   |with the 2.7 branch on  |with the 2.7 branch on
   |powerpc-linux-gnu   |powerpc64-linux-gnu

--- Comment #2 from Alan Modra  ---
Confirmed.  I was concerned enough about this change to build both gcc and
glibc on powerpc64 and powerpc64le, as I've been bitten with this sort of
change before.  However the machine I used to build the powerpc64 glibc was
running an old kernel, so the testsuite gave lots of "FATAL: kernel too old"
messages and I obviously didn't check the testsuite output carefully enough. 
My glibc build had the same failure..

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug binutils/20464] hppa-linux-gnu-ranlib: libcpp.a: File format not recognized

2016-08-15 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net 
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20464

--- Comment #5 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
> How was the failing binutils configured?  Please attach an example of an
> archive showing the failure.


Attached example.

--
John David Anglin   dave.ang...@bell.net

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug ld/20472] [2.27 Regression] glibc-2.24 fails to build with the 2.7 branch on powerpc-linux-gnu

2016-08-15 Thread ppluzhnikov at google dot com 
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20472

Paul Pluzhnikov  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|[2.27 Regression]   |[2.27 Regression]
   |glibc-2.24 fails to build   |glibc-2.24 fails to build
   |with the 2.7 brnach on  |with the 2.7 branch on
   |powerpc-linux-gnu   |powerpc-linux-gnu

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug ld/20472] [2.27 Regression] glibc-2.24 fails to build with the 2.7 brnach on powerpc-linux-gnu

2016-08-15 Thread doko at debian dot org 
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20472

--- Comment #1 from Matthias Klose  ---
Created attachment 9436
  --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9436=edit
test case

test case, taken from https://bugs.debian.org/834445

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug ld/20471] [2.27 Regression] ld test failures on powerpc-linux-gnu

2016-08-15 Thread doko at debian dot org 
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20471

Matthias Klose  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||amodra at gmail dot com

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug ld/20472] [2.27 Regression] glibc-2.24 fails to build with the 2.7 brnach on powerpc-linux-gnu

2016-08-15 Thread doko at debian dot org 
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20472

Matthias Klose  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Target||powerpc-linux-gnu
 CC||amodra at gmail dot com

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug ld/20472] New: [2.27 Regression] glibc-2.24 fails to build with the 2.7 brnach on powerpc-linux-gnu

2016-08-15 Thread doko at debian dot org 
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20472

Bug ID: 20472
   Summary: [2.27 Regression] glibc-2.24 fails to build with the
2.7 brnach on powerpc-linux-gnu
   Product: binutils
   Version: 2.27
Status: NEW
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P2
 Component: ld
  Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
  Reporter: doko at debian dot org
  Target Milestone: ---

with today's 2.27 branch, glibc-2.24 fails to build on powerpc-linux-gnu,
worked with the 2.27 release. The only powerpc related change is:

2016-08-11  Alan Modra  

   * elf64-ppc.c (ppc64_elf_adjust_dynamic_symbol): Don't exit with
   non_got_ref true in any case where we could have generated dynbss
   copies but decide not to do so.

The failure is

BFD (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.27 internal error, aborting at
../../bfd/elf64-ppc.c:14834 in ppc64_elf_relocate_section
/usr/bin/ld: Please report this bug.
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status

I don't have more information yet.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug ld/20471] [2.27 Regression] ld test failures on powerpc-linux-gnu

2016-08-15 Thread doko at debian dot org 
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20471

Matthias Klose  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Target||powerpc-linux-gnu

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug ld/20471] New: [2.27 Regression] ld test failures on powerpc-linux-gnu

2016-08-15 Thread doko at debian dot org 
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20471

Bug ID: 20471
   Summary: [2.27 Regression] ld test failures on
powerpc-linux-gnu
   Product: binutils
   Version: 2.27
Status: NEW
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P2
 Component: ld
  Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
  Reporter: doko at debian dot org
  Target Milestone: ---

seen with the 2.27 release:

on powerpc-linux-gnu:
Running /«PKGBUILDDIR»/ld/testsuite/ld-elf/shared.exp ...
FAIL: Run with pr11138-2.c libpr11138-1.so
FAIL: Run with libpr11138-1.so pr11138-2.c

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug binutils/20464] hppa-linux-gnu-ranlib: libcpp.a: File format not recognized

2016-08-15 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net 
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20464

--- Comment #4 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2016-08-14 7:39 PM, amodra at gmail dot com wrote:
> How was the failing binutils configured?  Please attach an example of an
> archive showing the failure.
Here is a Debian build log:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=binutils=hppa=2.27-5=1471006182

Will attach archive when I get home this evening.  I also see failure 
with simpler configuration.

With "objdump -a", I see that the objects in the archive are all 
elf32-hppa as expected.

Dave

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils