[Bug ld/16044] BFD (GNU Binutils) 2.23.2 assertion fail elf32-cris.c:2732
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16044 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |2.29 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/16044] BFD (GNU Binutils) 2.23.2 assertion fail elf32-cris.c:2732
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16044 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #17 from Hans-Peter Nilsson --- (In reply to wbx from comment #16) > works great. Thanks. Great. Thanks again for your patience. > Might be a candidate for 2.28 stable branch :) Agreed and that request was indeed made in the message to the mailing list, with CC to the release manager, whose acceptance I believe is required post-release. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/16044] BFD (GNU Binutils) 2.23.2 assertion fail elf32-cris.c:2732
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16044 --- Comment #16 from wbx at openadk dot org --- works great. Thanks. Might be a candidate for 2.28 stable branch :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/21303] [powerpc] objdump doesn't show e200z4 specific instructions
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21303 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|--- |2.29 --- Comment #4 from Alan Modra --- Fixed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/16044] BFD (GNU Binutils) 2.23.2 assertion fail elf32-cris.c:2732
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16044 --- Comment #15 from Hans-Peter Nilsson --- A link to the commit is available above and the reporter CC:ed on the message to the mailing list. Reporter, while I have no doubt that the issue s fully fixed, I await your confirmation before closing the issue. Observation: readelf says the DSO after the patch is identical to that of just deleting the annoying assert. :) The test-case I added is not known to make a difference in that regard; I just followed the observations from following the original case. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/16044] BFD (GNU Binutils) 2.23.2 assertion fail elf32-cris.c:2732
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16044 --- Comment #14 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Hans-Peter Nilsson : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=086554e8e6b222518f12acab34e6cc7b5af7fde7 commit 086554e8e6b222518f12acab34e6cc7b5af7fde7 Author: Hans-Peter Nilsson Date: Tue Mar 28 23:43:09 2017 +0200 Fix for PR ld/16044: elf32-cris.c h->plt.refcount inconsistency -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/18025] dwarf2 debug info after rebasing DLLs unusable
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18025 --- Comment #16 from Jon Turney --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #14) > The problem, I believe, is not the line number lookup code, but rather the > bias computation code. This is performing a linear scan of the symbol table > for every functional unit. Yes. > Please could you try out the uploaded patch. I found that with this applied > the "nm -l" scan of the cygstdc++6.dll took just 15 seconds, which I hope is > fast enough. Thanks very much for looking at this. This seems to work and is at least 10,000 times faster! Awesome :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/18025] dwarf2 debug info after rebasing DLLs unusable
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18025 --- Comment #15 from Nick Clifton --- Created attachment 9953 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9953&action=edit Proposed patch -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/18025] dwarf2 debug info after rebasing DLLs unusable
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18025 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED |--- --- Comment #14 from Nick Clifton --- Hi Jon, The problem, I believe, is not the line number lookup code, but rather the bias computation code. This is performing a linear scan of the symbol table for every functional unit. Please could you try out the uploaded patch. I found that with this applied the "nm -l" scan of the cygstdc++6.dll took just 15 seconds, which I hope is fast enough. Cheers Nick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
