[Bug ld/21569] [avr] Make avr.sc so generic that there is no need for avrtiny.sc.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21569 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |2.29 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/21569] [avr] Make avr.sc so generic that there is no need for avrtiny.sc.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21569 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #3 from Georg-Johann Lay --- Done. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/21532] AArch64: Symbol address inconsistency across compilation units
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21532 Jiong Wang changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #11 from Jiong Wang --- Mark as fixed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/21532] AArch64: Symbol address inconsistency across compilation units
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21532 --- Comment #10 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Jiong Wang : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=6353d82b8fa825c2143f41e84b0d5d4446c6e99a commit 6353d82b8fa825c2143f41e84b0d5d4446c6e99a Author: Jiong Wang Date: Thu Jun 15 16:51:01 2017 +0100 [AArch64] Allow COPY relocation elimination As discussed at the PR, this patch tries to avoid COPY relocation generation and propagate the original relocation into runtime if it was relocating on writable section. The ELIMINATE_COPY_RELOCS has been set to true and it's underlying infrastructure has been improved so that the COPY reloc elimination at least working on absoluate relocations (ABS64) on AArch64. BFD linker copy relocation elimination framwork requires the backend to always allocate dynrelocs for all those relocation types that are possible to introduce copy relocations. This is for adjust_dynamic_symbol hook to be able to get all symbol reference information. Should one symbol is referenced by more than one relocations, if there is any of them needs copy relocation then linker should generate it. bfd/ PR ld/21532 * elfnn-aarch64.c (ELIMINATE_COPY_RELOCS): Set to 1. (elfNN_aarch64_final_link_relocate): Also propagate relocations to runtime for if there needs copy relocation elimination. (need_copy_relocation_p): New function. Return true for symbol with pc-relative references and if it's against read-only sections. (elfNN_aarch64_adjust_dynamic_symbol): Use need_copy_relocation_p. (elfNN_aarch64_check_relocs): Allocate dynrelocs for relocation types that are related with accessing external objects. (elfNN_aarch64_gc_sweep_hook): Sync the relocation types with the change in elfNN_aarch64_check_relocs. ld/ * testsuite/ld-aarch64/copy-reloc-exe-2.s: New test source file. * testsuite/ld-aarch64/copy-reloc-2.d: New test. * testsuite/ld-aarch64/copy-reloc-exe-eliminate.s: New test source file. * testsuite/ld-aarch64/copy-reloc-eliminate.d: New test. * testsuite/ld-aarch64/copy-reloc-so.s: Define new global objects. * testsuite/ld-aarch64/aarch64-elf.exp: Run new tests. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/21594] global-buffer-overflow in OP_G
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21594 --- Comment #4 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=8cac017d35ef374e65acc98818a17cf8a652cbd0 commit 8cac017d35ef374e65acc98818a17cf8a652cbd0 Author: H.J. Lu Date: Thu Jun 15 08:21:48 2017 -0700 i386-dis: Add 2 tests with invalid bnd register PR binutils/21594 * testsuite/gas/i386/mpx.s: Add 2 tests with invalid bnd register. * testsuite/gas/i386/x86-64-mpx.s: Likewise. * testsuite/gas/i386/mpx.d: Updated. * testsuite/gas/i386/x86-64-mpx.d: Likewise. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/21594] global-buffer-overflow in OP_G
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21594 --- Comment #3 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=0d96e4df4812c3bad77c229dfef47a9bc115ac12 commit 0d96e4df4812c3bad77c229dfef47a9bc115ac12 Author: H.J. Lu Date: Thu Jun 15 06:40:17 2017 -0700 i386-dis: Check valid bnd register Since there are only 4 bnd registers, return "(bad)" for register number > 3. PR binutils/21594 * i386-dis.c (OP_E_register): Check valid bnd register. (OP_G): Likewise. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/21595] global-buffer-overflow in aarch64_ext_ldst_reglist
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21595 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC||nickc at redhat dot com Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #4 from Nick Clifton --- Hi Aadamski, Thanks for reporting this bug. This was a simple case of a missing range check when decoding the LDST instruction, so I have checked in a small patch to fix it. Cheers Nick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/21595] global-buffer-overflow in aarch64_ext_ldst_reglist
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21595 --- Comment #3 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=cd3ea7c69acc5045eb28f9bf80d923116e15e4f5 commit cd3ea7c69acc5045eb28f9bf80d923116e15e4f5 Author: Nick Clifton Date: Thu Jun 15 13:26:54 2017 +0100 Prevent address violation problem when disassembling corrupt aarch64 binary. PR binutils/21595 * aarch64-dis.c (aarch64_ext_ldst_reglist): Check for an out of range value. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/21581] stack-buffer-overflow in bfd_get_string
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21581 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC||nickc at redhat dot com Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #6 from Nick Clifton --- Hi Aadamski, Thanks for reporting this bug. The problem is the same as PR 21582 except that it is happening in the archive handling part of the IEEE scanning code. I have checked in a similar fix. Cheers Nick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/21581] stack-buffer-overflow in bfd_get_string
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21581 --- Comment #5 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=62b76e4b6e0b4cb5b3e0053d1de4097b32577049 commit 62b76e4b6e0b4cb5b3e0053d1de4097b32577049 Author: Nick Clifton Date: Thu Jun 15 13:08:47 2017 +0100 Fix address violation parsing a corrupt ieee binary. PR binutils/21581 (ieee_archive_p): Use a static buffer to avoid compiler bugs. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/21582] stack-buffer-overflow in ieee_object_p
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21582 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #8 from Nick Clifton --- Hi Aadamski, Thanks for the confirmation - patch applied. Cheers Nick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/21582] stack-buffer-overflow in ieee_object_p
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21582 --- Comment #7 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=63634bb4a107877dd08b6282e28e11cfd1a1649e commit 63634bb4a107877dd08b6282e28e11cfd1a1649e Author: Nick Clifton Date: Thu Jun 15 12:44:23 2017 +0100 Avoid a possible compiler bug by using a static buffer instead of a stack local buffer. PR binutils/21582 * ieee.c (ieee_object_p): Use a static buffer to avoid compiler bugs. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/21588] stack-buffer-overflow in rl78_decode_opcode
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21588 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC||nickc at redhat dot com Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #5 from Nick Clifton --- Hi Aadamski, Thanks for reporting this bug. The problem this time was an overrun of the buffer used to contain RL78 opcodes. I have added a simple overflow check, so the problem should now be resolved. Cheers Nick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/21588] stack-buffer-overflow in rl78_decode_opcode
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21588 --- Comment #4 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=63323b5b23bd83fa7b04ea00dff593c933e9b0e3 commit 63323b5b23bd83fa7b04ea00dff593c933e9b0e3 Author: Nick Clifton Date: Thu Jun 15 12:37:01 2017 +0100 Fix address violation when disassembling a corrupt RL78 binary. PR binutils/21588 * rl78-decode.opc (OP_BUF_LEN): Define. (GETBYTE): Check for the index exceeding OP_BUF_LEN. (rl78_decode_opcode): Use OP_BUF_LEN as the length of the op_buf array. * rl78-decode.c: Regenerate. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/21577] global-buffer-overflow in print_insn_score32
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21577 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment #4 from Nick Clifton --- Hi Aadamski, I could not reproduce this failure. Please could you check again to see if it is still present ? I suspect that one of the recent patches to fix the other problems you detected may have fixed this problem as well. Cheers Nick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/21579] heap-buffer-overflow in _bfd_hexdump
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21579 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC||nickc at redhat dot com Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #5 from Nick Clifton --- Hi Adamski, Thanks for reporting this bug. It turns out that in was very similar to 21589, and the fix is almost identical. Cheers Nick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/21579] heap-buffer-overflow in _bfd_hexdump
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21579 --- Comment #4 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=76800cba595efc3fe95a446c2d664e42ae4ee869 commit 76800cba595efc3fe95a446c2d664e42ae4ee869 Author: Nick Clifton Date: Thu Jun 15 12:08:57 2017 +0100 Handle EITR records in VMS Alpha binaries with overlarge command length parameters. PR binutils/21579 * vms-alpha.c (_bfd_vms_slurp_etir): Extend check of cmd_length. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/21586] global-buffer-overflow in decode_pseudodbg_assert_0
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21586 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC||nickc at redhat dot com Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #7 from Nick Clifton --- Hi Aadamski, Thanks for reporting this bug. The first testcase (5ddfa) has already been fixed by a previous patch. (I did not check to find out which one, but it will have been a recent one). The second testcase (eaa0e) does trigger the fault you reported and I have checked in a patch to fix the cause - an invalid array access. Cheers Nick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/21586] global-buffer-overflow in decode_pseudodbg_assert_0
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21586 --- Comment #6 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=08c7881b814c546efc3996fd1decdf0877f7a779 commit 08c7881b814c546efc3996fd1decdf0877f7a779 Author: Nick Clifton Date: Thu Jun 15 11:52:02 2017 +0100 Prevent invalid array accesses when disassembling a corrupt bfin binary. PR binutils/21586 * bfin-dis.c (gregs): Clip index to prevent overflow. (regs): Likewise. (regs_lo): Likewise. (regs_hi): Likewise. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/21582] stack-buffer-overflow in ieee_object_p
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21582 --- Comment #6 from aadamski at quarkslab dot com --- Sounds like it's fixed for me! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
