[Bug binutils/22793] New: Reachable assertion in find_section (src/binutils/readelf.c)
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22793
Bug ID: 22793
Summary: Reachable assertion in find_section
(src/binutils/readelf.c)
Product: binutils
Version: 2.30
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: binutils
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: probefuzzer at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
On version 2.30.51.20180206 and master branch of binutils:
there is a reachable assertion in the find_section function of
(src/binutils/readelf.c), which could be triggered by the following POC.
The assertion statement is:
653 static Elf_Internal_Shdr *
654 find_section (Filedata * filedata, const char * name) {
658 assert (filedata->section_headers != NULL);
664 return NULL;
665 }
readelf: binutils/master/src/binutils/readelf.c:658: find_section: Assertion
`filedata->section_headers != ((void *)0)' failed.
./repro: line 54: 175376 Aborted $CMD
To reproduce the issue, run: ./bin/readelf -a $POC
POC:
https://github.com/ProbeFuzzer/poc/blob/master/binutils/binutils_2-30-51_readelf_reachable-assertion_find_section
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/22794] New: Unchecked strnlen operation in bfd_get_debug_link_info_1 (./src/bfd/opncls.c)
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22794
Bug ID: 22794
Summary: Unchecked strnlen operation in
bfd_get_debug_link_info_1 (./src/bfd/opncls.c)
Product: binutils
Version: 2.30
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: binutils
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: probefuzzer at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
(this issue is discovered when UBSAN is enabled)
On version 2.30.51.20180206 and master branch of binutils:
there is an unchecked strnlen operation, which could be triggered by the POC
below.
As shown in line 1201, the first parameter ("name") of strnlen could be
manipulated by the input file. When "name" is NULL and the second parameter is
larger than NULL, the program would fail with segmentation fault.
1174 static char *
1175 bfd_get_debug_link_info_1 (bfd *abfd, void *crc32_out)
1176 {
1199 name = (char *) contents;
1200 /* PR 17597: avoid reading off the end of the buffer. */
1201 crc_offset = strnlen (name, bfd_get_section_size (sect)) + 1;
1202 crc_offset = (crc_offset + 3) & ~3;
1208 }
./src/bfd/opncls.c:1201:16: runtime error: null pointer passed as argument 1,
which is declared to never be null
To reproduce the issue, run: ./bin/nm -A -a -l -S -s --special-syms --synthetic
--with-symbol-versions -D $POC
POC:
https://github.com/ProbeFuzzer/poc/blob/master/binutils/binutils_2-30-51_nm_unchecked_strlen_bfd_get_debug_link_info_1
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
Reachable assertion in find_section (src/binutils/readelf.c)
On version 2.30.51.20180206 and master branch of binutils:
there is a reachable assertion in the find_section function of
(src/binutils/readelf.c), which could be triggered by the following POC.
The assertion statement is:
653 static Elf_Internal_Shdr *
654 find_section (Filedata * filedata, const char * name) {
658 assert (filedata->section_headers != NULL);
664 return NULL;
665 }
readelf: binutils/master/src/binutils/readelf.c:658: find_section:
Assertion `filedata->section_headers != ((void *)0)' failed.
./repro: line 54: 175376 Aborted $CMD
To reproduce the issue, run: ./bin/readelf -a $POC
POC:
https://github.com/ProbeFuzzer/poc/blob/master/binutils/binutils_2-30-51_readelf_reachable-assertion_find_section
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gold/22791] Don't error when a -pie executable uses a shared function without PIC/PIE relocation
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22791 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com --- Comment #12 from H.J. Lu --- Since there is no need to prepare for PLT branch on x86-64, we can treat PC32 relocation with branch as PLT32 relocation. I posted a patch for ld: https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2018-02/msg00065.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/22794] Unchecked strnlen operation in bfd_get_debug_link_info_1 (./src/bfd/opncls.c)
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22794 --- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=64e234d417d5685a4aec0edc618114d9991c031b commit 64e234d417d5685a4aec0edc618114d9991c031b Author: Nick Clifton Date: Tue Feb 6 15:48:29 2018 + Prevent attempts to call strncpy with a zero-length field by chacking the size of debuglink sections. PR 22794 * opncls.c (bfd_get_debug_link_info_1): Check the size of the section before attempting to read it in. (bfd_get_alt_debug_link_info): Likewise. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/22794] Unchecked strnlen operation in bfd_get_debug_link_info_1 (./src/bfd/opncls.c)
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22794 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC||nickc at redhat dot com Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #2 from Nick Clifton --- Thanks for reporting this bug. I have applied a small patch to check the size of the debuglink sections before attempting to load their contents. Cheers Nick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/22771] nm does not display line information for uninlined copies of functions
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22771 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC||nickc at redhat dot com Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #2 from Nick Clifton --- Patch applied: https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2018-02/msg00053.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/22793] Reachable assertion in find_section (src/binutils/readelf.c)
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22793 --- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=68807c3cd64ccc4f0e9261df3e840d30d9a19b51 commit 68807c3cd64ccc4f0e9261df3e840d30d9a19b51 Author: Nick Clifton Date: Tue Feb 6 16:05:13 2018 + Replace reachable assertion with a test and return of NULL. PR 22793 * readelf.c (find_section): Replace assertion with test and return of NULL. (find_section_by_address): Add test of section header table existance. (find_section_by_type): Likewise. (find_section_in_set): Likewise. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/22793] Reachable assertion in find_section (src/binutils/readelf.c)
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22793 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC||nickc at redhat dot com Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #2 from Nick Clifton --- Thanks for the bug report. I have replaced the assertion with a test and return of NULL, which allows readelf to fully process the test file you supplied. I also added a couple more tests to similar functions, just in case they are needed. Cheers Nick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/22789] addr2line can't determine function names in mips binaries compiled with -gline-tables-only
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22789 --- Comment #2 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=46d09186d340407fdcf066fea25444682e989512 commit 46d09186d340407fdcf066fea25444682e989512 Author: Nick Clifton Date: Tue Feb 6 17:00:25 2018 + Improve the find_nearest_line function for the MIPS target so that it tries harder to find a function name. PR 22789 * elfxx-mips.c (_bfd_mips_elf_find_nearest_line): If the dwarf functions failed to find the function name, try the generic elf find function instead. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/22788] AddressSanitizer: SEGV /home/ubuntu/binutils/binutils_git/binutils-gdb/bfd/libbfd.c:558 bfd_getl32
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22788 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment #1 from Nick Clifton --- Created attachment 10792 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10792&action=edit Proposed patch Hi JayZhang, Thanks for reporting this bug. I am unable to reproduce the actual failure, but I think that this is because I cannot build a 32-bit toolchain with address sanitization enabled. (This is a failure with my build environment not the binutils). In the meantime though, please could you try out the uploaded patch and let me know if it fixes the problem. Thanks. Cheers Nick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/22789] addr2line can't determine function names in mips binaries compiled with -gline-tables-only
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22789 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC||nickc at redhat dot com Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #3 from Nick Clifton --- Hi Miloš, Thanks for the bug report and patch. I have checked in a slightly extended version of your patch, that also checks for the filename not having been found, and also handles the case where either of the return pointers are NULL. Cheers Nick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/22263] -fpie -pie generates dynamic relocations in text section
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22263 --- Comment #15 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Eric Botcazou : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=c20c30f615756ddfccc4bb75c65ccfc1a399466e commit c20c30f615756ddfccc4bb75c65ccfc1a399466e Author: Eric Botcazou Date: Tue Feb 6 18:15:56 2018 +0100 Fix PR ld/22263 on SPARC. This is -fpie -pie generating dynamic relocations in the text section, simply because no TLS transitions are applied in PIE mode. The meat of the patch is to turn calls to bfd_link_pic (info) in TLS-related code into !bfd_link_executable (info) and there are quite a lot of them... bfd/ * elfxx-sparc.c (sparc_elf_tls_transition): Turn call to bfd_link_pic into call to !bfd_link_executable and tidy up. (_bfd_sparc_elf_check_relocs): Fix formatting and tidy up. : Turn call to bfd_link_pic into call to !bfd_link_executable. : Likewise. : Remove useless code, tidy and merge blocks. : Turn call to bfd_link_pic into call to !bfd_link_executable. : Tidy up. (_bfd_sparc_elf_gc_mark_hook): Turn call to bfd_link_pic into call to !bfd_link_executable. (allocate_dynrelocs): Likewise. (_bfd_sparc_elf_relocate_section): Fix formatting and tidy up. : Merge into... : ...this. Adjust 4th argument in call to sparc_elf_tls_transition and remove redundant code. : Turn call to bfd_link_pic into call to !bfd_link_executable. : Likewise. : Likewise. Tidy up. : Likewise. : Likewise. Tidy up. : Likewise. : Likewise. : Likewise. : Likewise. ld/ * testsuite/ld-elf/tls.exp (AFLAGS_PIC): Define on SPARC. (pr22263-1): Pass AFLAGS_PIC to the assembler. * testsuite/ld-sparc/tlspie32.s: Add test for other 3 transitions. * testsuite/ld-sparc/tlspie32.dd: Adjust to above. * testsuite/ld-sparc/tlspie64.s: Add test for other 3 transitions. * testsuite/ld-sparc/tlspie64.dd: Adjust to above. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/22712] Stack Overflow (71959517)
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22712 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC||nickc at redhat dot com Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #1 from Nick Clifton --- Hi Google-Autofuzz, Thanks very much for reporting this problem. Unfortunately bugs in the libiberty library, including the C++ name demangler, should be reported to the GCC project and not the binutils. (https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/enter_bug.cgi?product=gcc component = demangler). The libiberty library is used by the binutils project, but it is not owned by it. We try to keep the sources in the binutils repository in sync with the sources in the gcc repository, but there is no formal process for doing this. So sometimes it may happen that a bug has been fixed in the gcc sources, but the patch has not yet been imported into the binutils sources. If you find that this is the case, please do let us know so that we can fix the problem. Cheers Nick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/22710] Signed Integer Overflow (71889280)
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22710 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC||nickc at redhat dot com Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #1 from Nick Clifton --- Hi Google-Autofuzz, Thanks very much for reporting this problem. Unfortunately bugs in the libiberty library, including the C++ name demangler, should be reported to the GCC project and not the binutils. (https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/enter_bug.cgi?product=gcc component = demangler). The libiberty library is used by the binutils project, but it is not owned by it. We try to keep the sources in the binutils repository in sync with the sources in the gcc repository, but there is no formal process for doing this. So sometimes it may happen that a bug has been fixed in the gcc sources, but the patch has not yet been imported into the binutils sources. If you find that this is the case, please do let us know so that we can fix the problem. Cheers Nick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/22706] bfd/elf32-sh.c fails asserts without additional information: sh4-unknown-linux-gnu-ld: BFD assertion fail bfd/elf32-sh.c:5171
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22706 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment #1 from Nick Clifton --- Hi Sergei, Is there any chance that you could upload a reproducible testcase (object files + libraries + linker command line). This would make investigating the problem a lot easier. Cheers Nick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gold/22791] Don't error when a -pie executable uses a shared function without PIC/PIE relocation
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22791 --- Comment #13 from Cary Coutant --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #12) > Since there is no need to prepare for PLT branch on x86-64, we can treat > PC32 relocation with branch as PLT32 relocation. I posted a patch for ld: > > https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2018-02/msg00065.html What do you mean by "prepare for PLT branch"? It looks like your patch examines the opcode(s) preceding the relocated value to determine whether it's a branch or not. How is this safe? It seems fragile to me. In addition, it requires the linker to read section contents while scanning relocations, which is not normally necessary, and will slow the linker down significantly -- we normally don't need to read most sections' contents until it's time to apply relocations. If your argument is that you can always treat PC32 relocations on branches as if they were PLT32 relocations, why not just have the compiler emit PLT32 relocations in the first place? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gold/22791] Don't error when a -pie executable uses a shared function without PIC/PIE relocation
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22791 --- Comment #14 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Cary Coutant from comment #13) > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #12) > > Since there is no need to prepare for PLT branch on x86-64, we can treat > > PC32 relocation with branch as PLT32 relocation. I posted a patch for ld: > > > > https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2018-02/msg00065.html > > What do you mean by "prepare for PLT branch"? On i386, there are 2 types of PLTs, PIC and non-PIC. PIE and shared objects must use PIC PLT. To use PIC PLT, you need to load _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ into EBX first. There is no need for that on x86-64. > It looks like your patch examines the opcode(s) preceding the relocated > value to determine whether it's a branch or not. How is this safe? It seems > fragile to me. In addition, it requires the linker to read section contents > while scanning relocations, which is not normally necessary, and will slow > the linker down significantly -- we normally don't need to read most > sections' contents until it's time to apply relocations. > > If your argument is that you can always treat PC32 relocations on branches > as if they were PLT32 relocations, why not just have the compiler emit PLT32 > relocations in the first place? Yes, this patch does that: https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2018-02/msg00074.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22799 Bug ID: 22799 Summary: Contact 1(844) 601-4333 Amazon Echo Customer Service Phone Number^&* Product: binutils Version: 2.31 (HEAD) Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: critical Priority: P2 Component: admin Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: sdsadas at inboxbear dot com Target Milestone: --- https://www.amazon.com/ideas/amzn1.account.AHGEZV4DVDERQITELBLDAWNBEH5A/3DAM7UPQFBJX9 https://www.amazon.com/ideas/amzn1.account.AHGEZV4DVDERQITELBLDAWNBEH5A/3DAM7UPQFBJX9 https://www.amazon.com/ideas/amzn1.account.AHGEZV4DVDERQITELBLDAWNBEH5A/3DAM7UPQFBJX9 https://www.amazon.com/ideas/amzn1.account.AHGEZV4DVDERQITELBLDAWNBEH5A/3DAM7UPQFBJX9 https://www.amazon.com/ideas/amzn1.account.AHGEZV4DVDERQITELBLDAWNBEH5A/3DAM7UPQFBJX9 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/22802] New: massive performance regression for `readelf -n`
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22802 Bug ID: 22802 Summary: massive performance regression for `readelf -n` Product: binutils Version: unspecified Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: robert at ocallahan dot org Target Milestone: --- `readelf -n /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/libwebkit2gtk-4.0.so.37.13.10.debug` takes 0.006s in 2.29-6.fc27. It takes 58s in 2.29.51 (built from gdb-8.1-release). Transcript: [roc@glory code]$ /usr/bin/readelf --version GNU readelf version 2.29-6.fc27 Copyright (C) 2017 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This program is free software; you may redistribute it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 3 or (at your option) any later version. This program has absolutely no warranty. [roc@glory code]$ time /usr/bin/readelf -n /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/libwebkit2gtk-4.0.so.37.13.10.debug Displaying notes found in: .note.gnu.build-id Owner Data size Description GNU 0x0014 NT_GNU_BUILD_ID (unique build ID bitstring) Build ID: 0607995fe748bcac5e22ed63835154bcf58173cb Displaying notes found in: .note.gnu.gold-version Owner Data size Description GNU 0x0009 NT_GNU_GOLD_VERSION (gold version) Version: gold 1.11 real0m0.006s user0m0.001s sys 0m0.001s [roc@glory binutils-gdb]$ readelf --version GNU readelf (GNU Binutils) 2.29.51 Copyright (C) 2018 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This program is free software; you may redistribute it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 3 or (at your option) any later version. This program has absolutely no warranty. [roc@glory binutils-gdb]$ time readelf -n /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/libwebkit2gtk-4.0.so.37.13.10.debug Displaying notes found in: .note.gnu.build-id Owner Data size Description GNU 0x0014 NT_GNU_BUILD_ID (unique build ID bitstring) Build ID: 0607995fe748bcac5e22ed63835154bcf58173cb Displaying notes found in: .note.gnu.gold-version Owner Data size Description GNU 0x0009 NT_GNU_GOLD_VERSION (gold version) Version: gold 1.11 real0m57.550s user0m54.845s sys 0m1.227s -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug admin/22803] New: setapai １~８００~２０１~２８９８ amazon Alexa customer support number @@@ amazon Alexa support phone number!
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22803 Bug ID: 22803 Summary: setapai １~８００~２０１~２８９８amazon Alexa customer support number @@@ amazon Alexa support phone number! Product: binutils Version: unspecified Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: admin Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: buluryn at wmail dot club Target Milestone: --- https://www.amazon.com/ideas/amzn1.account.AGJ3IM7HK66BIHSOK5TT4BWSQKYQ/21EKIXYQJK7DZ https://www.amazon.com/ideas/amzn1.account.AEWPAD5V6T7GRH2MYJ3H7Q5ZHVHQ/3EAEWSPXPGBII https://www.amazon.com/ideas/amzn1.account.AGJ3IM7HK66BIHSOK5TT4BWSQKYQ/3UR48O4K4NFN2 https://www.amazon.com/ideas/amzn1.account.AEWPAD5V6T7GRH2MYJ3H7Q5ZHVHQ/38CWI9JL3IBXZ https://www.amazon.com/ideas/amzn1.account.AGQKXY47Z54HSUPCRCMQCTH6M75A/3BRLD4AJ29XBT https://www.amazon.com/ideas/amzn1.account.AE6B4QRANYC57GP5IPKPFRPMJRRQ/1VO7W881GD77H https://www.amazon.com/ideas/amzn1.account.AE6B4QRANYC57GP5IPKPFRPMJRRQ/2HR66E4CXE5KQ https://www.amazon.com/ideas/amzn1.account.AGQKXY47Z54HSUPCRCMQCTH6M75A/3JX54RWK1UA82 https://www.amazon.com/ideas/amzn1.account.AE6B4QRANYC57GP5IPKPFRPMJRRQ/21ONWDG6MEE57 https://www.amazon.com/ideas/amzn1.account.AGQKXY47Z54HSUPCRCMQCTH6M75A/11CVW5HKLF5 https://www.amazon.com/ideas/amzn1.account.AGQKXY47Z54HSUPCRCMQCTH6M75A/M8MUOUBVFV0L -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug admin/22804] New: Contact Us @+1(8OO) 2O1-2898 Amazon Alexa Customer Service Number,Alexa Support 0
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22804 Bug ID: 22804 Summary: Contact Us @+1(8OO) 2O1-2898 Amazon Alexa Customer Service Number,Alexa Support 0 Product: binutils Version: unspecified Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: admin Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: buluryn at wmail dot club Target Milestone: --- https://www.amazon.com/ideas/amzn1.account.AGJ3IM7HK66BIHSOK5TT4BWSQKYQ/21EKIXYQJK7DZ https://www.amazon.com/ideas/amzn1.account.AEWPAD5V6T7GRH2MYJ3H7Q5ZHVHQ/3EAEWSPXPGBII https://www.amazon.com/ideas/amzn1.account.AGJ3IM7HK66BIHSOK5TT4BWSQKYQ/3UR48O4K4NFN2 https://www.amazon.com/ideas/amzn1.account.AEWPAD5V6T7GRH2MYJ3H7Q5ZHVHQ/38CWI9JL3IBXZ https://www.amazon.com/ideas/amzn1.account.AGQKXY47Z54HSUPCRCMQCTH6M75A/3BRLD4AJ29XBT https://www.amazon.com/ideas/amzn1.account.AE6B4QRANYC57GP5IPKPFRPMJRRQ/1VO7W881GD77H https://www.amazon.com/ideas/amzn1.account.AE6B4QRANYC57GP5IPKPFRPMJRRQ/2HR66E4CXE5KQ https://www.amazon.com/ideas/amzn1.account.AGQKXY47Z54HSUPCRCMQCTH6M75A/3JX54RWK1UA82 https://www.amazon.com/ideas/amzn1.account.AE6B4QRANYC57GP5IPKPFRPMJRRQ/21ONWDG6MEE57 https://www.amazon.com/ideas/amzn1.account.AGQKXY47Z54HSUPCRCMQCTH6M75A/11CVW5HKLF5 https://www.amazon.com/ideas/amzn1.account.AGQKXY47Z54HSUPCRCMQCTH6M75A/M8MUOUBVFV0L -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug admin/22806] New: Amazon Alexa Customer Service number 1-800-201-2898 usa ☊ ☋ ☌ ☍ ☎ ☏ ☐ ☑☒*Amazon Alexa customer service number############{{BhabhiJi}}
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22806
Bug ID: 22806
Summary: Amazon Alexa Customer Service number 1-800-201-2898
usa ☊ ☋ ☌ ☍ ☎ ☏ ☐ ☑☒*Amazon Alexa customer service
number{{BhabhiJi}}
Product: binutils
Version: unspecified
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: admin
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: buluryn at wmail dot club
Target Milestone: ---
https://www.amazon.com/ideas/amzn1.account.AGJ3IM7HK66BIHSOK5TT4BWSQKYQ/21EKIXYQJK7DZ
https://www.amazon.com/ideas/amzn1.account.AEWPAD5V6T7GRH2MYJ3H7Q5ZHVHQ/3EAEWSPXPGBII
https://www.amazon.com/ideas/amzn1.account.AGJ3IM7HK66BIHSOK5TT4BWSQKYQ/3UR48O4K4NFN2
https://www.amazon.com/ideas/amzn1.account.AEWPAD5V6T7GRH2MYJ3H7Q5ZHVHQ/38CWI9JL3IBXZ
https://www.amazon.com/ideas/amzn1.account.AGQKXY47Z54HSUPCRCMQCTH6M75A/3BRLD4AJ29XBT
https://www.amazon.com/ideas/amzn1.account.AE6B4QRANYC57GP5IPKPFRPMJRRQ/1VO7W881GD77H
https://www.amazon.com/ideas/amzn1.account.AE6B4QRANYC57GP5IPKPFRPMJRRQ/2HR66E4CXE5KQ
https://www.amazon.com/ideas/amzn1.account.AGQKXY47Z54HSUPCRCMQCTH6M75A/3JX54RWK1UA82
https://www.amazon.com/ideas/amzn1.account.AE6B4QRANYC57GP5IPKPFRPMJRRQ/21ONWDG6MEE57
https://www.amazon.com/ideas/amzn1.account.AGQKXY47Z54HSUPCRCMQCTH6M75A/11CVW5HKLF5
https://www.amazon.com/ideas/amzn1.account.AGQKXY47Z54HSUPCRCMQCTH6M75A/M8MUOUBVFV0L
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug admin/22805] New: Amazon Alexa Customer Service number 1-800-201-2898 usa ☊ ☋ ☌ ☍ ☎☏ ☐ ☑ ☒*Amazon Alexa customer service number############{{BhabhiJi}}
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22805
Bug ID: 22805
Summary: Amazon Alexa Customer Service number 1-800-201-2898
usa ☊ ☋ ☌ ☍ ☎☏ ☐ ☑ ☒*Amazon Alexa customer service
number{{BhabhiJi}}
Product: binutils
Version: unspecified
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: admin
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: buluryn at wmail dot club
Target Milestone: ---
https://www.amazon.com/ideas/amzn1.account.AGJ3IM7HK66BIHSOK5TT4BWSQKYQ/21EKIXYQJK7DZ
https://www.amazon.com/ideas/amzn1.account.AEWPAD5V6T7GRH2MYJ3H7Q5ZHVHQ/3EAEWSPXPGBII
https://www.amazon.com/ideas/amzn1.account.AGJ3IM7HK66BIHSOK5TT4BWSQKYQ/3UR48O4K4NFN2
https://www.amazon.com/ideas/amzn1.account.AEWPAD5V6T7GRH2MYJ3H7Q5ZHVHQ/38CWI9JL3IBXZ
https://www.amazon.com/ideas/amzn1.account.AGQKXY47Z54HSUPCRCMQCTH6M75A/3BRLD4AJ29XBT
https://www.amazon.com/ideas/amzn1.account.AE6B4QRANYC57GP5IPKPFRPMJRRQ/1VO7W881GD77H
https://www.amazon.com/ideas/amzn1.account.AE6B4QRANYC57GP5IPKPFRPMJRRQ/2HR66E4CXE5KQ
https://www.amazon.com/ideas/amzn1.account.AGQKXY47Z54HSUPCRCMQCTH6M75A/3JX54RWK1UA82
https://www.amazon.com/ideas/amzn1.account.AE6B4QRANYC57GP5IPKPFRPMJRRQ/21ONWDG6MEE57
https://www.amazon.com/ideas/amzn1.account.AGQKXY47Z54HSUPCRCMQCTH6M75A/11CVW5HKLF5
https://www.amazon.com/ideas/amzn1.account.AGQKXY47Z54HSUPCRCMQCTH6M75A/M8MUOUBVFV0L
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug admin/22803] setapai １~８００~２０１~２８９８ amazon Alexa customer support number @@@ amazon Alexa support phone number!
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22803 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #1 from Alan Modra --- spam -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug admin/22804] Contact Us @+1(8OO) 2O1-2898 Amazon Alexa Customer Service Number,Alexa Support 0
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22804 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #1 from Alan Modra --- spam -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug admin/22805] Amazon Alexa Customer Service number 1-800-201-2898 usa ☊ ☋ ☌ ☍ ☎☏ ☐ ☑ ☒*Amazon Alexa customer service number############{{BhabhiJi}}
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22805 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #1 from Alan Modra --- spam -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug admin/22806] Amazon Alexa Customer Service number 1-800-201-2898 usa ☊ ☋ ☌ ☍ ☎ ☏ ☐ ☑☒*Amazon Alexa customer service number############{{BhabhiJi}}
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22806 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #1 from Alan Modra --- spam -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22799 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #1 from Alan Modra --- spam -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
