[Bug binutils/23573] "Too many open files" and binutils 2.31.1-1
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23573 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |2.32 --- Comment #8 from Alan Modra --- Yes 2.32 should have this bug fixed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/23770] An Invalid memory address dereference was discovered in function read_reloc in raloc.c in program objdump.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23770 --- Comment #5 from wcventure --- (In reply to tanaya patil from comment #4) > What the version in which this fix is promoted? https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=0930cb3021b8078b34cf216e79eb8608d017864f -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/23770] An Invalid memory address dereference was discovered in function read_reloc in raloc.c in program objdump.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23770 tanaya patil changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tanaya_patil at persistent dot com --- Comment #4 from tanaya patil --- What the version in which this fix is promoted? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/23573] "Too many open files" and binutils 2.31.1-1
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23573 --- Comment #7 from mslomp at gmail dot com --- In that case, it should be landing on the upcoming 2.32 release, correct? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/23574] strip modifies vma of load segment containing headers
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23574 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED CC|amodra at gmail dot com| Resolution|--- |FIXED Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |amodra at gmail dot com --- Comment #3 from Alan Modra --- I believe this PR has been fixed with the six commits ending with 64029e93683. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/23573] "Too many open files" and binutils 2.31.1-1
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23573 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME --- Comment #6 from Alan Modra --- I suspect this bug has already been fixed on master. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/23653] ld SIGSEGVs when attempts to link sparc object with x86_64 library (--enable-targets=all): assertion fail ../../binutils-gdb/bfd/elfxx-sparc.c:1218
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23653 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #3 from Alan Modra --- The patch I've just committed is enough of an improvement that I'm going to declare this bug fixed. Going through the sparc backend, let alone all backends, to catch all segfaults when linking to foreign formats is too big a job for little benefit. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/23653] ld SIGSEGVs when attempts to link sparc object with x86_64 library (--enable-targets=all): assertion fail ../../binutils-gdb/bfd/elfxx-sparc.c:1218
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23653 --- Comment #2 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=4de5434b694fc260d02610e8e7fec21b2923600a commit 4de5434b694fc260d02610e8e7fec21b2923600a Author: Alan Modra Date: Wed Oct 17 09:17:30 2018 +1030 PR23653, ld SIGSEGVs when attempts to link sparc object with x86_64 library This patch improves dynobj selection. This allows the testcase in the PR to proceed further before segfaulting due to other bugs in the sparc backend. ../ld/ld-new --eh-frame-hdr -m elf_x86_64 -shared -o bug.so.5 bug.o ./libc.so.6 ./crtendS.o ../ld/ld-new: sparc architecture of input file `bug.o' is incompatible with i386:x86-64 output ../ld/ld-new: bug.o: in function `a': bug.c:(.text+0x4): undefined reference to `_GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_' ../ld/ld-new: bug.c:(.text+0x8): undefined reference to `_GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_' Segmentation fault PR 23653 * elflink.c (_bfd_elf_link_create_dynstrtab): Match elf_object_id too when choosing dynobj. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/23653] ld SIGSEGVs when attempts to link sparc object with x86_64 library (--enable-targets=all): assertion fail ../../binutils-gdb/bfd/elfxx-sparc.c:1218
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23653 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |amodra at gmail dot com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/22941] binutils build fails if intl/plural.y is newer than intl/plural.c
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22941 Egeyar Bagcioglu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egeyar.bagcioglu at oracle dot com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/23731] Building from git issues Ubuntu
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23731 --- Comment #7 from Jonny Grant --- It's a surprising that the patch clarifying bison, flex, texinfo packages are required in the README was not considered useful. At the moment, every new developer has 1 hour of time wasted before they can start doing anything. We'll re-assess if we devote time to contribute binutils -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
