[Bug ld/25205] relocation truncated to fit: R_RISCV_JAL against undefined symbol `pthread_once'
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25205 Jim Wilson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |wilson at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #11 from Jim Wilson --- Fixed on mainline. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/25205] relocation truncated to fit: R_RISCV_JAL against undefined symbol `pthread_once'
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25205 --- Comment #10 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Jim Wilson : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=85f783647061e58968ecdc516137d8df9f2d5e16 commit 85f783647061e58968ecdc516137d8df9f2d5e16 Author: Jim Wilson Date: Mon Jan 6 15:34:50 2020 -0800 RISC-V: Fix weak function call reloc overflow on llvm build. bfd/ PR 25205 * elfnn-riscv.c (riscv_elf_relocate_section) : Add check for !bfd_link_pic (info). : Move next to R_RISCV_CALL. : Add comment. (_bfd_riscv_relax_section): For plt.offset check, add check for bfd_link_pic (info). Add comment. Change-Id: Ie769bc3d5adf096a51df5cc12efe3d50e80acb8f -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/25235] Forward-referencing ADR instructions generate wrong offsets in Thumb code
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25235 Tamar Christina changed: What|Removed |Added Target||arm-* Target Milestone|--- |2.33 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/25327] FAIL: Run pr20276
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25327 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #7 from Nick Clifton --- Hi Dave, Right - I have gone ahead and built my own gcc-10 compiler, built a toolchain with it, and then run the linker testsuite. Sure enough I encountered the failures that you have mentioned. So I add some more "-fcommon" options to the linker tests, (possibly too many, but the extras should not hurt), and verified that the results should now be correct. At least for the x86_64-linux-gnu target Cheers Nick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/25327] FAIL: Run pr20276
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25327 --- Comment #6 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=0e1f1593bc441863d0e5dc586ca3dd8945d36782 commit 0e1f1593bc441863d0e5dc586ca3dd8945d36782 Author: Nick Clifton Date: Mon Jan 6 16:24:23 2020 + Add -fcommon compiler command line option to linker tests that need common symbols. PR 25327 * testsuite/ld-elf/shared.exp: Add -fcommon option to compiler command line when building libcomm1.o and pr13250 tests. * testsuite/ld-plugin/lto.exp: Likewise for pr20267 tests. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/25326] FAIL: Run pr19579
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25326 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #4 from Nick Clifton --- Patch applied. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/25326] FAIL: Run pr19579
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25326 --- Comment #3 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=d2dbcb18c6a44595a2034aa73a1ad7b60df114d3 commit d2dbcb18c6a44595a2034aa73a1ad7b60df114d3 Author: Nick Clifton Date: Mon Jan 6 14:00:34 2020 + Fix test of the fix for PR19579 when compiling with gcc-10. PR 25326 * testsuite/ld-elf/shared.exp: Add -fcommon option to compiler command line when building pr19579 binaries. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/25316] ia64 ld fails to convert binary into elf: "failed to merge target specific data"
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25316 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC||amodra at gmail dot com Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #5 from Alan Modra --- Fixed -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/25327] FAIL: Run pr20276
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25327 --- Comment #5 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 2020-01-06 5:14 a.m., nickc at redhat dot com wrote: > Is it possible that different versions of gcc are being used for the failing > and passing versions of the tests ? That's it. The fails are with gcc-10 experimental. The tests pass with Debian gcc-9. Dave -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/25344] z80 disassembler recursion
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25344 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|--- |2.34 --- Comment #5 from Alan Modra --- Fixed (without the change in comment #3). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/25344] z80 disassembler recursion
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25344 --- Comment #4 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=660e62b1d9ca02e4ec7b18e8f0a0ff0707e540ac commit 660e62b1d9ca02e4ec7b18e8f0a0ff0707e540ac Author: Alan Modra Date: Mon Jan 6 08:52:39 2020 +1030 PR25344, z80 disassembler recursion PR 25344 * z80-dis.c (suffix): Don't use a local struct buffer copy. Peek at next byte to prevent recursion on repeated prefix bytes. Ensure uninitialised "mybuf" is not accessed. (print_insn_z80): Don't zero n_fetch and n_used here,.. (print_insn_z80_buf): ..do it here instead. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/25327] FAIL: Run pr20276
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25327 --- Comment #4 from Nick Clifton --- (In reply to dave.anglin from comment #3) Hi Dave, > There's something wierd going on. I did a full build and check with patches > for ld/25326 and ld/25327 > and the following teats failed: > > FAIL: Run with libfunc1.so comm1.o > FAIL: Run pr20267a > FAIL: Run pr20267b > > I then reran the testsuite and these tests didn't fail. In my first check, > I just reran testsuite with patches. OK - that is strange. Do you still have the ld.log file for the failing tests ? If so, please can you inspect it and see if the "-fcommon" option added by the patch is present on the command lines used to build pr20267a and pr20267b ? Is it possible that different versions of gcc are being used for the failing and passing versions of the tests ? Uh - not sure how else this could happen... :-( Cheers Nick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/25235] Forward-referencing ADR instructions generate wrong offsets in Thumb code
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25235 Tamar Christina changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed||2020-01-06 CC||tnfchris at sourceware dot org Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |tnfchris at sourceware dot org Ever confirmed|0 |1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
