[Bug ld/30002] pr26391-5, pr26391-6 ld test failures on sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu since 496afd17055aeb7d8f45e01715c475664f2b73bd
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30002 --- Comment #15 from Sam James --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #13) > Created attachment 14602 [details] > Try this one This looks to have worked! The failures for binutils-try-debian-i386 / binutils-try-fedora-arm64 / binutils-try-fedora-s390x exist for the non-try variants, so they fail on master too. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/30002] pr26391-5, pr26391-6 ld test failures on sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu since 496afd17055aeb7d8f45e01715c475664f2b73bd
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30002 --- Comment #14 from Mark Wielaard --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #13) > Created attachment 14602 [details] > Try this one Note that since the gentoo-sparc builder also does binutils-try builds you can try by pushing to a branch starting with try- under your users name. e.g push origin :users/hjl/try-pr30002 More documentation here: https://sourceware.org/binutils/wiki/Buildbot -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/30002] pr26391-5, pr26391-6 ld test failures on sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu since 496afd17055aeb7d8f45e01715c475664f2b73bd
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30002 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #14601|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Comment #13 from H.J. Lu --- Created attachment 14602 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14602=edit Try this one -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/30002] pr26391-5, pr26391-6 ld test failures on sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu since 496afd17055aeb7d8f45e01715c475664f2b73bd
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30002
--- Comment #12 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #11)
> Thanks H.J., this works!
>
> === ld Summary ===
> # of expected passes 1598
> # of expected failures26
> # of untested testcases 1
> # of unsupported tests157
>
> What was the issue?
Interestingly, it causes failures on some buildbots (not sparc), like
https://builder.sourceware.org/buildbot/#/builders/113/builds/28.
```
FAIL: Build pr26391-5.o
FAIL: Build pr26391-6.o
PASS: Run pr26391-1
PASS: Run pr26391-2
PASS: Run pr26391-3
PASS: Run pr26391-4
FAIL: Run pr26391-5
FAIL: Run pr26391-6
```
```
gcc
-B/home/builder/shared/bb1-2/worker/binutils-try-opensuseleap-x86_64/binutils-build/ld/tmpdir/ld/
-I/home/builder/shared/bb1-2/worker/binutils-try-opensuseleap-x86_64/binutils-gdb/ld/testsuite/ld-elf
-g -O2 -c -g -O2 -fno-function-sections -c
/home/builder/shared/bb1-2/worker/binutils-try-opensuseleap-x86_64/binutils-gdb/ld/testsuite/ld-elf/pr26391a.c
-o tmpdir/pr26391a.o
Executing on host: sh -c {gcc
-B/home/builder/shared/bb1-2/worker/binutils-try-opensuseleap-x86_64/binutils-build/ld/tmpdir/ld/
-I/home/builder/shared/bb1-2/worker/binutils-try-opensuseleap-x86_64/binutils-gdb/ld/testsuite/ld-elf
-g -O2 -c -g -O2 -fno-function-sections -c
/home/builder/shared/bb1-2/worker/binutils-try-opensuseleap-x86_64/binutils-gdb/ld/testsuite/ld-elf/pr26391a.c
-o tmpdir/pr26391a.o 2>&1} /dev/null ld.tmp (timeout = 300)
spawn [open ...]
gcc
-B/home/builder/shared/bb1-2/worker/binutils-try-opensuseleap-x86_64/binutils-build/ld/tmpdir/ld/
-I/home/builder/shared/bb1-2/worker/binutils-try-opensuseleap-x86_64/binutils-gdb/ld/testsuite/ld-elf
-g -O2 -c -g -O2 -fno-function-sections -c
/home/builder/shared/bb1-2/worker/binutils-try-opensuseleap-x86_64/binutils-gdb/ld/testsuite/ld-elf/pr26391b.c
-o tmpdir/pr26391b.o
Executing on host: sh -c {gcc
-B/home/builder/shared/bb1-2/worker/binutils-try-opensuseleap-x86_64/binutils-build/ld/tmpdir/ld/
-I/home/builder/shared/bb1-2/worker/binutils-try-opensuseleap-x86_64/binutils-gdb/ld/testsuite/ld-elf
-g -O2 -c -g -O2 -fno-function-sections -c
/home/builder/shared/bb1-2/worker/binutils-try-opensuseleap-x86_64/binutils-gdb/ld/testsuite/ld-elf/pr26391b.c
-o tmpdir/pr26391b.o 2>&1} /dev/null ld.tmp (timeout = 300)
spawn [open ...]
gcc
-B/home/builder/shared/bb1-2/worker/binutils-try-opensuseleap-x86_64/binutils-build/ld/tmpdir/ld/
-I/home/builder/shared/bb1-2/worker/binutils-try-opensuseleap-x86_64/binutils-gdb/ld/testsuite/ld-elf
-g -O2 -c -g -O2 -fno-function-sections -c
/home/builder/shared/bb1-2/worker/binutils-try-opensuseleap-x86_64/binutils-gdb/ld/testsuite/ld-elf/pr26391c.c
-o tmpdir/pr26391c.o
Executing on host: sh -c {gcc
-B/home/builder/shared/bb1-2/worker/binutils-try-opensuseleap-x86_64/binutils-build/ld/tmpdir/ld/
-I/home/builder/shared/bb1-2/worker/binutils-try-opensuseleap-x86_64/binutils-gdb/ld/testsuite/ld-elf
-g -O2 -c -g -O2 -fno-function-sections -c
/home/builder/shared/bb1-2/worker/binutils-try-opensuseleap-x86_64/binutils-gdb/ld/testsuite/ld-elf/pr26391c.c
-o tmpdir/pr26391c.o 2>&1} /dev/null ld.tmp (timeout = 300)
spawn [open ...]
gcc
-B/home/builder/shared/bb1-2/worker/binutils-try-opensuseleap-x86_64/binutils-build/ld/tmpdir/ld/
-I/home/builder/shared/bb1-2/worker/binutils-try-opensuseleap-x86_64/binutils-gdb/ld/testsuite/ld-elf
-g -O2 -c -g -O2 -fno-function-sections -c
/home/builder/shared/bb1-2/worker/binutils-try-opensuseleap-x86_64/binutils-gdb/ld/testsuite/ld-elf/pr26391d.c
-o tmpdir/pr26391d.o
Executing on host: sh -c {gcc
-B/home/builder/shared/bb1-2/worker/binutils-try-opensuseleap-x86_64/binutils-build/ld/tmpdir/ld/
-I/home/builder/shared/bb1-2/worker/binutils-try-opensuseleap-x86_64/binutils-gdb/ld/testsuite/ld-elf
-g -O2 -c -g -O2 -fno-function-sections -c
/home/builder/shared/bb1-2/worker/binutils-try-opensuseleap-x86_64/binutils-gdb/ld/testsuite/ld-elf/pr26391d.c
-o tmpdir/pr26391d.o 2>&1} /dev/null ld.tmp (timeout = 300)
spawn [open ...]
gcc
-B/home/builder/shared/bb1-2/worker/binutils-try-opensuseleap-x86_64/binutils-build/ld/tmpdir/ld/
-L/usr/local/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/lib64 -L/usr/local/lib64 -L/lib64
-L/usr/lib64 -L/usr/local/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/lib -L/usr/local/lib -L/lib
-L/usr/lib -o tmpdir/pr26391-5.o
-L/home/builder/shared/bb1-2/worker/binutils-try-opensuseleap-x86_64/binutils-gdb/ld/testsuite/ld-elf
-Wl,-z,unique-symbol -r tmpdir/pr26391a.o tmpdir/pr26391b.o tmpdir/pr26391c.o
tmpdir/pr26391d.o
Executing on host: sh -c {gcc
-B/home/builder/shared/bb1-2/worker/binutils-try-opensuseleap-x86_64/binutils-build/ld/tmpdir/ld/
-L/usr/local/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/lib64 -L/usr/local/lib64 -L/lib64
-L/usr/lib64 -L/usr/local/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/lib -L/usr/local/lib -L/lib
-L/usr/lib -o tmpdir/pr26391-5.o
-L/home/builder/shared/bb1-2/worker/binutils-try-opensuseleap-x86_64/binutils-gdb/ld/testsuite/ld-elf
[Bug ld/30002] pr26391-5, pr26391-6 ld test failures on sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu since 496afd17055aeb7d8f45e01715c475664f2b73bd
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30002 --- Comment #11 from Sam James --- Thanks H.J., this works! === ld Summary === # of expected passes1598 # of expected failures 26 # of untested testcases 1 # of unsupported tests 157 What was the issue? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/30002] pr26391-5, pr26391-6 ld test failures on sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu since 496afd17055aeb7d8f45e01715c475664f2b73bd
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30002 --- Comment #10 from Mark Wielaard --- (In reply to cvs-com...@gcc.gnu.org from comment #9) > The try-PR26391 branch has been updated by Mark Wielaard > : > > https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git; > h=99175c84026b1bfa534f3946150535c39027911d > > commit 99175c84026b1bfa534f3946150535c39027911d > Author: Sam James > Date: Mon Jan 16 14:03:02 2023 -0800 Sorry, that was me, but a) I mistyped the correct branch name and b) changed the Author to Sam to show which emails the buildbot sents out. The actual try build with this patch is actually here: https://builder.sourceware.org/buildbot/#/changes/17250 try builders for binutils are described here: https://sourceware.org/binutils/wiki/Buildbot -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/26391] Question regarding duplicate symbols
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26391 --- Comment #14 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The try-PR26391 branch has been updated by Mark Wielaard : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=99175c84026b1bfa534f3946150535c39027911d commit 99175c84026b1bfa534f3946150535c39027911d Author: Sam James Date: Mon Jan 16 14:03:02 2023 -0800 ld: Use run_cc_link_tests for PR ld/26391 tests Use run_cc_link_tests for PR ld/26391 tests to compile PR ld/26391 tests in C. PR ld/30002 * testsuite/ld-elf/elf.exp: Use run_cc_link_tests for PR ld/26391 tests. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/30002] pr26391-5, pr26391-6 ld test failures on sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu since 496afd17055aeb7d8f45e01715c475664f2b73bd
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30002 --- Comment #9 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The try-PR26391 branch has been updated by Mark Wielaard : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=99175c84026b1bfa534f3946150535c39027911d commit 99175c84026b1bfa534f3946150535c39027911d Author: Sam James Date: Mon Jan 16 14:03:02 2023 -0800 ld: Use run_cc_link_tests for PR ld/26391 tests Use run_cc_link_tests for PR ld/26391 tests to compile PR ld/26391 tests in C. PR ld/30002 * testsuite/ld-elf/elf.exp: Use run_cc_link_tests for PR ld/26391 tests. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/30002] pr26391-5, pr26391-6 ld test failures on sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu since 496afd17055aeb7d8f45e01715c475664f2b73bd
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30002 --- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu --- Created attachment 14601 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14601=edit Try this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/30002] pr26391-5, pr26391-6 ld test failures on sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu since 496afd17055aeb7d8f45e01715c475664f2b73bd
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30002 --- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu --- The problem is unrelated to -z unique-symbol. I got $ cc -B/home/hjlu/build/build-sparc64-linux/ld/tmpdir/ld/ -L=/usr/local/sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib64 -L=/usr/local/lib64 -L=/lib64 -L=/usr/lib64 -L=/usr/local/sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib -L=/usr/local/lib -L=/lib -L=/usr/lib -o tmpdir/pr26391-5g -L/home/hjlu/git/binutils-gdb/ld/testsuite/ld-elf tmpdir/dummy.o tmpdir/pr26391a.o tmpdir/pr26391b.o tmpdir/pr26391c.o tmpdir/pr26391d.o $ tmpdir/pr26391-5g Illegal instruction (core dumped) $ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/30002] pr26391-5, pr26391-6 ld test failures on sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu since 496afd17055aeb7d8f45e01715c475664f2b73bd
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30002 --- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Sam James from comment #5) > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #4) > > I couldn't reproduce it on GCC compiler farm last time. The Linux/sparc64 > > machine on GCC compiler farm was down. > > I can give you access to this environment if you email me an SSH key. It's > purely for CI and clean otherwise. Done. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/30002] pr26391-5, pr26391-6 ld test failures on sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu since 496afd17055aeb7d8f45e01715c475664f2b73bd
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30002 --- Comment #5 from Sam James --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #4) > I couldn't reproduce it on GCC compiler farm last time. The Linux/sparc64 > machine on GCC compiler farm was down. I can give you access to this environment if you email me an SSH key. It's purely for CI and clean otherwise. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/13671] gld creates i386 relocations not supported by Solaris ld.so.1
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13671 --- Comment #31 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #29) > Created attachment 14590 [details] > Augmented^2 patch LGTM. Please send it to the binutils mailing list. Thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/30002] pr26391-5, pr26391-6 ld test failures on sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu since 496afd17055aeb7d8f45e01715c475664f2b73bd
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30002 --- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Mark Wielaard from comment #3) > See also https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26391#c10 I couldn't reproduce it on GCC compiler farm last time. The Linux/sparc64 machine on GCC compiler farm was down. Why does "ld -r -z unique-symbol" generate incorrect outputs on Linux/sparc64? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/29993] objcopy --merge-notes slow for large .so with many annobin notes
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29993 --- Comment #7 from William Cohen --- I rebuilt the binutils-2.39-8.fc38.src.rpm on the f36 machine that I originally discover merge_gnu_build_note taking a large fraction of the rpmbuild install and installed the resulting binutils rpms. The binutils change reduced samples in merge_gnu_build_note from 70% to 50%. Overall runtime was 2085 seconds wall clock time to 1049 seconds, so half of the original. compared the notes bewteen the system firefox libxul.so and the locally built one. There doesn't seem to be crazy differences between them. [wcohen@haro firefox-108.0.1-3.fc36.x86_64]$ pwd /home/wcohen/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/firefox-108.0.1-3.fc36.x86_64 [wcohen@haro firefox-108.0.1-3.fc36.x86_64]$ readelf --notes --wide /usr/lib64/firefox/libxul.so > /tmp/orig_xul readelf: /usr/lib64/firefox/libxul.so: Warning: Gap in build notes detected from 0xcb7d6f to 0x661aebf [wcohen@haro firefox-108.0.1-3.fc36.x86_64]$ readelf --notes --wide usr/lib64/firefox/libxul.so > /tmp/new_xul readelf: usr/lib64/firefox/libxul.so: Warning: Gap in build notes detected from 0xcb7d6f to 0x661aebf [wcohen@haro firefox-108.0.1-3.fc36.x86_64]$ diff -u /tmp/orig_xul /tmp/new_xul --- /tmp/orig_xul 2023-01-16 11:40:56.894249366 -0500 +++ /tmp/new_xul2023-01-16 11:41:07.068311517 -0500 @@ -1,15 +1,15 @@ Displaying notes found in: .note.gnu.build-id OwnerData size Description - GNU 0x0014 NT_GNU_BUILD_ID (unique build ID bitstring) Build ID: c71b2c4767cf93aa91b2d6ba97d520d954e46eaa + GNU 0x0014 NT_GNU_BUILD_ID (unique build ID bitstring) Build ID: 156d9c0ba3cc3b183e52e29aa814bda4bfec1f84 Displaying notes found in: .gnu.build.attributes OwnerData size Description GA$3a1 0x0010 OPENApplies to region from 0x9df000 to 0x661aeb2 - GA$3p1093 0x0010 OPENApplies to region from 0xcb7372 to 0xcb7d6e + GA$3p1092 0x0010 OPENApplies to region from 0xcb7372 to 0xcb7d6e GA*strong0x OPENApplies to region from 0xcb7372 to 0xcb7d6e - GA$annobin gcc 12.2.1 20220819 0x OPENApplies to region from 0xcb7372 to 0xcb7d6e - GA$plugin name: annobin 0x OPENApplies to region from 0xcb7372 to 0xcb7d6e + GA$annobin gcc 12.2.1 20221121 0x OPENApplies to region from 0xcb7372 to 0xcb7d6e + GA$plugin name: gcc-annobin 0x OPENApplies to region from 0xcb7372 to 0xcb7d6e GA$running gcc 12.2.1 20221121 0x OPENApplies to region from 0xcb7372 to 0xcb7d6e GA*0x12 0x OPENApplies to region from 0xcb7372 to 0xcb7d6e GA*PIC 0x OPENApplies to region from 0xcb7372 to 0xcb7d6e -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gprofng/30006] Failure to build binutils-2.40 on i686
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30006 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot c ||om Component|binutils|gprofng -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/30006] Failure to build binutils-2.40 on i686
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30006 --- Comment #3 from Satadru Pramanik --- Apologies. I have attached the entire build log from our build system. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/30006] Failure to build binutils-2.40 on i686
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30006 --- Comment #2 from Satadru Pramanik --- Created attachment 14599 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14599=edit Build log for binutils 2.40 on i686 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/29993] objcopy --merge-notes slow for large .so with many annobin notes
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29993 --- Comment #6 from Nick Clifton --- (In reply to Frank Ch. Eigler from comment #5) Hi Frank, Yes - I am afraid that the watermark protocol document is a bit out of date, and its rules for note merging do need to be updated. > So, as for a more efficient merging algorithm, I would explore something > like this: Your idea is excellent. However before I go down that route - and probably break building lots of packages by introducing new bugs - would you care to try out a scratch build of the binutils which has a tweaked merge algorithm ? https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=96203568 I just added a variable to keep track of the last non-deleted note, so that the backwards search could start from there, rather than the previous note. With this patch applied I found that merging libxul.so went down from 10.5 minutes to 5 minutes on my local machine. Not an order of magnitude improvement I know, but would it be enough for you ? I am hesitant to rewrite the algorithm entirely because if I get it wrong I am likely to break the building of other packages - either by corrupting the notes so that annocheck then complains, or breaking the merge process so that the rpms do not build or something else. Cheers Nick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/29991] gas: MicroMIPS flag mistakenly erased after align directives
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29991 --- Comment #7 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=5999477d92aecd9df5fb0b2f04c33b987a7db40c commit 5999477d92aecd9df5fb0b2f04c33b987a7db40c Author: Alan Modra Date: Fri Jan 13 09:39:19 2023 +1030 PR29991, MicroMIPS flag erased after align directives PR 29991 * config/tc-mips.c (s_align): Call file_mips_check_options and mips_mark_labels. * testsuite/gas/mips/align-after-label.s, * testsuite/gas/mips/mips-align-after-label.d, * testsuite/gas/mips/micromips-align-after-label.d: New test. * testsuite/gas/mips/mips.exp: Run it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/30006] Failure to build binutils-2.40 on i686
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30006 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab --- You have stripped the actual error from the build log. Please also state how you have configured the build. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
