[Bug gprofng/30006] Failure to build binutils-2.40 on i686
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30006 Vladimir Mezentsev changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed||2023-01-20 --- Comment #6 from Vladimir Mezentsev --- I cannot reproduce the problem on my Ubuntu VM: % uname -a Linux vmezents-20230117-1534 5.15.0-1021-oracle #27-Ubuntu SMP Fri Oct 14 20:04:26 UTC 2022 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux % /usr/bin/i686-linux-gnu-gcc-12 --version i686-linux-gnu-gcc-12 (Ubuntu 12.1.0-2ubuntu1~22.04) 12.1.0 Copyright (C) 2022 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. I don't know yet how to install Glibc 2.23 on my VM. Perhaps this is the reason for the build failure. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/13671] gld creates i386 relocations not supported by Solaris ld.so.1
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13671 --- Comment #33 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=1bb82b89ae9d884016e55f2ade99c74fcc92a581 commit 1bb82b89ae9d884016e55f2ade99c74fcc92a581 Author: Rainer Orth Date: Thu Jan 19 13:48:58 2023 -0800 i386: Don't emit unsupported TLS relocs on Solaris Emit R_386_TLS_LE and R_386_TLS_IE, instead of R_386_TLS_LE_32 and R_386_TLS_IE_32, on Solaris. PR ld/13671 * elf32-i386.c (elf_i386_tls_transition): Only emit R_386_TLS_LE, R_386_TLS_IE on Solaris. (elf_i386_relocate_section): Only use R_386_TLS_GD->R_386_TLS_LE transition on Solaris. Co-Authored-By: H.J. Lu -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug libctf/30013] [2.40 regression] Assertion failed: one_type != two_type, file libctf/ctf-dedup.c, line 2342, function sort_output_mapping
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30013 Nick Alcock changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |nick.alcock at oracle dot com --- Comment #1 from Nick Alcock --- Looks like it. This is strange because the no-qsort case is *meant* to get routinely tested... as is Solaris 11.3. But I don't often do full GCC bootstraps on it, so I guess we can see how this got past. I bet the underlying problem is that I missed the case where sort_output_mapping is called with the same arg twice (in which case it should obviously return 0). Some qsort implementations will do that, some won't, and I don't see anything preventing ctf-qsort.c from doing that :/ Taken, will fix and backport to 2.40. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/29998] ld terminated with signal 11 [Segmentation fault] under mingw with LTO
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29998
--- Comment #12 from Jan Janssen ---
Now it crashes here (sec->output_section is NULL):
#0 _bfd_coff_generic_relocate_section (output_bfd=0x5581c000,
info=0x557d8ec0 , input_bfd=0x55864020,
input_section=0x55878008, contents=0x55877f40 "U\270 \020",
relocs=0x55827f50, syms=0x55827aa0, sections=0x55827df0) at
/usr/src/debug/mingw-w64-binutils/binutils-2.40/bfd/cofflink.c:2985
sym = 0x55827d48
addend = 18446744073709551612
val = 0
sec = 0x558853c8
howto = 0x557c7580
symndx = 17
h = 0x5586b430
rstat = 0
rel = 0x55827f50
relend = 0x55827f70
__PRETTY_FUNCTION__ = "_bfd_coff_generic_relocate_section"
#1 0x5560c43e in coff_pe_amd64_relocate_section
(output_bfd=0x5581c000, info=0x557d8ec0 ,
input_bfd=0x55864020, input_section=0x55878008, contents=0x55877f40
"U\270 \020", relocs=0x55827f50, syms=0x55827aa0,
sections=0x55827df0) at
/usr/src/debug/mingw-w64-binutils/binutils-2.40/bfd/coff-x86_64.c:650
rel = 0x55827f70
relend = 0x55827f70
#2 0x55624296 in _bfd_coff_link_input_bfd (flaginfo=0x7fffdca0,
input_bfd=0x55864020) at
/usr/src/debug/mingw-w64-binutils/binutils-2.40/bfd/cofflink.c:2378
target_index = 1
internal_relocs = 0x55827f50
irel = 0x55827f70
contents = 0x55877f40 "U\270 \020"
secdata = 0x558766d0
n_tmask = 48
n_btshft = 4
adjust_symndx = 0x0
output_bfd = 0x5581c000
strings = 0x0
syment_base = 0
copy = false
hash = true
isymesz = 18
osymesz = 18
linesz = 6
esym = 0x55877134 ""
esym_end = 0x55877134 ""
isymp = 0x55827d70
secpp = 0x55827e80
indexp = 0x55827f30
output_index = 13
outsym = 0x558a503a ""
sym_hash = 0x558824e0
o = 0x55878008
__PRETTY_FUNCTION__ = "_bfd_coff_link_input_bfd"
#3 0x5562011f in _bfd_coff_final_link (abfd=0x5581c000,
info=0x557d8ec0 ) at
/usr/src/debug/mingw-w64-binutils/binutils-2.40/bfd/cofflink.c:866
symesz = 18
flaginfo = {info = 0x557d8ec0 , output_bfd =
0x5581c000, failed = 48, global_to_static = false, strtab = 0x55863d90,
section_info = 0x0, last_file_index = 0, last_file = {_n = {_n_name =
".file\000\000", _n_n = {_n_zeroes = 435610543662, _n_offset =
140737352970352}, _n_nptr = {0x656c69662e , 0x77ee3070 "`0\356\367\377\177"}},
n_value = 13, n_scnum = -2, n_flags = 21845, n_type = 0, n_sclass = 103 'g',
n_numaux = 1 '\001'}, last_bf_index = -1, last_bf = {x_sym = {x_tagndx = {l =
93824995155640, p = 0x5581deb8}, x_misc = {x_lnsz = {x_lnno = 6216, x_size
= 21897}, x_fsize = 93824995629128}, x_fcnary = {x_fcn = {x_lnnoptr =
93824995629080, x_endndx = {l = -251233387510272, p = 0x1b812b2e8600}},
x_ary = {x_dimen = {6168, 21897, 21845, 0}}}, x_tvndx = 0}, x_file = {x_n =
{x_fname = "\270ށUUU\000\000H\030\211UUU\000\000\030\030\211U", x_n = {x_zeroes
= 93824995155640, x_offset = 93824995629128}}, x_ftype = 0 '\000'}, x_scn =
{x_scnlen = 93824995155640, x_nreloc = 6216, x_nlinno = 21897, x_checksum =
93824995629080, x_associated = 34304, x_comdat = 46 '.'}, x_tv = {x_tvfill =
93824995155640, x_tvlen = 6216, x_tvran = {21897, 21845}}, x_csect = {x_scnlen
= {l = 93824995155640, p = 0x5581deb8}, x_parmhash = 93824995629128,
x_snhash = 6168, x_smtyp = 137 '\211', x_smclas = 85 'U', x_stab =
-251233387510272, x_snstab = 0}, x_sect = {x_scnlen = 93824995155640, x_nreloc
= 93824995629128}}, debug_merge = {root = {table = 0x5589c0a0, newfunc =
0x5561e4b4 <_bfd_coff_debug_merge_hash_newfunc>, memory = 0x55885370,
size = 4051, count = 0, entsize = 32, frozen = 0}}, internal_syms =
0x55827aa0, sec_ptrs = 0x55827df0, sym_indices = 0x55827ea0,
outsyms = 0x558a4f50 ".file", linenos = 0x55877f80
"P,\356\367\377\177", contents = 0x55877f40 "U\270 \020", external_relocs =
0x55837000 "\a", internal_relocs = 0x55827f50}
debug_merge_allocated = true
long_section_names = false
o = 0x5581d1e0
p = 0x558914e8
max_sym_count = 21
max_lineno_count = 0
max_reloc_count = 6
max_output_reloc_count = 0
max_contents_size = 48
rel_filepos = 3584
relsz = 10
line_filepos = 3584
linesz = 6
sub = 0x55864020
external_relocs = 0x0
strbuf = "\377\177\000"
amt = 192
#4 0x555aeddc in ldwrite () at
/usr/src/debug/mingw-w64-binutils/binutils-2.40/ld/ldwrite.c:545
No locals.
#5 0x555ab6ca in main (argc=17, argv=0x7fffdf68) at
/usr/src/debug/mingw-w64-binutils/binutils-2.40/ld/ldmain.c:524
emulation =
[Bug binutils/30022] concurrent builds can fail
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30022 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Target Milestone|--- |2.41 Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #3 from Alan Modra --- Fixed -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/11622] libiberty .o vs. obj => @OBJEXT@
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11622 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW |RESOLVED --- Comment #2 from Alan Modra --- Fixed a long time ago -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/11633] bintuils testsuit fails if built with CFLAGS="-fstack-protector-all"
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11633 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Status|NEW |RESOLVED --- Comment #3 from Alan Modra --- Yes, there are many CFLAGS that perturb the testsuite -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/29998] ld terminated with signal 11 [Segmentation fault] under mingw with LTO
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29998 --- Comment #11 from Nick Clifton --- Created attachment 14608 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14608=edit Proposed patch Hi Jan, OK, well in that case, please could you try out this small patch ? I have a feeling however that whilst it might fix the seg-fault that you have encountered, there will be another one later on in the link. Or not - I could be wrong. Cheers Nick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/11597] bra.s to next instruction does not produce an error
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11597 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |OBSOLETE --- Comment #2 from Alan Modra --- m68k-aout targets have be obsolete for a while -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/29991] gas: MicroMIPS flag mistakenly erased after align directives
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29991 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Target Milestone|--- |2.41 Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #8 from Alan Modra --- Fixed for 2.41 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/30022] concurrent builds can fail
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30022 --- Comment #2 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=8344ebca2505103c18aa2a1bfb8d200624caf4e6 commit 8344ebca2505103c18aa2a1bfb8d200624caf4e6 Author: Alan Modra Date: Thu Jan 19 09:34:56 2023 +1030 PR 30022, concurrent builds can fail So let's not copy .libs/libbfd.a to libbfd.a now that nothing in the binutils-gdb source tries to link against it. PR 30022 * Makefile.am (noinst_LIBRARIES, libbfd_a_SOURCES, stamp-lib), (libbfd.a): Delete rules. (CLEANFILES): Adjust to suit. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
