[Bug ld/31133] [riscv64] -z now breaks glibc testsuite
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31133 Aurelien Jarno changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aurelien at aurel32 dot net, ||sch...@linux-m68k.org --- Comment #2 from Aurelien Jarno --- A bisect pointed me to the following commit: 7345d05aafde53a48d5a587a6d9c1778db78e0f3 is the first bad commit commit 7345d05aafde53a48d5a587a6d9c1778db78e0f3 Author: Andreas Schwab Date: Thu Sep 21 16:49:41 2023 +0200 RISC-V: Protect .got with relro Move .got before .data so that it can be protected with -zrelro. Also separate .got.plt from .got if -znow is not in effect; the first two words of .got.plt are placed within the relro region. ld: PR ld/30877 * emulparams/elf32lriscv-defs.sh (DATA_GOT, SEPARATE_GOTPLT): Define. * emulparams/elf64lriscv-defs.sh (SEPARATE_GOTPLT): Define. * testsuite/ld-elf/binutils.exp (binutils_test): Remove riscv*-*-* from relro_got expression. ld/emulparams/elf32lriscv-defs.sh | 4 ld/emulparams/elf64lriscv-defs.sh | 1 + ld/testsuite/ld-elf/binutils.exp | 1 - 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/31120] ld-scripts/fill2 fails when bfd_vma is 32 bits
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31120 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||danglin at gcc dot gnu.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
Issue 62986 in oss-fuzz: binutils:fuzz_nm: Heap-buffer-overflow in bfd_getl16
Updates: Labels: -restrict-view-commit Comment #3 on issue 62986 by sheriffbot: binutils:fuzz_nm: Heap-buffer-overflow in bfd_getl16 https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=62986#c3 This bug has been fixed. It has been opened to the public. - Your friendly Sheriffbot -- You received this message because: 1. You were specifically CC'd on the issue You may adjust your notification preferences at: https://bugs.chromium.org/hosting/settings Reply to this email to add a comment.
[Bug gas/31115] [ARM] The minimalistic DWARF DIE for function has wrong address in Thumb mode
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31115 --- Comment #5 from Nick Clifton --- (In reply to Thiago Jung Bauermann from comment #4) Hi Thiago, > $ gcc -g -o pr25124 ~/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/pr25124.S > $ gdb pr25124 > Reading symbols from pr25124... > (gdb) x/i main >0x103e5 : bx pc > (gdb) x/i main+8 >0x103ed :vrhadd.u16 d14, d14, d31 > (gdb) quit > > Interestingly, as can be seen above "x/i main" actually works fine. Except that the address is displayed with the bottom bit set, which might be confusing the readers. Maybe. > it's "x/i main+8" that breaks. This is a detail that I just noticed. > > There's another thing I just discovered : I can reproduce GDB's bad > behavior on an ELF executable (produced by GCC from the .S file), but > not on a .o file produced directly by gas: Or one that is produced by using gcc to invoke just gas. ie compiling with "-c". > $ as -g -o pr25124.o ~/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/pr25124.S > $ gdb pr25124.o > Reading symbols from pr25124.o... > (gdb) x/i main >0x0 : bx pc > (gdb) x/i main+8 >0x8 :bx lr > (gdb) quit Interestingly my patch makes things even worse for the fully linked executable: $ gdb pr25124.with-nicks-patch GNU gdb (GDB) Fedora Linux 13.2-6.fc38 [...] (gdb) x/i main 0x8243 <_start+158>: movsr0, r0 (gdb) x/i main+8 0x824b : b.n 0x898e So please consider it withdrawn. > Both the executable and the .o file have the LSB bit set in main's > DW_AT_low_pc: > So for some reason GDB is fine with an object file containing the wrong > DW_AT_low_pc in main's DIE, but not when it's with a "full blown" > executable. My guess - totally unproven - is that GDB has special code to mask thumb addresses for object files, but for some reason this code is not applied to linked executables. I do wonder if this is something that GDB has already partially fixed, and maybe this fix needs to be extended... Anyway I am investigating gas some more... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/31134] 2.41: build fails with --disable-warn-execstack
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31134 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment #3 from Nick Clifton --- Hi Kloczek, Sorry - I am unable to reproduce this problem. Can you show the entire configure command line that you used ? Cheers Nick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
