[Bug binutils/23881] pdp11 binutils fails if too much debug data
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23881 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-02-28 Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW --- Comment #2 from Alan Modra --- This is because the length of the symbol table exceeds 64k and struct pdp11_external_exec e_syms is only 2 bytes. Apparently the pdp11 backend linker doesn't notice the overflow. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/23928] ar crash within LLVMgold.so module
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23928 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #7 from Alan Modra --- As per comment #6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gold/23969] PowerPC64 ELFv1 --defsym func1=func2 call to func1 errors
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23969 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Status|NEW |RESOLVED --- Comment #1 from Alan Modra --- I doubt this will ever be fixed, so closing -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/24002] A memory leak issue was discovered in cplus-dem.c
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24002 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |MOVED Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED --- Comment #3 from Alan Modra --- . -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/24055] _bfd_xcoff_swap_aux_in smashes the stack
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24055 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED --- Comment #9 from Alan Modra --- I believe this one has been fixed, by e86fc4a5bc37 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/24156] gcc -N -nostdlib test.c creates PT_PHDR out of range for auxiliary vector fetching of AT_PHDR
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24156 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #1 from Alan Modra --- Current ld will give "t: error: PHDR segment not covered by LOAD segment", so fixed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/24192] ld doesn't properly process relocations to deduplicated code in PE files
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24192 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED --- Comment #1 from Alan Modra --- Same answer as https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24191#c1 Both x86_64 and i386 ld.bfd now give similar pe output -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/24241] bug-report:inline-asm generates object file error
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24241 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #1 from Alan Modra --- After fixing the testcase so that it assembles, there doesn't seem to be a problem here, if I set image-base to be something reasonable. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/24319] Compressed / uncompressed debug info confusion in BFD
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24319 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #5 from Alan Modra --- fixed -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/24326] `nm` outputs symbol values of 0 for ft LTO object files
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24326 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |NOTABUG --- Comment #7 from Alan Modra --- Expected behaviour -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/24338] Heap-buffer-overflow in elf_x86_64_relocate_section in elf64-x86-64.c in bfd
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24338 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED --- Comment #4 from Alan Modra --- Fixed -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/24447] Provides patches for all CVEs in version 2.31.1
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24447 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |OBSOLETE --- Comment #1 from Alan Modra --- Thanks, closing now since 2.31 is very old -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/24455] strip -S after patchelf damages the file
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24455 --- Comment #3 from Alan Modra --- This may have been fixed by the patch for pr31208, which was also objcopy/strip not properly handling the output of patchelf. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/24491] -z separate-code generates segment with both rodata and text
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24491 --- Comment #2 from Alan Modra --- What do you expect ld to do here? Warn perhaps? Your script puts the start of .text at the end of .rodata and not on a page boundary. You're making a demand paged binary. There isn't any point in trying to make them go into two pt_load headers. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/24701] Irix 6.5.30, gcc8.2.0, LD does not output well formed executables
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24701 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Target||mips-sgi-irix6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/24717] .note.gnu.property sections are not stored at an offset equal to their VMA in debuginfo files
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24717 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED --- Comment #11 from Alan Modra --- Fixed as per comment #7 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/24730] INCLUDE and --default-script / --script have different whitespace behavior when using REGION_ALIAS
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24730 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW |RESOLVED --- Comment #3 from Alan Modra --- This was fixed with 41ee6d14fd3f -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/24768] Stop using __gnu_lto_slim symbol as a detection of a slim LTO object
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24768 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED --- Comment #9 from Alan Modra --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #5) > Should be implemented now. Let's keep this issue to remove later the usage > of __gnu_lto_slim. I don't think we should remove the __gnu_lto_slim tests in the linker or binutils, unless we get to a point where we need to kill support for older gcc versions in binutils for other reasons. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/24836] --as-needed can leave unused direct dependencies if combined with --gc-sections
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24836 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |NOTABUG --- Comment #12 from Alan Modra --- As per comment #7 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/24881] x86_64-linux-gnu-ld.bfd does not convert instructions for GOTPCRELX if output format is binary
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24881 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX --- Comment #2 from Alan Modra --- As per comment #1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/24893] ld 57 unexpected failures on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.4
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24893 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |OBSOLETE --- Comment #5 from Alan Modra --- 2.32 is obsolete -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/24945] as/objdump accepting invalid default destination mask.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24945 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #1 from Alan Modra --- Fixed with 596a02ff558a -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/25061] git libxml++ test unit linking causes cre dump of the /usr/bin/ld.bfd
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25061 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #9 from Alan Modra --- Fixed, presumably. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/25063] 2.33: Missing dist tar ball
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25063 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED --- Comment #5 from Alan Modra --- . -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/25202] objcopy --verilog-data-width doesn't respect target's endianness
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25202 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|WAITING |RESOLVED --- Comment #25 from Alan Modra --- Fixed, presumably. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/25247] addr2line is super slow on dwz output
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25247 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |OBSOLETE --- Comment #1 from Alan Modra --- testcase has disappeared -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/25315] `__tcf_0' referenced in section `.rodata._ZNK6common26ChainResidueAtomDescriptor3strB5cxx11Ev.cst4' of mode_query_balls_distances.o: defined in discarded section `.text.__tcf_0[_ZNK6com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25315 --- Comment #18 from Alan Modra --- (In reply to John David Anglin from comment #16) > I committed a gcc change to trunk and gcc-9 to put references to function > labels in COMDAT groups in .data.rel.ro.local. Can this bug be closed then? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/30277] GNU as produce '.symtab' entries with incorrect order for 32-bit MIPS target
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30277 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |NOTABUG --- Comment #1 from Alan Modra --- (In reply to WHR from comment #0) > As shown by readelf(1), there are some LOCAL symbols follow the last GLOBAL > symbol, this is not allowed by ELF specification. That is true, but mips targets that follow the way mips-sgi-irix* broke the ELF standard sort symbols like this, sections symbols first, including any global section symbols, then all other symbols. If you'd like the usual order, choose a mips target that has "trad" in the target_defvec specified in bfd/config.bfd. > $ mips64-none-elfabi64-ld -m elf32btsmip sym-order-test.o > mips64-none-elfabi64-ld: sym-order-test.o: .symtab local symbol at index 11 > (>= sh_info of 8) > mips64-none-elfabi64-ld: sym-order-test.o: error adding symbols: bad value OK, so now you're trying to link using a traditional order target. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gprofng/31116] gprofng test fails with "comparison of results in synprog failed" on x86_64-linux-gnu
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31116 Kurt Goebel changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kurt.goebel at oracle dot com Priority|P2 |P3 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
