[Bug gas/16109] Incorrect listing (single line comment after multiline one causes line mis-alignment)
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16109 Alexey Makhalov makhaloff at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |UNCONFIRMED CC||makhaloff at gmail dot com Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |makhaloff at gmail dot com Ever confirmed|1 |0 --- Comment #1 from Alexey Makhalov makhaloff at gmail dot com --- Created attachment 7272 -- https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7272action=edit patch to fix that problem Multiline comment increases add_newlines counter by each newline. And after */\n app inserts necessary amount of \n. But it didn't happen after */#some comment\n sequence. This patch fixes that. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/16109] Incorrect listing (single line comment after multiline one causes line mis-alignment)
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16109 Alexey Makhalov makhaloff at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME --- Comment #2 from Alexey Makhalov makhaloff at gmail dot com --- I've checked on some tests. It works for me. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/16109] New: Incorrect listing (single line comment after multiline one causes line mis-alignment)
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16109 Bug ID: 16109 Summary: Incorrect listing (single line comment after multiline one causes line mis-alignment) Product: binutils Version: 2.23 Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gas Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: makhaloff at gmail dot com I have a simple example: /* */# nop nop There are some assembler outputs: $ arm-linux-gnueabi-as -ahl 1.s ARM GAS 1.spage 1 1/* 2 A0E1 */# 3nop 4 0004 A0E1 nop 5 $ mips-linux-as -ahl 1.s GAS LISTING 1.s page 1 1/* 2 */# 3nop 4 0004 nop 5 0008 5 After some modification: /* */ nop nop listing is corect. $ arm-linux-gnueabi-as -ahl 1.s ARM GAS 1.spage 1 1/* 2*/ 3 A0E1 nop 4 0004 A0E1 nop 5 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/14017] New: Bug in symbol arithmetic
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14017 Bug #: 14017 Summary: Bug in symbol arithmetic Product: binutils Version: 2.23 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gas AssignedTo: unassig...@sourceware.org ReportedBy: makhal...@gmail.com Classification: Unclassified Created attachment 6364 -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=6364 Patch to fix this bug I got error on this code: .text NULL: PS_8K = 0x40 OFFSET = (System1 - NULL) S = (OFFSET + PS_8K) movl $2,S .org 0x2000 System1: S will be equal 0x40. But actual value should be 0x2040. The reason is as follows: * gas/read.c (pseudo_set): Fixed x=undef+const case (expr_sections is undefined at this time also) Example and patch are attached. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/14017] Bug in symbol arithmetic
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14017 --- Comment #1 from Alexey Makhalov makhaloff at gmail dot com 2012-04-24 22:26:50 UTC --- Created attachment 6365 -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=6365 Example to test this bug -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/14019] New: Potential bug with on stack allocated variable
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14019
Bug #: 14019
Summary: Potential bug with on stack allocated variable
Product: binutils
Version: 2.23 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: gas
AssignedTo: unassig...@sourceware.org
ReportedBy: makhal...@gmail.com
Classification: Unclassified
gas/read.c:1771
if (line_label != NULL)
{
expressionS exp;
exp.X_op = O_symbol;
exp.X_add_symbol = sym;
exp.X_add_number = 0;
symbol_set_value_expression (line_label, exp);
symbol_set_frag (line_label, zero_address_frag);
S_SET_SEGMENT (line_label, expr_section);
}
line_label is global, exp is local on stack allocated.
I might be reason of bug later.
Perhaps I wrong?
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/845] GAS .rept pseudo op-code
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=845 Alexey Makhalov makhaloff at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||makhaloff at gmail dot com -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/13624] New: Unpredictable behavior in the directives .rept, .macro and perhaps in some other
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13624 Bug #: 13624 Summary: Unpredictable behavior in the directives .rept, .macro and perhaps in some other Product: binutils Version: 2.23 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gas AssignedTo: unassig...@sourceware.org ReportedBy: makhal...@gmail.com Classification: Unclassified Created attachment 6176 -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=6176 Patch to fix this bug Hello. I got the same error as described in the bug #845. I got it on my target KVARC (http://km211.biz/en/kvarc-32bit), which is not present in official sources of binutils. My case. I have a big .s file, size 65K bytes. There is a code fragment in the middle of file .rept (0x100 - 0x20) .long TrapAll .long 0x0 .endr It generates error interrupt.s: Assembler messages: interrupt.s:3120: Error: unknown pseudo-op: `.lon' If I add new line before this code fragment then get another error interrupt.s: Assembler messages: interrupt.s:3121: Error: unknown pseudo-op: `.l' The reason is as follows: * gas/app.c (app_push): Variable add_newlines should be set to zero after saving. Patch is attached. Sorry, It's hard to reproduce for you. But I can tell you how it leads to the error, if necessary Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/13624] Unpredictable behavior in the directives .rept, .macro and perhaps in some others
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13624 Alexey Makhalov makhaloff at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Unpredictable behavior in |Unpredictable behavior in |the directives .rept, |the directives .rept, |.macro and perhaps in some |.macro and perhaps in some |other |others -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
