[Bug binutils/28791] [z80-unknown-elf-as]: new unexpected overflow warning in v2.37
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28791 --- Comment #3 from Sergey Belyashov --- I have no an idea how to fix it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/28762] [z80-unknown-elf-as]: assembly fails, but fixed with a blank line
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28762 --- Comment #11 from Sergey Belyashov --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #6) > (In reply to Sergey Belyashov from comment #5) > > Attached patch which fixes the bug. > > Patch approved - please apply. > > (Thanks for the quick fix! :-) As I know, I have no rights to apply fixes. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/28762] [z80-unknown-elf-as]: assembly fails, but fixed with a blank line
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28762 --- Comment #9 from Sergey Belyashov --- It is intermediate buffer. There is already preparsed test (no comments, white spaces reduced to one space, etc). The buffer is 32*1024 size (32768 bytes). So if "LD A" is in buffer1 and ",B\n" in the buffer2, then comma is lost. If you add any non-whitespace symbol before this line then A is moved to buffer2 and no issues appear. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/28762] [z80-unknown-elf-as]: assembly fails, but fixed with a blank line
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28762 --- Comment #5 from Sergey Belyashov --- Created attachment 13903 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13903=edit Fix symbol lost on buffer load do_scub_chars() has special behaviour to parse Z80 alternate register pair AF'. There was a bug when symbol 'a' is present but next symbol is not 'f'. If 'a' was last symbol of previous buffer and 'f' is not first symbol of the next buffer then it losts. Attached patch which fixes the bug. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/28762] [z80-unknown-elf-as]: assembly fails, but fixed with a blank line
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28762 --- Comment #4 from Sergey Belyashov --- Bug is present in current development branch. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/27878] [z80-unknown-elf]: ld (hl), <16 bit immediate> should fail assembly
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27878 --- Comment #2 from Sergey Belyashov --- Created attachment 13463 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13463=edit Fix silent compilation of overflow constants -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/27415] eZ80 relocation computation fails unexpectedly
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27415 Sergey Belyashov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/27415] eZ80 relocation computation fails unexpectedly
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27415 --- Comment #2 from Sergey Belyashov --- Created attachment 13421 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13421=edit Workaround patch -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/27415] eZ80 relocation computation fails unexpectedly
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27415 --- Comment #1 from Sergey Belyashov --- Term "high word" means word which is higher than low word: x >> 16. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/27415] eZ80 relocation computation fails unexpectedly
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27415 Sergey Belyashov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sergey.belyashov at gmail dot com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/27823] [z80-unknown-elf] invalid instruction `ld h, ()` should not assemble
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27823 Sergey Belyashov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/27823] [z80-unknown-elf] invalid instruction `ld h, ()` should not assemble
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27823 --- Comment #1 from Sergey Belyashov --- Created attachment 13420 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13420=edit Patch which fixes this bug and adds tests -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/27047] .bss pseudo operation not supported for target z80-unknown-elf
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27047 --- Comment #5 from Sergey Belyashov --- I think, it is OK. I just took code from blackfin source. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/27047] .bss pseudo operation not supported for target z80-unknown-elf
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27047 --- Comment #3 from Sergey Belyashov --- Created attachment 13038 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13038=edit Add .bss instruction support This patch adds support for .bss directive. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/27047] bss section not supported for target z80-unknown-elf
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27047 --- Comment #1 from Sergey Belyashov --- .bss section is supported. But .bss pseudo operation is not supported. You can create .bss section using .section pseudo operation. Just try: $ cat a.s .section .bss myvar: .ds 2 $ z80-unknown-elf-as a.s $ z80-unknown-elf-readelf -t a.out ... [ 3] .bss NOBITS 34 02 00 0 0 1 [0003]: WRITE, ALLOC ... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/26692] New: [Z80][PATCH] Small GAS code improvements
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26692 Bug ID: 26692 Summary: [Z80][PATCH] Small GAS code improvements Product: binutils Version: unspecified Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gas Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: sergey.belyashov at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 12880 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12880=edit Small code improvements Add explicit initialization of expression structures. Improve hash sign handling when SDCC compatibility mode enabled. Improve indirect addressing detection -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/25690] New: [Z80] Add support for XREF and XDEF directives
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25690 Bug ID: 25690 Summary: [Z80] Add support for XREF and XDEF directives Product: binutils Version: unspecified Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gas Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: sergey.belyashov at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 12385 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12385=edit Add support for XREF and XDEF directives Also updated GAS documentation. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/25633] z80: [PATCH] Fix unsupported register registration
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25633 Sergey Belyashov changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #12349|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Comment #1 from Sergey Belyashov --- Created attachment 12380 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12380=edit Fix unsupported register registration Fix test failures for z80-coff target. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/25668] z80: [patch] Fix colonless labels support
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25668 Sergey Belyashov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/25668] New: z80: [patch] Fix colonless labels support
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25668 Bug ID: 25668 Summary: z80: [patch] Fix colonless labels support Product: binutils Version: unspecified Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gas Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: sergey.belyashov at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 12371 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12371=edit Fix colonless labels support GAS in colonless mode fails to compile lines containing colonless label and instruction with first operand inside parentheses, like: lab1 jp (hl) lab2 ld (address),a This patch fixes it. Moreover, it replaces earlier colonless simulation by standard LABELS_WITHOUT_COLONS macro definition. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/25633] z80: [PATCH] Fix unsupported register registration
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25633 Sergey Belyashov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at sourceware dot org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/25641] New: z80: [patch] Fix eZ80 disassembler
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25641 Bug ID: 25641 Summary: z80: [patch] Fix eZ80 disassembler Product: binutils Version: unspecified Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: sergey.belyashov at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 12353 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12353=edit Fix disassembling ED+A4/AC/B4/BC opcodes Fix invalid disassemble for opcodes: ED A4 - outi2 ED AC - outd2 ED B4 - oti2r ED BC - otd2r -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/25641] z80: [patch] Fix eZ80 disassembler
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25641 Sergey Belyashov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at sourceware dot org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/25633] New: z80: [PATCH] Fix unsupported register registration
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25633 Bug ID: 25633 Summary: z80: [PATCH] Fix unsupported register registration Product: binutils Version: unspecified Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gas Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: sergey.belyashov at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 12349 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12349=edit Fix unsupported register registration Fix registration of unsupported by target CPU registers. Simplify z80.exp testsuit file. Now test are globbered by mask *.d. Remove invalid information about Z80 CPU features in built-in help. GBZ80 have no support for registers I, IX*, IY*, R, and MB; Z180 have no support for IXL, IXH, IYL, IYH, and MB... Now all these names can be used for generic symbols. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/25627] z80: [patch] Fix instruction assemble and disassemble bug
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25627 Sergey Belyashov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at sourceware dot org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/25627] New: z80: [patch] Fix instruction assemble and disassemble bug
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25627 Bug ID: 25627 Summary: z80: [patch] Fix instruction assemble and disassemble bug Product: binutils Version: unspecified Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gas Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: sergey.belyashov at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 12339 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12339=edit fix LD IY,(HL) and LD (HL),IX The patch fixed invalid compilation of instruction LD IY,(HL) and disassemble of this and LD (HL),IX instruction. Also it update testsuit. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/25604] z80: [patch] Fix segfault caused by infinite recursion
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25604 Sergey Belyashov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at sourceware dot org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/25604] New: z80: [patch] Fix segfault caused by infinite recursion
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25604 Bug ID: 25604 Summary: z80: [patch] Fix segfault caused by infinite recursion Product: binutils Version: unspecified Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gas Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: sergey.belyashov at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 12324 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12324=edit fix recursion patch Fix GAS segfault on some rare circumstances. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/25602] New: Unclear documentation about .altmacro
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25602 Bug ID: 25602 Summary: Unclear documentation about .altmacro Product: binutils Version: unspecified Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gas Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: sergey.belyashov at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- 1. .altmacro documentation has no any examples. But usage of %expr is unclear (it is hard to understand, that it works for macro arguments). 2. There is no information about ampersand symbol, which can be used as delimiter in the macro (present in the .macro documentation). But how to do bitwise AND inside macro (backslash and exclamation does not work as escapes)?!? Go..le does not know it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/25537] z80: [patch] Move machine type compatibility check from emulation to the BFD (remove code duplication)
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25537 Sergey Belyashov changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[Z80][PATCH] Move machine |z80: [patch] Move machine |type compatibility check|type compatibility check |from emulation to the BFD |from emulation to the BFD ||(remove code duplication) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/25517] Z80: [patch] Use -march=CPU[-EXT][+EXT] instead of -gbz80/-z80n/etc
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25517 Sergey Belyashov changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[Z80][PATCH] Use|Z80: [patch] Use |-march=CPU[-EXT][+EXT] |-march=CPU[-EXT][+EXT] |instead of lot of options |instead of -gbz80/-z80n/etc |of GAS | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/25576] z80: [patch] Remove unnecessary local label definition
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25576 Sergey Belyashov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/25576] New: z80: [patch] Remove unnecessary local label definition
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25576 Bug ID: 25576 Summary: z80: [patch] Remove unnecessary local label definition Product: binutils Version: unspecified Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gas Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: sergey.belyashov at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 12301 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12301=edit Remove unnecessary local label definition I have missunderstood about local/global names. I think, that all non-local (which are identified by assembler or BFD) symbols are global. This patch removes SDCC compatibility for: - mark all non-global symbols prefixed by underscore as local. - clear dollar-label cache after any non-dollar-label definition (cause test fail, because really local label is used in it - fixed). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/12269] unknown-z80-coff: Incorrect assembly of indexed register offsets from equ declarations
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12269 Sergey Belyashov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com, ||sergey.belyashov at gmail dot com --- Comment #4 from Sergey Belyashov --- Please close the bug as fixed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/25537] [Z80][PATCH] Move machine type compatibility check from emulation to the BFD
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25537 Sergey Belyashov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/21565] Z80: Incorrect linkage of call instructions
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21565 --- Comment #2 from Sergey Belyashov --- Please close the bug as invalid. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/25517] [Z80][PATCH] Use -march=CPU[-EXT][+EXT] instead of lot of options of GAS
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25517 --- Comment #4 from Sergey Belyashov --- Sorry. My previous message is invalid. Do not close! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/25517] [Z80][PATCH] Use -march=CPU[-EXT][+EXT] instead of lot of options of GAS
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25517 --- Comment #3 from Sergey Belyashov --- Please close this bug as invalid. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/21565] Z80: Incorrect linkage of call instructions
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21565 Sergey Belyashov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/25531] [Z80][PATCH] Fix SDCC support
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25531 Sergey Belyashov changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #12282|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Comment #1 from Sergey Belyashov --- Created attachment 12291 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12291=edit Fix SDCC support Add related change from another patch. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/25517] [Z80][PATCH] Use -march=CPU[-EXT][+EXT] instead of lot of options of GAS
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25517 Sergey Belyashov changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #12273|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Comment #2 from Sergey Belyashov --- Created attachment 12290 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12290=edit Add -march option to GAS Removed unnecessary changes. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/25537] New: [Z80][PATCH] Move machine type compatibility check from emulation to the BFD
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25537 Bug ID: 25537 Summary: [Z80][PATCH] Move machine type compatibility check from emulation to the BFD Product: binutils Version: unspecified Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: ld Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: sergey.belyashov at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 12289 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12289=edit Move compatibility check from emulation template to BFD This patch moves machine type compatibility checking from emulation template to BFD (bfd/cpu-z80.c). Now emulation template contains small code which calls standard bfd_arch_get_compatible () to determine machine of result file. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/25531] [Z80][PATCH] Fix SDCC support
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25531 Sergey Belyashov changed: What|Removed |Added Target||z80-unknown-* CC||nickc at redhat dot com Version|unspecified |2.34 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/25531] New: [Z80][PATCH] Fix SDCC support
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25531 Bug ID: 25531 Summary: [Z80][PATCH] Fix SDCC support Product: binutils Version: unspecified Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gas Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: sergey.belyashov at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 12282 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12282=edit Fix SDCC support Currently GAS cannot compile code like `add a,#<(label)`, because it expect direct memory access, but it is immediate load. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/25519] [PATCH]unique.exp: Update contains_unique_symbol
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25519 Sergey Belyashov changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #1 from Sergey Belyashov --- Already fixed -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/25519] [PATCH]unique.exp: Update contains_unique_symbol
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25519 Sergey Belyashov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com, ||nickc at redhat dot com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/25519] New: [PATCH]unique.exp: Update contains_unique_symbol
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25519 Bug ID: 25519 Summary: [PATCH]unique.exp: Update contains_unique_symbol Product: binutils Version: unspecified Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ld Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: sergey.belyashov at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 12274 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12274=edit Update contains_unique_symbol Since commit 9fc0b501af78b changed symbols from a/b to a_val/b_val, contains_unique_symbol needs adjustment. * testsuite/ld-unique/unique.exp (contains_unique_symbol): Updated. Patch author: H.J.Lu -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/25517] [Z80][PATCH] Use -march=CPU[-EXT][+EXT] instead of lot of options of GAS
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25517 Sergey Belyashov changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #12272|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Comment #1 from Sergey Belyashov --- Created attachment 12273 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12273=edit Add -march option to GAS More strict default CPU selection. Polished help and manual. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/25517] [Z80][PATCH] Use -march=CPU[-EXT][+EXT] instead of lot of options of GAS
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25517 Sergey Belyashov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/25517] New: [Z80][PATCH] Use -march=CPU[-EXT][+EXT] instead of lot of options of GAS
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25517 Bug ID: 25517 Summary: [Z80][PATCH] Use -march=CPU[-EXT][+EXT] instead of lot of options of GAS Product: binutils Version: unspecified Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: gas Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: sergey.belyashov at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 12272 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12272=edit Add -march option to GAS Historically Z80 GAS port uses options -z80, -r800 and similar to select ISA, and much of -Fins, -Wnud and similar to enable/disable undocumented instructions. This patch replaces all of them by generic option -march=CPU[-EXT...][+EXT...]. Where CPU is one of currently supported by Z80 GAS port CPUs (z80, z180, ez80...) and EXT is one or more of extentions and undocumented instruction mnemonics. For example option -march=Z80-full+sli selects Z80 CPU, removes support for all undocumented instructions, and adds support for instruction SLI. It is not same as in i386 port (idea is taken from there), but little shorter. Also I remove recently added options -gbz80 and -z80n, which are not in any release. All old options are removed from manual and build-in help. But support for them is kept for backward compatibility. I think, it may be removed after several years. All test are updated too. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/25469] [Z80][PATCH] Add support for GBZ80, Z80N CPUs and DWARF
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25469 --- Comment #11 from Sergey Belyashov --- Yes. z80.em contains all necessary. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/25469] [Z80][PATCH] Add support for GBZ80, Z80N CPUs and DWARF
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25469 Sergey Belyashov changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #12251|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Comment #8 from Sergey Belyashov --- Created attachment 12258 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12258=edit Add support GBZ80 and Z80N CPUs. Fix LD tests failures. Temporary remove DWARF support. I cannot fix eh5 test failure. Now no more regressions will be reported. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/25469] [Z80][PATCH] Add support for GBZ80, Z80N CPUs and DWARF
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25469 Sergey Belyashov changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #12249|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Comment #7 from Sergey Belyashov --- Created attachment 12251 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12251=edit Add support GBZ80, Z80N and DWARF. Fix LD tests failures. Fix most of LD test failures!!! Currently only folowing tests fails: - ld-elf/eh5 (I do not know why, and how to fix) - ld-elf/merge (Z80 target cannot relocate cross-segment subtractions) - ld-elf/pr22450 (.dc.a allocates 16-bit value (it is correct for Z80), but not 32 as expected) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/25469] [Z80][PATCH] Add support for GBZ80, Z80N CPUs and DWARF
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25469 Sergey Belyashov changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[Z80][PATCH] Add support|[Z80][PATCH] Add support |for GameBoy Z80 CPU and |for GBZ80, Z80N CPUs and |.cfi directives |DWARF -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/25469] [Z80][PATCH] Add support for GameBoy Z80 CPU and .cfi directives
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25469 Sergey Belyashov changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #12242|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Comment #6 from Sergey Belyashov --- Created attachment 12249 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12249=edit Add support GBZ80, Z80N CPUs and DWARF Fix one test (used label name `a', which is Z80 register name) eh5 test is still failed (it is new test, which is enabled after enabling of DWARF). I think, problem is another place. For example, elf/discard tests fails due to silence of linker (test expects warning). Linker silently succeed due to discarding of symbol which should go to discard section. I think, same bug causes failure of PR 10549 (GNU OS ABI on STB_GNU_UNIQUE). I completely do not understand what happens there. Moreover, there are two assertion fails in four places of testsuit: ./ld-new: BFD (GNU Binutils) 2.34.50.20200127 assertion fail ../../bfd/elf.c:3550 ./ld-new: BFD (GNU Binutils) 2.34.50.20200127 assertion fail ../../bfd/elf.c:3655 This change patch no regressions (at least, detectible by tests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/25469] [Z80][PATCH] Add support for GameBoy Z80 CPU and .cfi directives
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25469 Sergey Belyashov changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #12238|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Comment #5 from Sergey Belyashov --- Created attachment 12242 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12242=edit Add support GBZ80 and Z80N Fix COFF linker test failures I have no idea how to fix ld-elf/eh5 test failure. It is new test which was enabled when I enable DWARF generation for Z80 target. There is part of log: regexp "^0+01(58|70) 0+0014 0+01(5c|74) FDE cie=0+ pc=.*$" line "0158 0010 CIE" regexp "^ DW_CFA_advance_loc: 4 to .*$" line " Version: 1" regexp "^ DW_CFA_def_cfa: r0(.*) ofs 16$" line " Augmentation: "zR"" regexp "^ DW_CFA_nop$" line " Code alignment factor: 1" regexp "^ DW_CFA_nop$" line " Data alignment factor: -1" regexp "^ DW_CFA_nop$" line " Return address column: 7" regexp "^0+01(70|88) 0+0014 0+0(01c|148|15c) FDE cie=0+0(02c|030|170) pc=.*$" line " Augmentation data: 0b" regexp "^ DW_CFA_advance_loc: 4 to .*$" line " DW_CFA_nop" regexp "^ DW_CFA_def_cfa: r0(.*) ofs 16$" line " DW_CFA_nop" ... I have no expirience in DWARF. Can somebody helps me? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/25469] [Z80][PATCH] Add support for GameBoy Z80 CPU and .cfi directives
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25469 Sergey Belyashov changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #12237|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Comment #3 from Sergey Belyashov --- Created attachment 12238 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12238=edit Add support GBZ80 and Z80N Fix new relocation Add LD test for new relocation -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/25469] [Z80][PATCH] Add support for GameBoy Z80 CPU and .cfi directives
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25469 Sergey Belyashov changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #12236|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Comment #2 from Sergey Belyashov --- Created attachment 12237 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12237=edit Add GBZ80 and Z80N support, gcsections, and DWARF Add support for Z80N (Z80 Next) CPU. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/25469] [Z80][PATCH] Add support for GameBoy Z80 CPU and .cfi directives
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25469 Sergey Belyashov changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[Z80][PATCH] Add support|[Z80][PATCH] Add support |for GameBoy Z80 CPU |for GameBoy Z80 CPU and ||.cfi directives -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/25469] [Z80][PATCH] Add support for GameBoy Z80 CPU
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25469 Sergey Belyashov changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #12232|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Comment #1 from Sergey Belyashov --- Created attachment 12236 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12236=edit Complete GBZ80 support, gcsections, DWARF Add define to enable gc-sections support (but linker warns, that --gc-sections option is ignored, I do not know why). Add support for DWARF (enables some tests, one of which (eh5) fails). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/25469] [Z80][PATCH] Add support for GameBoy Z80 CPU
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25469 Sergey Belyashov changed: What|Removed |Added Target||z80-unknown-* CC||nickc at redhat dot com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/25469] New: [Z80][PATCH] Add support for GameBoy Z80 CPU
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25469 Bug ID: 25469 Summary: [Z80][PATCH] Add support for GameBoy Z80 CPU Product: binutils Version: unspecified Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: gas Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: sergey.belyashov at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 12232 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12232=edit Add support GBZ80 This patch completes support for GameBoy Z80 CPU. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/17054] Z80 assembler does not support the 'defm' directive
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17054 Sergey Belyashov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment #1 from Sergey Belyashov --- Please close as fixed: https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=6655dba246bd164d953fe220a0e3d4eed85bb268 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/25377] [Z80][PATCH] 16 bit FP support and documentation update
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25377 Sergey Belyashov changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #12197|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Comment #2 from Sergey Belyashov --- Created attachment 12198 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12198=edit 16 bit FP support and documentation update Fix some failing GAS tests -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/25377] [Z80][PATCH] 16 bit FP support and documentation update
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25377 Sergey Belyashov changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #12191|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Comment #1 from Sergey Belyashov --- Created attachment 12197 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12197=edit 16 bit FP support and documentation update Fixed tests. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/25377] [Z80][PATCH] 16 bit FP support and documentation update
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25377 Sergey Belyashov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at sourceware dot org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/25377] [Z80][PATCH] 16 bit FP support and documentation update
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25377 Sergey Belyashov changed: What|Removed |Added Target||z80-unknown-* Severity|normal |enhancement -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/25377] New: [Z80][PATCH] 16 bit FP support and documentation update
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25377 Bug ID: 25377 Summary: [Z80][PATCH] 16 bit FP support and documentation update Product: binutils Version: 2.34 (HEAD) Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gas Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: sergey.belyashov at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 12191 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12191=edit 16 bit FP support and documentation update This patch: * fix incorrect disassemble of invalid eZ80 opcode prefix sequence (now emitted ".db" instead of "nop") * add test for fix above * add support for half precision FP numbers (16 bit, ieee754 compatible) * update GAS documentation -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/25224] [Z80][PATCH] Add support for Zilog Z180 and eZ80 CPUs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25224 --- Comment #29 from Sergey Belyashov --- Created attachment 12180 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12180=edit Fix build on aarch64 Yes, you are right. data defined as signed char data[6]; -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/25344] z80 disassembler recursion
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25344 --- Comment #6 from Sergey Belyashov --- Created attachment 12179 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12179=edit Correct disassembly of incorrect opcode prefixes This patch fixes incorrect disassembly of extra opcode prefixes. Now them disassembled as .db directive as described in comment #3. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/25224] [Z80][PATCH] Add support for Zilog Z180 and eZ80 CPUs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25224 --- Comment #23 from Sergey Belyashov --- Created attachment 12177 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12177=edit Fix warning This patch fixes all places where character literal defined by '\xXX' form is compared with character variable. (I was surprized, that character literals has integer type in C) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/25344] z80 disassembler recursion
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25344 --- Comment #3 from Sergey Belyashov --- Looks good. I suggest to change printing of "nop ;%s" by ".db 0x%02x ; nop" in case of double prefix. Or I may to do it later. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/25344] z80 disassembler recursion
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25344 --- Comment #1 from Sergey Belyashov --- You are right. 0x40, 0x49, 0x52 and 0x5b are ez80 opcode prefixes which changes memory model of next instruction. 0x40 + 0x40 is impossible opcode. I will fix it soon (within a week). You may try fix it. Move lines placed at end of suffix() (opcodes/z80.c): buf_in->n_used += buf.n_used; buf_in->n_fetch += buf.n_fetch; before: if (*p == '.') /* suffix already present */ It should fix error. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/25224] [Z80][PATCH] Add support for Zilog Z180 and eZ80 CPUs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25224 Sergey Belyashov changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #12152|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Comment #17 from Sergey Belyashov --- Created attachment 12154 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12154=edit Add support for Z180 and eZ80 to bfd/gas/binutils/ld Fix error, which causes invalid machine flags when linking to ELF output. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/25224] [Z80][PATCH] Add support for Zilog Z180 and eZ80 CPUs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25224 Sergey Belyashov changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #12150|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Comment #16 from Sergey Belyashov --- Created attachment 12152 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12152=edit Add support for Z180 and eZ80 to bfd/gas/binutils/ld Small fixes. Reduced number of subpatches -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/25224] [Z80][PATCH] Add support for Zilog Z180 and eZ80 CPUs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25224 Sergey Belyashov changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/25224] [Z80][PATCH] Add support for Zilog Z180 and eZ80 CPUs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25224 Sergey Belyashov changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #12143|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Comment #15 from Sergey Belyashov --- Created attachment 12150 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12150=edit Add support for Z180 and eZ80 to bfd/gas/binutils/ld Fix readelf (fixes much failed elf tests) Add floating number support Improve SDCC compatibility -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/25311] [PATCH] Replace macro NO_STRING_ESCAPES
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25311 Sergey Belyashov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amodra at gmail dot com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/25311] New: [PATCH] Replace macro NO_STRING_ESCAPES
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25311 Bug ID: 25311 Summary: [PATCH] Replace macro NO_STRING_ESCAPES Product: binutils Version: 2.34 (HEAD) Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: gas Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: sergey.belyashov at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 12144 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12144=edit Replaces NO_STRING_ESCAPES by TC_STRING_ESCAPES Currently there is no way to disable/enable string escaping by backslash from command line. Most of targers enables string escaping, but two are not (z80 and ppc-coff). Implementing support for Z80-ELF target I cannot pass much of GAS and LD tests because most of them use backslash escaping inside strings (mostly .ascii "...\0"). Current patch replaces NO_STRING_ESCAPES by macro TC_STRING_ESCAPES. By default if not defined it equals to 1. For targets Z80 and PPC-COFF it is defined to 0. But it can be defined as function call. So it is more flexible as current way. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/25224] [Z80][PATCH] Add support for Zilog Z180 and eZ80 CPUs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25224 Sergey Belyashov changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #12142|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Comment #14 from Sergey Belyashov --- Created attachment 12143 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12143=edit Add support for Z180 and eZ80 to bfd/gas/binutils/ld Added option to set non-standard local label prefix (for example underscore). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/25224] [Z80][PATCH] Add support for Zilog Z180 and eZ80 CPUs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25224 Sergey Belyashov changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #12137|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Comment #13 from Sergey Belyashov --- Created attachment 12142 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12142=edit Add support for Z180 and eZ80 to bfd/gas/binutils/ld Fixed version of previous patch -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/25224] [Z80][PATCH] Add support for Zilog Z180 and eZ80 CPUs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25224 Sergey Belyashov changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #12136|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Comment #12 from Sergey Belyashov --- Created attachment 12137 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12137=edit Add support for Z180 and eZ80 to bfd/gas/binutils/ld Fixed fail of some tests -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/25224] [Z80][PATCH] Add support for Zilog Z180 and eZ80 CPUs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25224 Sergey Belyashov changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #12132|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Comment #11 from Sergey Belyashov --- Created attachment 12136 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12136=edit Add support for Z180 and eZ80 to bfd/gas/binutils/ld Fixed failing common tests, so now z80-coff passes all GAS tests. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/25224] [Z80][PATCH] Add support for Zilog Z180 and eZ80 CPUs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25224 Sergey Belyashov changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #12127|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Comment #10 from Sergey Belyashov --- Created attachment 12132 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12132=edit Add support for Z180 and eZ80 to bfd/gas/binutils/ld This is commulative patch with ChangeLog and NEWS files -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/25224] [Z80][PATCH] Add support for Zilog Z180 and eZ80 CPUs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25224 Sergey Belyashov changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[Z80][PATCH] Add support|[Z80][PATCH] Add support |for Zylog Z180 and eZ80 |for Zilog Z180 and eZ80 |CPUs|CPUs -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/25224] [Z80][PATCH] Add support for Zilog Z180 and eZ80 CPUs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25224 --- Comment #9 from Sergey Belyashov --- How to provide changes for ChangeLog and NEWS files? They looks like often updated, so my patch will cause conflicts. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/25224] [Z80][PATCH] Add support for Zylog Z180 and eZ80 CPUs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25224 --- Comment #7 from Sergey Belyashov --- What is preffered? 1. join all patches to one 2. keep them as is, but add separate patch for ChangeLog/NEWS files 3. recreate patches with corresponding update of ChangeLog/NEWS files in each patch Should I create separate repository (on github for example) with my changes? Currently I'm fixing incomplete SDCC support (extra relocations required, 90% done)... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/25224] [Z80][PATCH] Add support for Zylog Z180 and eZ80 CPUs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25224 Sergey Belyashov changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #12124|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Comment #5 from Sergey Belyashov --- Created attachment 12127 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12127=edit Add support for Z180 and eZ80 to bfd/gas/binutils/ld Updated BFD32_BACKENDS and BFD32_BACKENDS_CFILES in bfd/Makefile.am. Added SDCC compatibility mode. Now gas may compile files generated by SDCC. There is only one issue: SDCC produces global labels with double colon and local labels with single colon. GAS cannot mark single colon labels as local. So all labels are global. So SDCC small improvement required (is not duscussion for the thread). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/25224] [Z80][PATCH] Add support for Zylog Z180 and eZ80 CPUs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25224 --- Comment #3 from Sergey Belyashov --- Hi Nick, Can you explain, what do you mean: > Do you have a binutils copyright assignment on file with the FSF ? I need to sign some "papers" or I need to add some headers to files? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/25275] Dollar labels do not work
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25275 Sergey Belyashov changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #1 from Sergey Belyashov --- Sorry, it is caused by unimplemented bfd_is_local_label_name() -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/25275] New: Dollar labels do not work
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25275 Bug ID: 25275 Summary: Dollar labels do not work Product: binutils Version: 2.34 (HEAD) Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gas Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: sergey.belyashov at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- Note: Dollar label is true temporary label which lives between two normal label definition. I trying to compile next Z80 code (z80-unknown-coff, target is not sufficient, but DOLLAR_LOCAL_LABELS should be defined as 1 in target sources: tc-*.h and/or te-*.h): .text .org0 start: di jr 000100$ 000100$: jp .Lbegin ; .Lbegin: ld b,5 000100$: inc a jr z,000101$ djnz000100$ ret 000101$: ret .end $ LC_MESSAGES=C ../as-new -z80 -a test.s test.s: Assembler messages: test.s: Error: local label `"100" (instance number 3 of a dollar label)' is not defined GAS LISTING test.s page 1 1.text 2.org0 3start: 4 F3di 5 18 00 jr 000100$ 6000100$: 7 C3 06 00 jp .Lbegin 8; 9.Lbegin: 10 06 05 ld b,5 11000100$: 12 3Cinc a 13 28 03 jr z,000101$ 14 10 FF djnz000100$ 15 C9ret 16000101$: 17 C9ret 18.end GAS LISTING test.s page 2 DEFINED SYMBOLS *ABS*: fake test.s:3 .text: start UNDEFINED SYMBOLS L1003 Compiler does not known dollar-labels defined before use. Is it OK? Moreover, I try to find any test for dollar-label usage, but it not present. So this feature exists in sources but not tested anythere! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/25224] [Z80][PATCH] Add support for Zylog Z180 and eZ80 CPUs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25224 Sergey Belyashov changed: What|Removed |Added Target||z80-unknown-* Component|binutils|gas -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/25224] [Z80][PATCH] Add support for Zylog Z180 and eZ80 CPUs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25224 Sergey Belyashov changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #12091|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Comment #1 from Sergey Belyashov --- Created attachment 12124 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12124=edit Add support for Z180 and eZ80 to bfd/gas/binutils/ld Updated archive (all patches are enumerated to proper apply order). Also added some linker fixes and support for z80-elf32 target. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/25224] [Z80][PATCH] Add support for Zylog Z180 and eZ80 CPUs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25224 Sergey Belyashov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amodra at gmail dot com, ||nickc at redhat dot com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/21565] Z80: Incorrect linkage of call instructions
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21565 Sergey Belyashov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sergey.belyashov at gmail dot com --- Comment #1 from Sergey Belyashov --- It is correct. Default linker script (*.ld file) contains 0x100 offset for .text. So produces binary should be loaded at address 0x100. It is done for CP/M compatibility (it is described by comment in the *.ld script). You may create your own linker script and place code in any location. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/25224] [Z80][PATCH] Add support for Zylog Z180 and eZ80 CPUs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25224 Sergey Belyashov changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[Z80] Add support for Zylog |[Z80][PATCH] Add support |Z180 and eZ80 CPUs |for Zylog Z180 and eZ80 ||CPUs -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/25224] New: [Z80] Add support for Zylog Z180 and eZ80 CPUs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25224 Bug ID: 25224 Summary: [Z80] Add support for Zylog Z180 and eZ80 CPUs Product: binutils Version: 2.34 (HEAD) Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: sergey.belyashov at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 12091 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12091=edit Add support for GBZ80, Z180, and eZ80 to bfd/gas/binutils There is archive with 3 patches (bfd, disassembler, gas), which add full support for Zylog Z180 and EZ80 CPUs to Z80 arch. Summary changes: 1. Due to limited number of COFF flags used to identify MACH earlier mask configuration were changes to enumeration. Old values for bfd_mach_z80* are kept. 2. Support for GBZ80 (Game Boy Z80 - Z80 with reduced instruction set) is in initial state, may be later be completed by some one. 3. Undocumented instructions may be enabled/disabled on per target basis, i.e. you may enable SLI instruction for EZ80, but not all "unportable" instructions. 4. Number of dump columns is increased (longest EZ80 instruction is 6 bytes). Note: I suggest to completely remove z80strict and z80full maches: bfd_mach_z80 - Z80 with some undocumented instructions (common for Z80 and R800) bfd_mach_z80strict - Z80 with documented instructions only bfd_mach_z80full - Z80 with all undocumented instructions Classic Zylog Z80 supports all undocumented instructions. Later CPUs may support or not them, but in most cases them have new instructions, so new mach is required. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
