[Bug binutils/11037] invalid code generation depending on code position

[amodra at bigpond dot net dot au]

--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au  2009-12-08 
01:23 ---
Ah ha!  I wanted to get rid of seg_left == undefined_section too, but hadn't
spotted the problem with local symbols.  Your patch looks good except for the
calls to local_symbol_convert, which are unnecessary work and memory usage.

-- 
   What|Removed |Added

  Component|gas |binutils


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11037

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug binutils/11037] invalid code generation depending on code position

[hjl dot tools at gmail dot com]

--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com  2009-12-05 
03:38 ---
It is a regression. Binutils 2.19 works correctly.

-- 
   What|Removed |Added

 CC||hjl dot tools at gmail dot
   ||com


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11037

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug binutils/11037] invalid code generation depending on code position

[amodra at bigpond dot net dot au]

-- 
   What|Removed |Added

 GCC target triplet||i486-*


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11037

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils