[Bug binutils/12451] --build-id regression

2011-01-28 Thread jakub at redhat dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12451

Jakub Jelinek jakub at redhat dot com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||nickc at redhat dot com,
   ||roland at redhat dot com

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug binutils/12451] --build-id regression

2011-01-28 Thread jakub at redhat dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12451

--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at redhat dot com 2011-01-28 14:33:48 
UTC ---
Actually, it seems upstream binutils probably never handled it right and it
seems Fedora had some local patch for it that got dropped as redundant when it
actually has never been redundant.
In elf_checksum_contents it checksums contents of sections guarded with
if (i_shdr.contents)
Except, at least in my testing, i_shdr.contents is always NULL so it only
checksums section headers, program headers and ELF header.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils