[Bug binutils/21589] heap-buffer-overflow in bfd_getl64
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21589 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC||nickc at redhat dot com Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #5 from Nick Clifton --- Hi Aadamski, Thanks for reporting this bug. There were several places in the VMS parsing code where potential address violations could happen. I have checked in a patch which I hope will address them all. Cheers Nick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/21589] heap-buffer-overflow in bfd_getl64
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21589 --- Comment #4 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=c53d2e6d744da000aaafe0237bced090aab62818 commit c53d2e6d744da000aaafe0237bced090aab62818 Author: Nick Clifton Date: Wed Jun 14 11:27:15 2017 +0100 Fix potential address violations when processing a corrupt Alpha VMA binary. PR binutils/21589 * vms-alpha.c (_bfd_vms_get_value): Add an extra parameter - the maximum value for the ascic pointer. Check that name processing does not read beyond this value. (_bfd_vms_slurp_etir): Add checks for attempts to read beyond the end of etir record. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/21589] heap-buffer-overflow in bfd_getl64
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21589 --- Comment #3 from aadamski at quarkslab dot com --- Additional Information: The command used was `objdump -D `. The compilation flags used were `-g -O2 -fno-omit-frame-pointer -fsanitize=address -fno-sanitize-recover=undefined`. The configuration settings used were `--enable-targets=all --disable-shared`. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/21589] heap-buffer-overflow in bfd_getl64
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21589 --- Comment #2 from aadamski at quarkslab dot com --- Created attachment 10125 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10125&action=edit report -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/21589] heap-buffer-overflow in bfd_getl64
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21589 --- Comment #1 from aadamski at quarkslab dot com --- Created attachment 10124 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10124&action=edit testcase -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
