[Bug binutils/29042] [2.38 regression] opcodes libtool regression (relinks libopcodes during install, picks up wrong libiberty from system)
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29042 --- Comment #8 from Sam James --- See also https://inbox.sourceware.org/binutils/20230228224937.3832887-1-dilfri...@gentoo.org/. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/29042] [2.38 regression] opcodes libtool regression (relinks libopcodes during install, picks up wrong libiberty from system)
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29042 --- Comment #7 from Maciej W. Rozycki --- (In reply to Toolybird from comment #4) > Problem goes away with `make -j1 ...install'. I noticed this while > investigating issues of reproducibility. > > A lot of build systems put "-j (n>1)" globally into MAKEFLAGS. What is the > common wisdom here? Always `make install' binutils with -j1 ? This indicates we're missing a Makefile dependency for an `install' target and a race occurs. Also what are the contents of libbfd.la in the failed link? NB I think having non-PIC libiberty.a installed system-wide with no corresponding libiberty.so DSO is a system misconfiguration (but we're supposed to cope anyway). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/29042] [2.38 regression] opcodes libtool regression (relinks libopcodes during install, picks up wrong libiberty from system)
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29042 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2023-03-01 Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/29042] [2.38 regression] opcodes libtool regression (relinks libopcodes during install, picks up wrong libiberty from system)
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29042 Andreas K. Huettel changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dilfridge at gentoo dot org --- Comment #6 from Andreas K. Huettel --- Created attachment 14709 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14709=edit experimental patch Please test this experimental patch. It tries to apply a similar hack as was previously done to libctf to libopcodes and libgprofng. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/29042] [2.38 regression] opcodes libtool regression (relinks libopcodes during install, picks up wrong libiberty from system)
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29042 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|opcodes libtool regression |[2.38 regression] opcodes |(relinks libopcodes during |libtool regression (relinks |install, picks up wrong |libopcodes during install, |libiberty from system) |picks up wrong libiberty ||from system) CC||toolchain at gentoo dot org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
