[Bug binutils/30016] strip/objcopy should do atomic renames

[sch...@linux-m68k.org]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30016

--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab  ---
This is deliberate.  A rename requires careful duplication of the attributes of
the target file, which is difficult to get right.  See PR27456.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug binutils/30016] strip/objcopy should do atomic renames

[thiago at kde dot org]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30016

--- Comment #2 from Thiago Macieira  ---
(In reply to Andreas Schwab from comment #1)
> This is deliberate.  A rename requires careful duplication of the attributes
> of the target file, which is difficult to get right.  See PR27456.

Are you sure of the number? That's a build failure on Windows.

Anyway, I understand some internal details of the file may depend on the file
name (on some architectures), but why can't the correct content be written to a
temporary file instead of the final one?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug binutils/30016] strip/objcopy should do atomic renames

[sam at gentoo dot org]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30016

Sam James  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||sam at gentoo dot org

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.