[Bug binutils/4781] binutils 2.17.50.0.7 and later eats up memory when calling gnujava wizards in OpenOffice
--- Additional Comments From jakub at redhat dot com 2007-07-31 08:37 --- I don't see anything wrong on the generated .eh_frame, it is properly terminated, seems to cover everything it should and .eh_frame_hdr looks sane as well. So this definitely doesn't look like a binutils issue. What I'd try is back out http://sources.redhat.com/ml/glibc-cvs/2006-q4/msg00364.html in glibc sources, see http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2006-12/msg00293.html -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4781 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/4781] binutils 2.17.50.0.7 and later eats up memory when calling gnujava wizards in OpenOffice
--- Additional Comments From andyradke at web dot de 2007-07-31 19:25 --- yes. you have successfully located the issue! reverting the clone.S.diff for x86_64 in glibc fixed it. can you make sure and help that it will be fixed in glibc before 2.6.1 release? you seem to be much more involved there. thanks so far. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4781 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/4781] binutils 2.17.50.0.7 and later eats up memory when calling gnujava wizards in OpenOffice
--- Additional Comments From andyradke at web dot de 2007-07-27 19:27 --- anything missing? -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4781 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/4781] binutils 2.17.50.0.7 and later eats up memory when calling gnujava wizards in OpenOffice
--- Additional Comments From andyradke at web dot de 2007-07-24 21:45 --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] glibc]$ gcc -print-file-name=libgcc.a /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.2.1/libgcc.a [EMAIL PROTECTED] glibc-build]$ gcc -v -shared -static-libgcc -Wl,-O1 -Wl,-z,defs -Wl,-dynamic-linker=/lib/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 -B/var/abs/chroot/current/var/abs/base/glibc/src/glibc-2.6/glibc-build/csu/ -Wl,--version-script=/var/abs/chroot/current/var/abs/base/glibc/src/glibc-2.6/glibc-build/libc.map -Wl,-soname=libc.so.6 -Wl,-z,combreloc -Wl,-z,relro -Wl,--hash-style=both -nostdlib -nostartfiles -e __libc_main -Wl,-z,now -L/var/abs/chroot/current/var/abs/base/glibc/src/glibc-2.6/glibc-build -L/var/abs/chroot/current/var/abs/base/glibc/src/glibc-2.6/glibc-build/math -L/var/abs/chroot/current/var/abs/base/glibc/src/glibc-2.6/glibc-build/elf -L/var/abs/chroot/current/var/abs/base/glibc/src/glibc-2.6/glibc-build/dlfcn -L/var/abs/chroot/current/var/abs/base/glibc/src/glibc-2.6/glibc-build/nss -L/var/abs/chroot/current/var/abs/base/glibc/src/glibc-2.6/glibc-build/nis -L/var/abs/chroot/current/var/abs/base/glibc/src/glibc-2.6/glibc-build/rt -L/var/abs/chroot/current/var/abs/base/glibc/src/glibc-2.6/glibc-build/resolv -L/var/abs/chroot/current/var/abs/base/glibc/src/glibc-2.6/glibc-build/crypt -L/var/abs/chroot/current/var/abs/base/glibc/src/glibc-2.6/glibc-build/nptl -Wl,-rpath-link=/var/abs/chroot/current/var/abs/base/glibc/src/glibc-2.6/glibc-build:/var/abs/chroot/current/var/abs/base/glibc/src/glibc-2.6/glibc-build/math:/var/abs/chroot/current/var/abs/base/glibc/src/glibc-2.6/glibc-build/elf:/var/abs/chroot/current/var/abs/base/glibc/src/glibc-2.6/glibc-build/dlfcn:/var/abs/chroot/current/var/abs/base/glibc/src/glibc-2.6/glibc-build/nss:/var/abs/chroot/current/var/abs/base/glibc/src/glibc-2.6/glibc-build/nis:/var/abs/chroot/current/var/abs/base/glibc/src/glibc-2.6/glibc-build/rt:/var/abs/chroot/current/var/abs/base/glibc/src/glibc-2.6/glibc-build/resolv:/var/abs/chroot/current/var/abs/base/glibc/src/glibc-2.6/glibc-build/crypt:/var/abs/chroot/current/var/abs/base/glibc/src/glibc-2.6/glibc-build/nptl -o /var/abs/chroot/current/var/abs/base/glibc/src/glibc-2.6/glibc-build/libc.so -T /var/abs/chroot/current/var/abs/base/glibc/src/glibc-2.6/glibc-build/shlib.lds /var/abs/chroot/current/var/abs/base/glibc/src/glibc-2.6/glibc-build/csu/abi-note.o /var/abs/chroot/current/var/abs/base/glibc/src/glibc-2.6/glibc-build/elf/soinit.os /var/abs/chroot/current/var/abs/base/glibc/src/glibc-2.6/glibc-build/libc_pic.os /var/abs/chroot/current/var/abs/base/glibc/src/glibc-2.6/glibc-build/elf/sofini.os /var/abs/chroot/current/var/abs/base/glibc/src/glibc-2.6/glibc-build/elf/interp.os /var/abs/chroot/current/var/abs/base/glibc/src/glibc-2.6/glibc-build/elf/ld.so -lgcc Es werden eingebaute Spezifikationen verwendet. Ziel: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Konfiguriert mit: ../configure --prefix=/usr --enable-shared --enable-languages=c,c++,objc --enable-threads=posix --enable-__cxa_atexit --disable-multilib --libdir=/usr/lib --libexecdir=/usr/lib --enable-clocale=gnu --disable-libstdcxx-pch --with-tune=generic Thread-Modell: posix gcc-Version 4.2.1 20070704 (prerelease) /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.2.1/collect2 --eh-frame-hdr -m elf_x86_64 --hash-style=both -shared -o /var/abs/chroot/current/var/abs/base/glibc/src/glibc-2.6/glibc-build/libc.so -e __libc_main -L/var/abs/chroot/current/var/abs/base/glibc/src/glibc-2.6/glibc-build -L/var/abs/chroot/current/var/abs/base/glibc/src/glibc-2.6/glibc-build/math -L/var/abs/chroot/current/var/abs/base/glibc/src/glibc-2.6/glibc-build/elf -L/var/abs/chroot/current/var/abs/base/glibc/src/glibc-2.6/glibc-build/dlfcn -L/var/abs/chroot/current/var/abs/base/glibc/src/glibc-2.6/glibc-build/nss -L/var/abs/chroot/current/var/abs/base/glibc/src/glibc-2.6/glibc-build/nis -L/var/abs/chroot/current/var/abs/base/glibc/src/glibc-2.6/glibc-build/rt -L/var/abs/chroot/current/var/abs/base/glibc/src/glibc-2.6/glibc-build/resolv -L/var/abs/chroot/current/var/abs/base/glibc/src/glibc-2.6/glibc-build/crypt -L/var/abs/chroot/current/var/abs/base/glibc/src/glibc-2.6/glibc-build/nptl -L/var/abs/chroot/current/var/abs/base/glibc/src/glibc-2.6/glibc-build/csu -L/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.2.1 -L/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.2.1 -L/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.2.1/../../../../lib -L/lib/../lib -L/usr/lib/../lib -L/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.2.1/../../.. -O1 -z defs -dynamic-linker=/lib/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 --version-script=/var/abs/chroot/current/var/abs/base/glibc/src/glibc-2.6/glibc-build/libc.map -soname=libc.so.6 -z combreloc -z relro --hash-style=both -z now
[Bug binutils/4781] binutils 2.17.50.0.7 and later eats up memory when calling gnujava wizards in OpenOffice
--- Additional Comments From andyradke at web dot de 2007-07-24 22:00 --- due to size limit the files are just going to http://archlinux.org/~andyrtr/wanted_files.tar.bz2 -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4781 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/4781] binutils 2.17.50.0.7 and later eats up memory when calling gnujava wizards in OpenOffice
--- Additional Comments From jakub at redhat dot com 2007-07-23 13:39 --- If you get an 8 byte .eh_frame_hdr section in the linked libc.so, then I'd like an reproducer from you, because all my x86_64 glibcs are just fine when compiled with recent (e.g. 2.17.50.0.12) binutils. So, please pack up: elf/ld.so libc.map libc_pic.a libc_pic.os shlib.lds csu/abi-note.o elf/soinit.os elf/sofini.os elf/interp.os in your glibc build directory and your `gcc -print-file-name=libgcc.a` and attach it as a bzip2ed tarball here as attachment. Also mention the exact ld command line that was used to link your libc.so - rerun the gcc -shared -static-libgcc -o /libc.so command from your glibc build log with additional -v and past the collect2 command line here. Thanks. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4781 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/4781] binutils 2.17.50.0.7 and later eats up memory when calling gnujava wizards in OpenOffice
--- Additional Comments From andyradke at web dot de 2007-07-21 13:54 --- hm. too much commits that i could test out each one of them. i checked again and used this time Sun's Java and don't have any problems. So can this also be a bug in GNUjava from gcc-gcj that is introduced when using binutils from 2.17.50.0.7 or higher? with GNUjava i could reproduce it also outside OpenOffice.org when using the gnujava Firefox browser plugin on any website. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4781 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/4781] binutils 2.17.50.0.7 and later eats up memory when calling gnujava wizards in OpenOffice
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-07-21 14:04 --- (In reply to comment #9) hm. too much commits that i could test out each one of them. There are about 200 commits between 2006-10-20 and 2006-11-27. It takes about 8 tries to find which commit causes this regression with binary search. I don't think it is too much. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4781 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/4781] binutils 2.17.50.0.7 and later eats up memory when calling gnujava wizards in OpenOffice
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-07-21 14:25 --- (In reply to comment #11) i know the way you want to show me. is there an easy way to just download/checkout let's say the first 100 commited patches? (compile time isn't an issue, system is really fast but has slow internet connection) From http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2006-10/ it looks like October 31, 2006 22:59 UTC hasthe first 100 patches from 2006-10-20 to 2006-11-27. I can do # cvs -z 3 -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs/src co -D October 31, 2006 22:59 UTC binutils to check it out. You can use the same command with a different time for -D to update your tree to a different time, like # cvs -z 3 -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs/src co -D November 27, 2006 22:05 UTC binutils will update your tree to November 27, 2006 22:05 UTC. Since you don't need to check out the whole tree after the first check out, incremental check out isn't very slow. Also you can rsync CVS repository: http://sources.redhat.com/sourceware/rsync.html so that you check it out locally. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4781 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/4781] binutils 2.17.50.0.7 and later eats up memory when calling gnujava wizards in OpenOffice
--- Additional Comments From andyradke at web dot de 2007-07-21 16:30 --- ok, i could track down the issue due to the commits from 22th Nov. 2006. cvs co from 21st worked well and from 22nd has the memory issues. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4781 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/4781] binutils 2.17.50.0.7 and later eats up memory when calling gnujava wizards in OpenOffice
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-07-21 16:55 --- (In reply to comment #13) ok, i could track down the issue due to the commits from 22th Nov. 2006. cvs co from 21st worked well and from 22nd has the memory issues. Please use http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2006-11/ to find the exact time for each change made on Nov. 22, 2006 and locate the exact change which causes this regression. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4781 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/4781] binutils 2.17.50.0.7 and later eats up memory when calling gnujava wizards in OpenOffice
--- Additional Comments From andyradke at web dot de 2007-07-21 20:39 --- ok, i got it located. it's this commit: http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2006-11/msg00100.html -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4781 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/4781] binutils 2.17.50.0.7 and later eats up memory when calling gnujava wizards in OpenOffice
--- Additional Comments From andyradke at web dot de 2007-07-18 10:45 --- yes, the only difference in the glibc pkg is the binutils pkg it is built against. nothing else. http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/binutils/ChangeLog.diff?r1=1.r2=1.1108cvsroot=srcf=h is this list complete? then it should be on of the readelf.c changes. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4781 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/4781] binutils 2.17.50.0.7 and later eats up memory when calling gnujava wizards in OpenOffice
--- Additional Comments From andyradke at web dot de 2007-07-12 07:33 --- with last working version .06: http://pastebin.archlinux.org/9374 broken recent .17: http://pastebin.archlinux.org/9375 -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4781 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/4781] binutils 2.17.50.0.7 and later eats up memory when calling gnujava wizards in OpenOffice
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-07-12 15:45 --- (In reply to comment #2) with last working version .06: http://pastebin.archlinux.org/9374 broken recent .17: http://pastebin.archlinux.org/9375 When you copy /lib64/libc.so.6 from the good machine to the bad machine, does the bad machine work? When you copy /lib64/libc.so.6 from the good machine to the bad machine, does the good machine work? -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4781 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/4781] binutils 2.17.50.0.7 and later eats up memory when calling gnujava wizards in OpenOffice
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-07-12 16:00 --- It is just a guess. It may be related to http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2006-11/msg00178.html Can you back it out from 2.17.50.0.7 and give it a try? -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4781 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/4781] binutils 2.17.50.0.7 and later eats up memory when calling gnujava wizards in OpenOffice
--- Additional Comments From andyradke at web dot de 2007-07-12 21:20 --- both failed here: replacing libc.so.6 breaks the system completly. no command will work anymore. i could revert the patch cleaning out some parts. but now binutils won't build anymore claiming problems with struct cie. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4781 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/4781] binutils 2.17.50.0.7 and later eats up memory when calling gnujava wizards in OpenOffice
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-07-12 02:31 --- Please show your the outputs of readelf -lS --wide on bad and good /lib64/libc.so.6. -- What|Removed |Added CC||hjl at lucon dot org http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4781 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
