Re: [Bug binutils/9769] [Build failure] tm struct tm_gmtoff field build error

2009-01-21 Thread Douglas B Rupp

nickc at redhat dot com wrote:

--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com  2009-01-21 11:57 
---
Hi Pierre,

  Actually I can see no good reason for using this unsupported field, so I am
going to check in the attached patch to remove its use.


The reason for the field was so that code cross compiled on a Unix 
filesytem NFS mounted on VMS, could be debugged using the native VMS 
debugger. I'll try to rework it.



___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug binutils/9769] [Build failure] tm struct tm_gmtoff field build error

2009-01-21 Thread rupp at gnat dot com

--- Additional Comments From rupp at gnat dot com  2009-01-21 17:11 ---
Subject: Re:  [Build failure] tm struct tm_gmtoff field
 build  error

nickc at redhat dot com wrote:
> --- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com  2009-01-21 11:57 
> ---
> Hi Pierre,
> 
>   Actually I can see no good reason for using this unsupported field, so I am
> going to check in the attached patch to remove its use.

The reason for the field was so that code cross compiled on a Unix 
filesytem NFS mounted on VMS, could be debugged using the native VMS 
debugger. I'll try to rework it.


-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9769

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug binutils/9769] [Build failure] tm struct tm_gmtoff field build error

2009-01-21 Thread schwab at suse dot de

--- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de  2009-01-21 12:43 ---
Subject: Re:  [Build failure] tm struct tm_gmtoff field build error

"nickc at redhat dot com"  writes:

>   Actually I can see no good reason for using this unsupported field, so I am
> going to check in the attached patch to remove its use.

The result of localtime is now unused.  Also, the use of st_mtim is
nonportable, too.

Andreas.



-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9769

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


Re: [Bug binutils/9769] [Build failure] tm struct tm_gmtoff field build error

2009-01-21 Thread Andreas Schwab
"nickc at redhat dot com"  writes:

>   Actually I can see no good reason for using this unsupported field, so I am
> going to check in the attached patch to remove its use.

The result of localtime is now unused.  Also, the use of st_mtim is
nonportable, too.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, sch...@suse.de
SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
PGP key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug binutils/9769] [Build failure] tm struct tm_gmtoff field build error

2009-01-21 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-01-21 
11:58 ---
Subject: Bug 9769

CVSROOT:/cvs/src
Module name:src
Changes by: ni...@sourceware.org2009-01-21 11:58:05

Modified files:
bfd: ChangeLog vmsutil.c 

Log message:
PR 9769
* vmsutil.c (vms_file_stats_name): Remove use of unsupported
tm_gmtoff field in struct tm.

Patches:
http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/bfd/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=src&r1=1.4431&r2=1.4432
http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/bfd/vmsutil.c.diff?cvsroot=src&r1=1.1&r2=1.2



-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9769

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug binutils/9769] [Build failure] tm struct tm_gmtoff field build error

2009-01-21 Thread nickc at redhat dot com

--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com  2009-01-21 11:57 
---
Hi Pierre,

  Actually I can see no good reason for using this unsupported field, so I am
going to check in the attached patch to remove its use.

Cheers
  Nick

bfd/ChangeLog
2009-01-21  Nick Clifton  

PR 9769
* vmsutil.c (vms_file_stats_name): Remove use of unsupported
tm_gmtoff field in struct tm.


-- 
   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9769

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug binutils/9769] [Build failure] tm struct tm_gmtoff field build error

2009-01-21 Thread nickc at redhat dot com

--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com  2009-01-21 11:56 
---
Created an attachment (id=3676)
 --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3676&action=view)
Remoev use of tm_gmtoff


-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9769

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils