[Bug gas/11509] Strange evaluation of symbol containing register
--- Additional Comments From theorizer at freemail dot hu 2010-04-24 17:19 --- Thanks that you convinced yourself that it is a bug and fixed it :-). I tested your patch with 2.20.51.20100424 and it is working fine. Thanks again. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11509 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/11509] Strange evaluation of symbol containing register
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-21 18:10 --- Subject: Bug 11509 CVSROOT:/cvs/src Module name:src Changes by: h...@sourceware.org 2010-04-21 18:09:53 Modified files: gas: ChangeLog read.c gas/config : tc-i386-intel.c tc-i386.c gas/testsuite : ChangeLog gas/testsuite/gas/i386: equ.d equ.s Log message: Properly handle ".equ symbol, reg + NUM" in x86 Intel syntax. gas/ 2010-04-21 H.J. Lu PR gas/11509 * config/tc-i386-intel.c (i386_intel_simplify_register): New. (i386_intel_simplify): Use i386_is_register and i386_intel_simplify_register. Set X_md for O_register and check X_md for O_constant. (i386_intel_operand): Use i386_is_register. * config/tc-i386.c (i386_is_register): New. (x86_cons): Initialize the X_md field. Use i386_is_register. (parse_register): Use i386_is_register. (tc_x86_parse_to_dw2regnum): Likewise. gas/testsuite/ 2010-04-21 H.J. Lu PR gas/11509 * gas/i386/equ.s: Add tests for ".equ symbol, reg + NUM". * gas/i386/equ.d: Updated. Patches: http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/gas/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=src&r1=1.4136&r2=1.4137 http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/gas/read.c.diff?cvsroot=src&r1=1.162&r2=1.163 http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/gas/config/tc-i386-intel.c.diff?cvsroot=src&r1=1.9&r2=1.10 http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/gas/config/tc-i386.c.diff?cvsroot=src&r1=1.431&r2=1.432 http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/gas/testsuite/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=src&r1=1.1657&r2=1.1658 http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/gas/testsuite/gas/i386/equ.d.diff?cvsroot=src&r1=1.3&r2=1.4 http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/gas/testsuite/gas/i386/equ.s.diff?cvsroot=src&r1=1.4&r2=1.5 --- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-04-21 18:26 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11509 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/11509] Strange evaluation of symbol containing register
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-04-20 21:17 --- This test failed: [...@gnu-6 pr11509]$ cat 1.s .intel_syntax noprefix .eqv param, ebp-4 [...@gnu-6 pr11509]$ ./as --32 -o 1.o 1.s 1.s: Assembler messages: 1.s:3: Error: can't make global register symbol `param' [...@gnu-6 pr11509]$ I think it is a bad idea to use ".eqv param, ebp-4". -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11509 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/11509] Strange evaluation of symbol containing register
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-04-19 14:37 --- I don't think we should support ".eqv param, ebp-4" since it is evaluated and fully resolved at the first use. We got ".eqv param, -4" starting from the second use. -- What|Removed |Added GCC build triplet|x86_64-gentoo-linux, x86_32-| |gentoo-linux, cygwin| GCC host triplet|x86_64-gentoo-linux, x86_32-| |gentoo-linux, cygwin| GCC target triplet|x86_64-gentoo-linux, x86_32-|i386/x86-64 |gentoo-linux, cygwin| Version|2.20|2.21 (HEAD) http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11509 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
