[Bug gas/25469] [Z80][PATCH] Add support for GameBoy Z80 CPU
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25469 Sergey Belyashov changed: What|Removed |Added Target||z80-unknown-* CC||nickc at redhat dot com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/25469] [Z80][PATCH] Add support for GameBoy Z80 CPU
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25469 Sergey Belyashov changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #12232|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Comment #1 from Sergey Belyashov --- Created attachment 12236 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12236&action=edit Complete GBZ80 support, gcsections, DWARF Add define to enable gc-sections support (but linker warns, that --gc-sections option is ignored, I do not know why). Add support for DWARF (enables some tests, one of which (eh5) fails). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/25469] [Z80][PATCH] Add support for GameBoy Z80 CPU and .cfi directives
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25469 Sergey Belyashov changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[Z80][PATCH] Add support|[Z80][PATCH] Add support |for GameBoy Z80 CPU |for GameBoy Z80 CPU and ||.cfi directives -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/25469] [Z80][PATCH] Add support for GameBoy Z80 CPU and .cfi directives
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25469 Sergey Belyashov changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #12236|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Comment #2 from Sergey Belyashov --- Created attachment 12237 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12237&action=edit Add GBZ80 and Z80N support, gcsections, and DWARF Add support for Z80N (Z80 Next) CPU. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/25469] [Z80][PATCH] Add support for GameBoy Z80 CPU and .cfi directives
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25469 Sergey Belyashov changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #12237|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Comment #3 from Sergey Belyashov --- Created attachment 12238 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12238&action=edit Add support GBZ80 and Z80N Fix new relocation Add LD test for new relocation -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/25469] [Z80][PATCH] Add support for GameBoy Z80 CPU and .cfi directives
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25469 --- Comment #4 from Nick Clifton --- (In reply to Sergey Belyashov from comment #3) > Created attachment 12238 [details] > Add support GBZ80 and Z80N > > Fix new relocation > Add LD test for new relocation I am seeing new linker testsuite failures with this patch applied. :-( Checking Binutils in: z80-elf ... LD: 49 done LD REGRESSION: ld-elf/eh5 Checking Binutils in: z80-coff ... LD: 19 done LD REGRESSION: ld-misc/defsym1 LD REGRESSION: sysroot-prefix common plain -Lpath, quoted LD REGRESSION: sysroot-prefix common plain -Lpath, unquoted LD REGRESSION: sysroot-prefix common full-path, quoted LD REGRESSION: sysroot-prefix common full-path, unquoted LD REGRESSION: sysroot-prefix common plain =-prefixed with LD REGRESSION: sysroot-prefix common plain =-prefixed with LD REGRESSION: sysroot-prefix common plain $SYSROOT-prefixed with LD REGRESSION: sysroot-prefix common plain $SYSROOT-prefixed with LD REGRESSION: sysroot-prefix common plain =-prefixed -Lpath, LD REGRESSION: sysroot-prefix common plain =-prefixed -Lpath, LD REGRESSION: sysroot-prefix common plain $SYSROOT-prefixed -Lpath, LD REGRESSION: sysroot-prefix common plain $SYSROOT-prefixed -Lpath, LD REGRESSION: sysroot-prefix common full-path =-prefixed without, LD REGRESSION: sysroot-prefix common full-path =-prefixed without, LD REGRESSION: sysroot-prefix common full-path $SYSROOT-prefixed without, LD REGRESSION: sysroot-prefix common full-path $SYSROOT-prefixed without, LD REGRESSION: --entry foo archive LD REGRESSION: --entry foo -u foo archive Could you investigate these please and fix/waive as appropriate. Cheers Nick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/25469] [Z80][PATCH] Add support for GameBoy Z80 CPU and .cfi directives
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25469 Sergey Belyashov changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #12238|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Comment #5 from Sergey Belyashov --- Created attachment 12242 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12242&action=edit Add support GBZ80 and Z80N Fix COFF linker test failures I have no idea how to fix ld-elf/eh5 test failure. It is new test which was enabled when I enable DWARF generation for Z80 target. There is part of log: regexp "^0+01(58|70) 0+0014 0+01(5c|74) FDE cie=0+ pc=.*$" line "0158 0010 CIE" regexp "^ DW_CFA_advance_loc: 4 to .*$" line " Version: 1" regexp "^ DW_CFA_def_cfa: r0(.*) ofs 16$" line " Augmentation: "zR"" regexp "^ DW_CFA_nop$" line " Code alignment factor: 1" regexp "^ DW_CFA_nop$" line " Data alignment factor: -1" regexp "^ DW_CFA_nop$" line " Return address column: 7" regexp "^0+01(70|88) 0+0014 0+0(01c|148|15c) FDE cie=0+0(02c|030|170) pc=.*$" line " Augmentation data: 0b" regexp "^ DW_CFA_advance_loc: 4 to .*$" line " DW_CFA_nop" regexp "^ DW_CFA_def_cfa: r0(.*) ofs 16$" line " DW_CFA_nop" ... I have no expirience in DWARF. Can somebody helps me? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/25469] [Z80][PATCH] Add support for GameBoy Z80 CPU and .cfi directives
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25469 Sergey Belyashov changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #12242|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Comment #6 from Sergey Belyashov --- Created attachment 12249 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12249&action=edit Add support GBZ80, Z80N CPUs and DWARF Fix one test (used label name `a', which is Z80 register name) eh5 test is still failed (it is new test, which is enabled after enabling of DWARF). I think, problem is another place. For example, elf/discard tests fails due to silence of linker (test expects warning). Linker silently succeed due to discarding of symbol which should go to discard section. I think, same bug causes failure of PR 10549 (GNU OS ABI on STB_GNU_UNIQUE). I completely do not understand what happens there. Moreover, there are two assertion fails in four places of testsuit: ./ld-new: BFD (GNU Binutils) 2.34.50.20200127 assertion fail ../../bfd/elf.c:3550 ./ld-new: BFD (GNU Binutils) 2.34.50.20200127 assertion fail ../../bfd/elf.c:3655 This change patch no regressions (at least, detectible by tests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
