[Bug gas/30336] The GNU Assembler has bugs in Intel syntax
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30336 Gabriel Ravier changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gabravier at gmail dot com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/30336] The GNU Assembler has bugs in Intel syntax
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30336 --- Comment #5 from LIU Hao --- There is apparently confusion about using register names, instruction names or other keywords as labels. People who write Intel assembly shall know that those are 'bad' names for labels. That is to say, expecting GAS to parse `rsp` as a label is impractical. Rather, GAS should have rejected that `rsp:` thing. Something such as 'error: `rsp` cannot be used as a label name` is more clear, more precise, and safer, than silently producing unexpected code. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/30336] The GNU Assembler has bugs in Intel syntax
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30336 --- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Soomin Kim from comment #3) > I see. The first bug seems to be a duplicate of bug 12240. How about the > second one? Bug 12240 may not cover the second bug. I think it is a feature. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/30336] The GNU Assembler has bugs in Intel syntax
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30336 --- Comment #3 from Soomin Kim --- I see. The first bug seems to be a duplicate of bug 12240. How about the second one? Bug 12240 may not cover the second bug. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/30336] The GNU Assembler has bugs in Intel syntax
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30336 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu --- Dup. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 12240 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/30336] The GNU Assembler has bugs in Intel syntax
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30336 LIU Hao changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lh_mouse at 126 dot com --- Comment #1 from LIU Hao --- Also this: ``` E:\lh_mouse\Desktop>as --version GNU assembler (GNU Binutils) 2.40 Copyright (C) 2023 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This program is free software; you may redistribute it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 3 or later. This program has absolutely no warranty. This assembler was configured for a target of `x86_64-w64-mingw32'. E:\lh_mouse\Desktop>cat test.s .intel_syntax noprefix mov eax, dword ptr shr[rip] E:\lh_mouse\Desktop>as test.s test.s: Assembler messages: test.s:2: Error: invalid use of operator "shr" ``` GCC generates `mov eax, dword ptr shr[rip]` and Clang generates `mov eax, dword ptr [rip + shr]`, but AS accepts neither. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/30336] The GNU Assembler has bugs in Intel syntax
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30336 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
