[Bug gold/12945] gold linker breaks elfutils testuite (section '.rela.plt' has wrong flags: expected none and possibly ALLOC, is ALLOC|INFO_LINK).
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12945 --- Comment #8 from Mark Wielaard 2012-05-06 09:52:18 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) > btw, the current elfutils (0.153) with these fixes reports an error: > section [18] '.init_array': alloc flag set but section not in any loaded > segment I think that is fixed in git with the second commit mentioned in comment #5. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gold/12945] gold linker breaks elfutils testuite (section '.rela.plt' has wrong flags: expected none and possibly ALLOC, is ALLOC|INFO_LINK).
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12945 --- Comment #7 from Pawel Sikora 2012-05-06 09:15:22 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > Just FYI, both these issues have been resolved in elfutils git recently: > > commit 738c18312e0db36dce5e1cd2cddaf66eb8947f1a > Author: Roland McGrath > Date: Wed Mar 28 15:01:49 2012 -0700 > > elflint: Accept SHF_INFO_LINK for reloc sections. > > commit 191d1f0b9163593eee8c4f5cbe3e95cabf6ae9a9 > Author: Mark Wielaard > Date: Mon Apr 2 17:11:25 2012 +0200 > > elf32_offscn.c: Do not match SHT_NOBITS sections at OFFSET. > > readelf -d doesn't work if a SHT_NOBITS section is right before the actual > .dynamic section at the same offset. elflint also fails on such binaries. > So skip SHT_NOBITS sections at the same offset in [g]elf[32|64]_offscn(). btw, the current elfutils (0.153) with these fixes reports an error: section [18] '.init_array': alloc flag set but section not in any loaded segment -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gold/12945] gold linker breaks elfutils testuite (section '.rela.plt' has wrong flags: expected none and possibly ALLOC, is ALLOC|INFO_LINK).
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12945 --- Comment #6 from Ian Lance Taylor 2012-04-03 12:40:01 UTC --- Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gold/12945] gold linker breaks elfutils testuite (section '.rela.plt' has wrong flags: expected none and possibly ALLOC, is ALLOC|INFO_LINK).
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12945 Mark Wielaard changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mjw at redhat dot com --- Comment #5 from Mark Wielaard 2012-04-03 09:37:42 UTC --- Just FYI, both these issues have been resolved in elfutils git recently: commit 738c18312e0db36dce5e1cd2cddaf66eb8947f1a Author: Roland McGrath Date: Wed Mar 28 15:01:49 2012 -0700 elflint: Accept SHF_INFO_LINK for reloc sections. commit 191d1f0b9163593eee8c4f5cbe3e95cabf6ae9a9 Author: Mark Wielaard Date: Mon Apr 2 17:11:25 2012 +0200 elf32_offscn.c: Do not match SHT_NOBITS sections at OFFSET. readelf -d doesn't work if a SHT_NOBITS section is right before the actual .dynamic section at the same offset. elflint also fails on such binaries. So skip SHT_NOBITS sections at the same offset in [g]elf[32|64]_offscn(). -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gold/12945] gold linker breaks elfutils testuite (section '.rela.plt' has wrong flags: expected none and possibly ALLOC, is ALLOC|INFO_LINK).
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12945 Ian Lance Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution||INVALID --- Comment #4 from Ian Lance Taylor 2011-06-29 14:58:57 UTC --- Thanks for the test case. The elflint program is getting confused when it tries to find the .dynamic section. The PT_DYNAMIC segment is at address 0x32000. It happens that the .tbss section is at sddress 0x32000. Since the .tbss section is SHT_NOBITS, it does not take up any address space. The .dynamic section then follows it, also at address 0x32000. In the readelf -S output: [18] .tbss NOBITS 00032000 00032000 0008 WAT 0 0 4 [19] .dynamic DYNAMIC 00032000 00032000 0240 0010 WA 3 0 8 This is confusing elflint. It is using gelf_offscn to return the section at offset 0x32000. That winds up being the .tbss section, not the .dynamic section. Based on that it decides that there are no DT_NEEDED entries, and issues the .gnu.version_r warnings. I don't see any gold problem here. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gold/12945] gold linker breaks elfutils testuite (section '.rela.plt' has wrong flags: expected none and possibly ALLOC, is ALLOC|INFO_LINK).
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12945 --- Comment #3 from Pawel Sikora 2011-06-29 06:36:38 UTC --- Created attachment 5828 --> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=5828 binary for .gnu.version_r issue. section [ 8] '.gnu.version_r': entry 4 references unknown dependency section [ 8] '.gnu.version_r': entry 3 references unknown dependency section [ 8] '.gnu.version_r': entry 2 references unknown dependency section [ 8] '.gnu.version_r': entry 1 references unknown dependency section [ 8] '.gnu.version_r': entry 0 references unknown dependency section [10] '.rela.plt' has wrong flags: expected none and possibly ALLOC, is ALLOC|INFO_LINK *** failure in ../libdw/libdw.so -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gold/12945] gold linker breaks elfutils testuite (section '.rela.plt' has wrong flags: expected none and possibly ALLOC, is ALLOC|INFO_LINK).
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12945 Ian Lance Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #2 from Ian Lance Taylor 2011-06-28 20:27:39 UTC --- I can't recreate the problem with .gnu.version_r. Can you attach a failing binary? -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gold/12945] gold linker breaks elfutils testuite (section '.rela.plt' has wrong flags: expected none and possibly ALLOC, is ALLOC|INFO_LINK).
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12945 --- Comment #1 from Ian Lance Taylor 2011-06-28 20:20:00 UTC --- The ELF ABI specifies that the sh_info field of .rela.plt should be the section index of the section to which the relocation applies. It also specifies that the SHF_INFO_LINK flag indicates that the sh_info field is a section index. So I think it is entirely correct for .rela.plt to have the SHF_INFO_LINK flag set, and I think that complaining about that is a bug in the elfutils testsuite. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
