[Bug ld/10749] Linker failed to build working ia64 kernel

2009-10-12 Thread amodra at bigpond dot net dot au

--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au  2009-10-12 
13:21 ---
Unfortunately the patch isn't correct.  We might map a unique section to an
output section that later has some other section or data mapped.

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10749

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug ld/10749] Linker failed to build working ia64 kernel

2009-10-11 Thread dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca

--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca  
2009-10-11 19:24 ---
Subject: Re:  Linker failed to build working ia64 kernel

On Sun, 11 Oct 2009, amodra at bigpond dot net dot au wrote:

> Created an attachment (id=4265)
 --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4265&action=view)
>  --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4265&action=view)
> ld --unique tweak

Works for me.



-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10749

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug ld/10749] Linker failed to build working ia64 kernel

2009-10-10 Thread amodra at bigpond dot net dot au

--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au  2009-10-11 
02:26 ---
Sorry, I shouldn't have said .text is treated as an orphan.  That isn't quite
correct.  .text obviously isn't an orphan since .text is mentioned in the linker
script, so we don't hit the /DISCARD/.  .text is treated *like* an orphan.

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10749

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug ld/10749] Linker failed to build working ia64 kernel

2009-10-10 Thread amodra at bigpond dot net dot au

--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au  2009-10-11 
02:05 ---
Created an attachment (id=4265)
 --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4265&action=view)
ld --unique tweak

It might be reasonable to change the behaviour of unique sections so that the
script can match one input section.  This fixes the testcase and doesn't do too
much violence to the meaning of ld --unique.

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10749

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug ld/10749] Linker failed to build working ia64 kernel

2009-10-10 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com

--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com  2009-10-11 
02:03 ---
(In reply to comment #17)
> Exactly.  The reason is that .text is made a unique section, so doesn't match
> the .text in the script.  See unique_section_p, in particular the one in
> output_section_callback.  So .text is treated as an orphan, and orphans have
> their vma set to zero.

Linker script has

---
SECTIONS
{
  . = 0x80;
  .text : { *(.text) }
  . = 0x90;
  .data : { *(.data) }
  /DISCARD/ : { *(.*) }
}
---

Shouldn't the orphaned sections be discarded?


-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10749

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug ld/10749] Linker failed to build working ia64 kernel

2009-10-10 Thread amodra at bigpond dot net dot au

--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au  2009-10-11 
01:55 ---
Exactly.  The reason is that .text is made a unique section, so doesn't match
the .text in the script.  See unique_section_p, in particular the one in
output_section_callback.  So .text is treated as an orphan, and orphans have
their vma set to zero.

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10749

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug ld/10749] Linker failed to build working ia64 kernel

2009-10-10 Thread dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca

--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca  
2009-10-10 23:50 ---
Subject: Re:  Linker failed to build working ia64 kernel

> I guess the hppa test failure is due to hppaelf_after_parse
>   if (link_info.relocatable)
> lang_add_unique (".text");
> 
> I'd be inclined just to xfail the test for hppa.

I see the following section headers:

d...@mx3210:~/gnu/binutils/objdir/ld$ readelf -S --wide tmpdir/dump|less
There are 6 section headers, starting at offset 0x64:
Section Headers:
  [Nr] Name  TypeAddr OffSize   ES Flg Lk Inf Al
  [ 0]   NULL 00 00 00  0   0  0
  [ 1] .text PROGBITS 34 04 00  AX  0   0  1
  [ 2] .data PROGBITS0090 38 04 00  WA  0   0  1
  [ 3] .shstrtab STRTAB   3c 27 00  0   0  1
  [ 4] .symtab   SYMTAB   000154 30 10  5   3  4
  [ 5] .strtab   STRTAB   000184 01 00  0   0  1

The match seems to have failed because of the Addr value.

Dave


-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10749

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug ld/10749] Linker failed to build working ia64 kernel

2009-10-10 Thread amodra at bigpond dot net dot au

--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au  2009-10-10 
23:12 ---
I guess the hppa test failure is due to hppaelf_after_parse
  if (link_info.relocatable)
lang_add_unique (".text");

I'd be inclined just to xfail the test for hppa.

-- 
   What|Removed |Added

 CC||danglin at gcc dot gnu dot
   ||org


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10749

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug ld/10749] Linker failed to build working ia64 kernel

2009-10-10 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com

--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com  2009-10-10 
16:31 ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> On hppa-unknown-linux-gnu:
> 
> Executing on host: sh -c 
> {/home/dave/gnu/binutils/objdir/ld/../binutils/readelf 
>  -S --wide tmpdir/dump > tmpdir/dump.out 2>ld.tmp}  /dev/null  (timeout = 300)
> extra regexps in 
> /home/dave/gnu/binutils/src/ld/testsuite/ld-elf/relocatable.d s
> tarting with "^  \[[ 0-9]+\] \.text.*[ \t]+PROGBITS[ \t]+0+80[ 
> \t0-9a-f]+AX.
> *$"
> EOF from tmpdir/dump.out
> FAIL: relocatable with script
> 

It looks like a linker bug:

  [ 1] .text PROGBITS 34 04 00  AX  0   0  1
  [ 2] .data PROGBITS0090 38 04 00  WA  0   0  1

The address of .text is wrong. I think you should open a separate
bug.

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10749

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug ld/10749] Linker failed to build working ia64 kernel

2009-10-10 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org

--- Additional Comments From danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-10-10 
16:13 ---
On hppa-unknown-linux-gnu:

Executing on host: sh -c {/home/dave/gnu/binutils/objdir/ld/../binutils/readelf 
 -S --wide tmpdir/dump > tmpdir/dump.out 2>ld.tmp}  /dev/null  (timeout = 300)
extra regexps in /home/dave/gnu/binutils/src/ld/testsuite/ld-elf/relocatable.d s
tarting with "^  \[[ 0-9]+\] \.text.*[ \t]+PROGBITS[ \t]+0+80[ \t0-9a-f]+AX.
*$"
EOF from tmpdir/dump.out
FAIL: relocatable with script


-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10749

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug ld/10749] Linker failed to build working ia64 kernel

2009-10-09 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com

--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com  2009-10-09 
15:41 ---
Fixed.

-- 
   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10749

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug ld/10749] Linker failed to build working ia64 kernel

2009-10-09 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-10-09 
13:33 ---
Subject: Bug 10749

CVSROOT:/cvs/src
Module name:src
Changes by: h...@sourceware.org 2009-10-09 13:32:50

Modified files:
ld/testsuite   : ChangeLog 
Added files:
ld/testsuite/ld-elf: relocatable.d relocatable.t simple.s 

Log message:
2009-10-09  H.J. Lu  

PR ld/10749
* ld-elf/relocatable.d: New.
* ld-elf/relocatable.t: Likewise.
* ld-elf/simple.s: Likewise.

Patches:
http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/ld/testsuite/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=src&r1=1.1180&r2=1.1181
http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/ld/testsuite/ld-elf/relocatable.d.diff?cvsroot=src&r1=NONE&r2=1.1
http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/ld/testsuite/ld-elf/relocatable.t.diff?cvsroot=src&r1=NONE&r2=1.1
http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/ld/testsuite/ld-elf/simple.s.diff?cvsroot=src&r1=NONE&r2=1.1



-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10749

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug ld/10749] Linker failed to build working ia64 kernel

2009-10-08 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-10-09 
05:43 ---
Subject: Bug 10749

CVSROOT:/cvs/src
Module name:src
Branch: binutils-2_20-branch
Changes by: amo...@sourceware.org   2009-10-09 05:43:07

Modified files:
ld : ChangeLog ldlang.c 
ld/scripttempl : aix.sc armbpabi.sc avr.sc elf.sc elf32cr16.sc 
 elf32cr16c.sc elf32crx.sc elf32msp430.sc 
 elf32msp430_3.sc elf32sh-symbian.sc 
 elf64hppa.sc elf_chaos.sc elfd10v.sc elfd30v.sc 
 elfi370.sc elfm68hc11.sc elfm68hc12.sc 
 elfmicroblaze.sc elfxtensa.sc iq2000.sc mep.sc 
 nw.sc psos.sc tic54xcoff.sc xstormy16.sc 

Log message:
PR ld/10749
* ldlang.c (lang_size_sections_1): Zero section vmas only for COFF.
* scripttempl/elf32cr16.sc: Revert 2009-09-28 change.
* scripttempl/elf32cr16c.sc: Likewise.
* scripttempl/elf32crx.sc: Likewise.
* scripttempl/tic54xcoff.sc: Likewise.
* scripttempl/aix.sc: Likewise.
* scripttempl/avr.sc: Likewise.
* scripttempl/elf32msp430.sc: Likewise.
* scripttempl/elf32msp430_3.sc: Likewise.
* scripttempl/elf32sh-symbian.sc: Likewise.
* scripttempl/elf_chaos.sc: Likewise.
* scripttempl/elfi370.sc: Likewise.
* scripttempl/nw.sc: Likewise.
* scripttempl/psos.sc: Likewise.
* scripttempl/armbpabi.sc: Likewise.
* scripttempl/elf.sc: Likewise.
* scripttempl/elf64hppa.sc: Likewise.
* scripttempl/elfd10v.sc: Likewise.
* scripttempl/elfd30v.sc: Likewise.
* scripttempl/elfm68hc11.sc: Likewise.
* scripttempl/elfm68hc12.sc: Likewise.
* scripttempl/elfmicroblaze.sc: Likewise.
* scripttempl/elfxtensa.sc: Likewise.
* scripttempl/iq2000.sc: Likewise.
* scripttempl/mep.sc: Likewise.
* scripttempl/xstormy16.sc: Likewise.

2009-10-03  Alan Modra  

* emultempl/ppc32elf.em (emit_stub_syms): Init to -1.
(ppc_after_open): Set emit_stubs_syms by default when shared.
(OPTION_NO_STUBSYMS): Define.
(PARSE_AND_LIST_LONGOPTS, PARSE_AND_LIST_OPTIONS,
PARSE_AND_LIST_ARGS_CASES): Handle --no-emit-stub-syms.
* emultempl/ppc64elf.em (emit_stub_syms): Init to -1.
(gld${EMULATION_NAME}_finish): Set emit_stubs_syms by default.
(OPTION_NO_STUBSYMS): Define.
(PARSE_AND_LIST_LONGOPTS, PARSE_AND_LIST_OPTIONS,
PARSE_AND_LIST_ARGS_CASES): Handle --no-emit-stub-syms.

2009-09-30  Matthias Klose  

PR ld/9863
* emulparams/armelf_linux.sh (DATA_START_SYMBOLS): Use PROVIDE
with __data_start.

2009-09-29  Joel Sherrill 

* emulparams/m68kelf.sh (NOP): Use 0x4e71 (nop) rather than 0x4e75
(rts).

2009-09-29  Alan Modra  

* ldlang.c (lang_size_sections_1): Allow scripts to specify a
non-zero vma even when relocatable.

2009-09-28  Alan Modra  

* scripttempl/elf32cr16.sc: Emit empty script for ld -r and ld -Ur.
* scripttempl/elf32cr16c.sc: Likewise.
* scripttempl/elf32crx.sc: Likewise.
* scripttempl/tic54xcoff.sc: Likewise.
* scripttempl/aix.sc: Delete ${RELOCATING-0}.
* scripttempl/avr.sc: Likewise.
* scripttempl/elf32msp430.sc: Likewise.
* scripttempl/elf32msp430_3.sc: Likewise.
* scripttempl/elf32sh-symbian.sc: Likewise.
* scripttempl/elf_chaos.sc: Likewise.
* scripttempl/elfi370.sc: Likewise.
* scripttempl/nw.sc: Likewise.
* scripttempl/psos.sc: Likewise.
* scripttempl/armbpabi.sc: Delete ${RELOCATING-0} and ${CONSTRUCTING-0}.
* scripttempl/elf.sc: Likewise.
* scripttempl/elf64hppa.sc: Likewise.
* scripttempl/elfd10v.sc: Likewise.
* scripttempl/elfd30v.sc: Likewise.
* scripttempl/elfm68hc11.sc: Likewise.
* scripttempl/elfm68hc12.sc: Likewise.
* scripttempl/elfmicroblaze.sc: Likewise.
* scripttempl/elfxtensa.sc: Likewise.
* scripttempl/iq2000.sc: Likewise.
* scripttempl/mep.sc: Likewise.
* scripttempl/xstormy16.sc: Likewise.

Patches:
http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/ld/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=src&only_with_tag=binutils-2_20-branch&r1=1.2039.2.12&r2=1.2039.2.13
http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/ld/ldlang.c.diff?cvsroot=src&only_with_tag=binutils-2_20-branch&r1=1.317.2.2&r2=1.317.2.3
http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/ld/scripttempl/aix.sc.diff?cvsroot=src&only_with_tag=binutils-2_20-branch&r1=1.4.28.2&r2=1.4.28.3
http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/ld/scripttempl/armbpabi.sc.diff?cvsroot=src&only_with_tag=binutils-2_20-branch&r1=1.16.2.1&r

[Bug ld/10749] Linker failed to build working ia64 kernel

2009-10-08 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-10-09 
05:19 ---
Subject: Bug 10749

CVSROOT:/cvs/src
Module name:src
Changes by: amo...@sourceware.org   2009-10-09 05:19:37

Modified files:
ld : ChangeLog ldlang.c 

Log message:
PR ld/10749
* ldlang.c (lang_size_sections_1): Zero section vmas only for COFF.

Patches:
http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/ld/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=src&r1=1.2060&r2=1.2061
http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/ld/ldlang.c.diff?cvsroot=src&r1=1.322&r2=1.323



-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10749

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug ld/10749] Linker failed to build working ia64 kernel

2009-10-08 Thread amodra at bigpond dot net dot au


-- 
   What|Removed |Added

 AssignedTo|unassigned at sources dot   |amodra at bigpond dot net
   |redhat dot com  |dot au
 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2009-10-09 04:15:55
   date||


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10749

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug ld/10749] Linker failed to build working ia64 kernel

2009-10-08 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com

--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com  2009-10-09 
04:09 ---
This patch

http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2009-09/msg00365.html

may be the cause.

-- 
   What|Removed |Added

 CC||cgf at sourceware dot org


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10749

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug ld/10749] Linker failed to build working ia64 kernel

2009-10-08 Thread amodra at bigpond dot net dot au

--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au  2009-10-09 
03:59 ---
kernel/Makefile.gate has GATECFLAGS_gate-syms.o = -r, and gate-syms.o is built
with a custom linker script.  So, yes, the ld -r change is responsible for
breaking the ia64 kernel.

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10749

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug ld/10749] Linker failed to build working ia64 kernel

2009-10-08 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com

--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com  2009-10-09 
03:57 ---
Please get

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4260&action=view

and do

[...@gnu-14 kernel]$ ld -r -o gate-syms.o -T gate.lds  gate.o

20090929 linker generates bad gate-syms.o.

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10749

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug ld/10749] Linker failed to build working ia64 kernel

2009-10-08 Thread amodra at bigpond dot net dot au

--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au  2009-10-09 
03:23 ---
readelf -a shows symbol differences which I guess are real problems.

--- dump.good   2009-10-09 13:50:23.0 +1030
+++ dump.bad2009-10-09 13:50:09.0 +1030
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@
   [16] .opd  PROGBITSa00100678a30 688a30 017160 00   A
 0   0 16
   [17] .init.textPROGBITSa0010069 6a 0429f0 00  AX
 0   0 32
   [18] .init.dataPROGBITSa001006d29f0 6e29f0 01c460 00  WA
 0   0  8
-  [19] .init.ramfs   PROGBITSa001006eee50 6fee50 86 00   A
 0   0  1
+  [19] .init.ramfs   PROGBITSa001006eee50 6fee50 85 00   A
 0   0  1
   [20] .init.setup   PROGBITSa0010060 6feee0 000840 00  WA
 0   0  8
   [21] .initcall.initPROGBITSa001006ef720 6ff720 000548 00  WA
 0   0  8
   [22] .con_initcall.init PROGBITSa001006efc68 6ffc68 18 00  WA
 0   0  8
@@ -125923,7 +125923,7 @@
  16927: a0010016db00   496 FUNCGLOBAL DEFAULT1 inode_init_once
  16928: a001002e5420   208 FUNCGLOBAL DEFAULT1 acpi_ut_execute_STA
  16929: a001007e4c48 8 OBJECT  GLOBAL DEFAULT   31 sighand_cachep
- 16930: a50c 0 NOTYPE  GLOBAL DEFAULT  ABS
__end_gate_brl_fsys_bubble_down_patchlist
+ 16930: 000c 0 NOTYPE  GLOBAL DEFAULT  ABS
__end_gate_brl_fsys_bubble_down_patchlist
  16931: 2f262839 0 NOTYPE  GLOBAL DEFAULT  ABS
__crc___module_put_and_exit
  16932: a001002dc440   192 FUNCGLOBAL DEFAULT1
acpi_rs_get_crs_method_data
  16933: a001002bb9e0  1104 FUNCGLOBAL DEFAULT1
acpi_ex_resolve_object_to_value
@@ -126711,7 +126711,7 @@
  17715: 3717dbf9 0 NOTYPE  GLOBAL DEFAULT  ABS __crc_ia64_pfn_valid
  17716: a001001a4500  2496 FUNCGLOBAL DEFAULT1 vfs_quota_off
  17717: a0010027026080 FUNCGLOBAL DEFAULT1 pci_do_scan_bus
- 17718: a0010640   192 FUNCGLOBAL DEFAULT  ABS 
__kernel_syscall_via_epc
+ 17718: 0020   192 FUNCGLOBAL DEFAULT  ABS 
__kernel_syscall_via_epc
  17719: a001003d20a0   384 FUNCGLOBAL DEFAULT1 ata_output_data
  17720: faf1daa7 0 NOTYPE  GLOBAL DEFAULT  ABS
__crc_pci_find_device_reverse
  17721: a00100253400   336 FUNCGLOBAL DEFAULT1 __bitmap_subset
[snip]


-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10749

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug ld/10749] Linker failed to build working ia64 kernel

2009-10-08 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com

--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com  2009-10-09 
03:08 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Do you have a good and a bad kernel image for me to look at?

Please get

ftp://ftp.intel.com/pub/incoming/ia64.tar.bz2

It will disappear in a few hours.  Thanks.

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10749

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug ld/10749] Linker failed to build working ia64 kernel

2009-10-08 Thread amodra at bigpond dot net dot au

--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au  2009-10-09 
01:28 ---
Do you have a good and a bad kernel image for me to look at?

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10749

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug ld/10749] Linker failed to build working ia64 kernel

2009-10-08 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com

--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com  2009-10-08 
22:33 ---
20090923 linker is OK and 20090929 linker is bad. Alan, I think
your "ld -r" patch may be the cause.


-- 
   What|Removed |Added

 CC||amodra at bigpond dot net
   ||dot au
Summary|Failed to build working ia64|Linker failed to build
   |kernel  |working ia64 kernel


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10749

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils