[Bug ld/17369] The PF_X bit is set on PT_PHDR segment
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17369 Steven Stewart-Gallus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sstewartgallus00@mylangara. ||bc.ca --- Comment #3 from Steven Stewart-Gallus --- If I pass --rosegment to gold this fixes this. Do you want a --rosegment feature added to ld? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/17369] The PF_X bit is set on PT_PHDR segment
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17369 --- Comment #4 from Nick Clifton --- Hi Steven, > If I pass --rosegment to gold this fixes this. Do you want a --rosegment > feature added to ld? No - if this strangeness is not actually causing any problems then I do not see any reason to fix it. Adding a new option adds the possibility of new bugs, something that I would rather avoid unless it provides a real benefit. Cheers Nick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/17369] The PF_X bit is set on PT_PHDR segment
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17369 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment #1 from Nick Clifton --- Hi H.J. Apparently this is for compatibility with UnixWare and Solaris. See bfd/elf.c:3849: /* FIXME: UnixWare and Solaris set PF_X, Irix 5 does not. */ m->p_flags = PF_R | PF_X; Is the execute bit causing you problems ? The ELF standard does not forbid it, so unless there is an actual issue that needs fixing I do not see any reason to change the current behaviour. Cheers Nick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/17369] The PF_X bit is set on PT_PHDR segment
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17369 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu --- It just looks odd. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/17369] The PF_X bit is set on PT_PHDR segment
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17369 Fangrui Song changed: What|Removed |Added CC||maskray at google dot com --- Comment #5 from Fangrui Song --- This was fixed by commit f882209d9aa5b68d68c45c5849e129ffc228749c -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/17369] The PF_X bit is set on PT_PHDR segment
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17369 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #6 from Nick Clifton --- Closing... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
