[Bug ld/22727] [2.30, 2.31 regression] Thousands of EH-related execution failures on Solaris/SPARC
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22727 --- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #6) > > Does Linux/Sparc work? Are there any regressions in binutils > > testsuite on Solaris/Sparc? > > The EH failures are also present on SPARC64/Linux with GCC 7.3RC1 and > binutils 2.30, whereas they are _not_ present with GCC 7.3RC1 and binutils > 2.29.1. This implies that ld testsuite coverage in binutils for Sparc is very poor. Can you extract some ld tesctcases from GCC tests? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/22727] [2.30, 2.31 regression] Thousands of EH-related execution failures on Solaris/SPARC
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22727 --- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou --- > Does Linux/Sparc work? Are there any regressions in binutils > testsuite on Solaris/Sparc? The EH failures are also present on SPARC64/Linux with GCC 7.3RC1 and binutils 2.30, whereas they are _not_ present with GCC 7.3RC1 and binutils 2.29.1. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/22727] [2.30, 2.31 regression] Thousands of EH-related execution failures on Solaris/SPARC
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22727 --- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou --- > Does Linux/Sparc work? Are there any regressions in binutils > testsuite on Solaris/Sparc? On SPARC64/Linux: binutils & gas testsuite clean, ld testsuite as follows: === ld Summary === # of expected passes1227 # of unexpected failures7 # of expected failures 26 # of untested testcases 1 # of unsupported tests 21 FAIL: ld-elf/pr22450 FAIL: Build pr22269-1 FAIL: Run pr22393-2 FAIL: Run pr22393-2 (PIE) FAIL: Build pr22263-1 *** Error in `/home/ebotcazou/binutils-2.30.0/ld/tmpdir/ld/collect-ld': corrupted size vs. prev_size: 0x012b2c30 *** *** Error in `/home/ebotcazou/binutils-2.30.0/ld/tmpdir/ld/collect-ld': corrupted size vs. prev_size: 0x012b2c30 *** FAIL: visibility (hidden_normal) (PIC main) *** Error in `/home/ebotcazou/binutils-2.30.0/ld/tmpdir/ld/collect-ld': corrupted size vs. prev_size: 0x012b2c30 *** *** Error in `/home/ebotcazou/binutils-2.30.0/ld/tmpdir/ld/collect-ld': corrupted size vs. prev_size: 0x012b2c30 *** FAIL: visibility (hidden_weak) (PIC main) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/22727] [2.30, 2.31 regression] Thousands of EH-related execution failures on Solaris/SPARC
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22727 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou --- > > Does Linux/Sparc work? Are there any regressions in binutils > > I've no idea and no way to test. I'm going to test on SPARC64/Linux. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/22727] [2.30, 2.31 regression] Thousands of EH-related execution failures on Solaris/SPARC
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22727 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu --- This could be a dup of PR 22721. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/22727] [2.30, 2.31 regression] Thousands of EH-related execution failures on Solaris/SPARC
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22727 --- Comment #2 from Rainer Orth --- > --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu --- > Does Linux/Sparc work? Are there any regressions in binutils I've no idea and no way to test. > testsuite on Solaris/Sparc? That will take a bit to determine: I'll need to rebuild gcc to use the freshly-built gas and gld, otherwise testing is meaningless (often the configured as and ld are used, not the binutils ones). Rainer -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/22727] [2.30, 2.31 regression] Thousands of EH-related execution failures on Solaris/SPARC
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22727 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING CC||davem at davemloft dot net --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu --- Does Linux/Sparc work? Are there any regressions in binutils testsuite on Solaris/Sparc? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
