[Bug ld/22845] -z separate-code doesn't work right
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22845 Jeremi changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jeremip11 at gmail dot com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/22845] -z separate-code doesn't work right
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22845 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|--- |2.31 --- Comment #11 from H.J. Lu --- Fixed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/22845] -z separate-code doesn't work right
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22845 --- Comment #10 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=f61f94ec1bf9cb3d32b38a90a1f5c2d58ececbfb commit f61f94ec1bf9cb3d32b38a90a1f5c2d58ececbfb Author: H.J. Lu Date: Mon Feb 19 05:07:33 2018 -0800 ld: Add -z separate-code tests to frame.exp On x86, "-z separate-code" leads to assertion fail at bfd/elf.c:5917. Alsp skip tests if -shared isn't supported. PR ld/22845 * testsuite/ld-elf/frame.exp: Skip if -shared isn't supported. Add tests for "-z noseparate-code" and "-z separate-code". Remove unsupported -shared check. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/22845] -z separate-code doesn't work right
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22845 --- Comment #9 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=dbc88fc14992c556b94e77de563a8f7abcb0b653 commit dbc88fc14992c556b94e77de563a8f7abcb0b653 Author: Alan Modra Date: Mon Feb 19 09:52:53 2018 +1030 PT_LOAD and PT_GNU_RELRO segment overlap Commit 325ba6fb34 excluded degenerate zero length PT_LOAD segments, but that only fixed part of the problem, which was that the load segment limits were not calculated properly. PR 22845 * elf.c (IS_TBSS): Define. (_bfd_elf_map_sections_to_segments): Use IS_TBSS. (assign_file_positions_for_non_load_sections): Revert last change. Properly calculate load segment limits to compare against relro limits. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/22845] -z separate-code doesn't work right
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22845 --- Comment #8 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=d85502cffa5e41db6f2f2e1ba11d4285918dccdb commit d85502cffa5e41db6f2f2e1ba11d4285918dccdb Author: H.J. Lu Date: Sat Feb 17 14:54:16 2018 -0800 ld-elf/ehdr_start: Pass --build-id to ld ld-elf/ehdr_start fails with -z separate-code. Since there is no data LOAD segment before code LOAD segment: There are 2 program headers, starting at offset 64 Program Headers: Type Offset VirtAddr PhysAddr FileSiz MemSiz Flg Align LOAD 0x20 0x0060 0x0060 0x10 0x10 R E 0x20 LOAD 0x40 0x0080 0x0080 0x08 0x08 R 0x20 Section to Segment mapping: Segment Sections... 00 .text 01 .rodata the program header isn't included in any LOAD segment. As the result, reference to __ehdr_start is resolved to zero. Pass --build-id to ld to add a data LOAD segment before code LOAD segment to put the program header in the data LOAD segment. PR ld/22845 * testsuite/ld-elf/ehdr_start.d: Pass --build-id to ld. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/22845] -z separate-code doesn't work right
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22845 --- Comment #7 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=34b00afa0396871f762190b8c436d2a5bf91c9e1 commit 34b00afa0396871f762190b8c436d2a5bf91c9e1 Author: H.J. Lu Date: Sat Feb 17 05:37:37 2018 -0800 ld: Add -z separate-code test for zero size section PR ld/22845 * testsuite/ld-elf/binutils.exp (tls_opts): Add tests for "-z noseparate-code" and "-z separate-code". -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/22845] -z separate-code doesn't work right
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22845 --- Comment #6 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=92d9e363b5ab7f96a2c8e6d3ae86cf8cc91dca9d commit 92d9e363b5ab7f96a2c8e6d3ae86cf8cc91dca9d Author: H.J. Lu Date: Sat Feb 17 05:30:13 2018 -0800 ld-elf/eh4: Pass -z max-page-size=0x20 -z noseparate-code to ld -z separate-code creates separate code LOAD segment, aligns it to the maximum page size and places .plt section before .text section. But ld-elf/eh4 passes -Ttext 0x400 to linker to place .text section at address 0x400, which is impossible for linker to accomplish: $ ld -shared -Ttext 0x400 -z separate-code -o x.so eh4.o ld: section .eh_frame LMA [0020,0020006b] overlaps section .plt LMA [0020,0020001f] Since ld-elf/eh4 also checks exact addresses, this patch passes -z max-page-size=0x20 -z noseparate-code to ld. PR ld/22845 * ld-elf/eh4.d: Pass -z max-page-size=0x20 -z noseparate-code to ld. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/22845] -z separate-code doesn't work right
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22845 --- Comment #5 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=325ba6fb34be799c885fad9287d883e86b835c84 commit 325ba6fb34be799c885fad9287d883e86b835c84 Author: Alan Modra Date: Sat Feb 17 09:21:17 2018 +1030 Ignore degenerate PT_LOAD segments Fixes a failure triggered by -z separate-code. p_memsz is tested rather than p_filesz for objcopy --only-keep-debug where p_filesz is set to zero. PR 22845 * elf.c (assign_file_positions_for_non_load_sections): Ignore degenerate zero size PT_LOAD segments when finding one overlapping the PT_GNU_RELRO segment. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/22845] -z separate-code doesn't work right
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22845 --- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu --- FAIL: ld-elf/eh4 [hjl@gnu-tools-1 ld]$ /export/build/gnu/binutils/build-x86_64-linux/ld/../gas/as-new --defsym ALIGN=3 --64 -o tmpdir/eh4.o /export/gnu/import/git/sources/binutils-gdb/ld/testsuite/ld-elf/eh4.s [hjl@gnu-tools-1 ld]$ /export/build/gnu/binutils/build-x86_64-linux/ld/../gas/as-new --defsym ALIGN=3 --64 -o tmpdir/eh4a.o /export/gnu/import/git/sources/binutils-gdb/ld/testsuite/ld-elf/eh4a.s [hjl@gnu-tools-1 ld]$ ld -z separate-code -z norelro -L/export/gnu/import/git/sources/binutils-gdb/ld/testsuite/ld-elf -melf_x86_64 -shared -Ttext 0x400 -o tmpdir/dump tmpdir/eh4.o tmpdir/eh4a.o ld: section .eh_frame LMA [0020,00200073] overlaps section .plt LMA [0020,0020001f] [hjl@gnu-tools-1 ld]$ -Ttext 0x400 doesn't work with -z separate-code. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/22845] -z separate-code doesn't work right
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22845 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu --- With this patch: https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2018-02/msg00212.html now I got FAIL: ld-elf/ehdr_start-shared FAIL: ld-elf/ehdr_start FAIL: ld-elf/loadaddr1 FAIL: ld-elf/loadaddr2 FAIL: ld-elf/mbind1b FAIL: ld-elf/mbind1c FAIL: ld-elf/orphan-region FAIL: ld-elf/pie FAIL: ld-elf/pr19162 FAIL: ld-elf/pr22393-1c FAIL: ld-elf/pr22393-1d FAIL: ld-elf/pr22423 FAIL: ld-elf/textaddr1 FAIL: ld-elf/textaddr2 FAIL: ld-elf/textaddr4 FAIL: ld-elf/textaddr6 FAIL: PIE preinit array FAIL: PIE init array FAIL: PIE fini array FAIL: PIE init array mixed FAIL: PIE PR ld/14525 FAIL: Run mbind2b FAIL: static preinit array FAIL: static init array FAIL: static fini array FAIL: static init array mixed FAIL: Run indirect5 3 FAIL: Run indirect5 4 FAIL: Run indirect6 3 FAIL: Run indirect6 4 FAIL: indirect5c dynsym FAIL: indirect5d dynsym FAIL: indirect6c dynsym FAIL: indirect6d dynsym FAIL: Build pr22393-2 (PIE) FAIL: Run pr18458 with PIE FAIL: Run pr2404 with PIE FAIL: Run pr2404 with PIE (-z now) FAIL: Run pr18718 with PIE (1) FAIL: Run pr18718 with PIE (3) FAIL: Run pr18718 with PIC (2) FAIL: Run pr18718 with PIC (4) FAIL: Run pr19579 FAIL: Run pr19579 (-z now) FAIL: Run pr22393-2 (PIE) FAIL: Run pr22393-2 (static) FAIL: Run pr19719pie fun defined FAIL: Build pr22263-1 FAIL: TLS -fpic -shared transitions FAIL: TLS -fpic -shared transitions without PLT FAIL: TLS descriptor -fpic -shared transitions FAIL: TLS -fpic and -fno-pic exec transitions FAIL: TLS -fpic and -fno-pic exec transitions without PLT FAIL: TLS descriptor -fpic and -fno-pic exec transitions FAIL: TLS -fno-pic -shared FAIL: TLS with global dynamic and descriptors FAIL: Basic --emit-relocs support FAIL: Build pr19827 FAIL: ld-i386/protected5 FAIL: TLS with PIE FAIL: TLS with PIE FAIL: ld-i386/tlspie3a FAIL: ld-i386/tlspie3b FAIL: ld-i386/tlspie3c FAIL: ld-i386/nogot2 FAIL: ld-i386/lea1b FAIL: ld-i386/lea1e FAIL: ld-i386/mov2b FAIL: ld-i386/load1 FAIL: ld-i386/pr19615 FAIL: ld-i386/pr19636-1a FAIL: ld-i386/pr19636-1b FAIL: ld-i386/pr19636-1j FAIL: ld-i386/pr19636-1k FAIL: ld-i386/pr19636-2a FAIL: ld-i386/pr19636-2b FAIL: ld-i386/pr19636-2c FAIL: ld-i386/pr19636-3a FAIL: ld-i386/pr19636-3b FAIL: ld-i386/pr19636-3c FAIL: ld-i386/pr19636-3h FAIL: ld-i386/pr19636-3i FAIL: ld-i386/pr19636-4a FAIL: ld-i386/pr19636-4b FAIL: ld-i386/pr19609-2b FAIL: ld-i386/undefweakb FAIL: ld-i386/pr20244-1a FAIL: ld-i386/pr20244-1b FAIL: ld-i386/pr20244-1c FAIL: ld-i386/pr20244-2a FAIL: ld-i386/pr20244-2b FAIL: ld-i386/pr20244-2c FAIL: ld-i386/pr20244-2d FAIL: ld-i386/pr20244-4a FAIL: ld-i386/pr20244-4b FAIL: ld-i386/pr20244-4c FAIL: ld-i386/pr20253-4b FAIL: ld-i386/pie1 FAIL: ld-i386/pr22115-1a FAIL: ld-i386/pr22115-1b FAIL: ld-i386/pr22135 FAIL: PR ld/13302 FAIL: basic PLT generation (non-PIC, -z now) FAIL: PR ld/20830 (.plt.got) FAIL: ld-i386/ibt-plt-1 FAIL: ld-i386/ibt-plt-2a FAIL: ld-i386/ibt-plt-2b FAIL: ld-i386/ibt-plt-2c FAIL: ld-i386/ibt-plt-2d FAIL: ld-i386/ibt-plt-3a FAIL: ld-i386/ibt-plt-3b FAIL: ld-i386/ibt-plt-3c FAIL: ld-i386/ibt-plt-3d FAIL: Common symbol override ifunc test 1a FAIL: Common symbol override ifunc test 1b FAIL: ld-ifunc/ifunc-1-local-x86 FAIL: ld-ifunc/ifunc-1-x86 FAIL: ld-ifunc/ifunc-2-i386-now FAIL: ld-ifunc/ifunc-2-local-i386-now FAIL: ld-ifunc/ifunc-2-local-x86-64-now FAIL: ld-ifunc/ifunc-2-local-x86-64 FAIL: ld-ifunc/ifunc-2-x86-64-now FAIL: ld-ifunc/ifunc-2-x86-64 FAIL: ld-ifunc/ifunc-21-i386 FAIL: ld-ifunc/ifunc-21-x86-64 FAIL: ld-ifunc/ifunc-22-i386 FAIL: ld-ifunc/ifunc-22-x86-64 FAIL: ld-ifunc/ifunc-23b-x86 FAIL: ld-ifunc/ifunc-24b-x86 FAIL: ld-ifunc/ifunc-25b-x86 FAIL: ld-ifunc/ifunc-3a-x86 FAIL: ld-ifunc/pr17154-i386-now FAIL: ld-ifunc/pr17154-i386 FAIL: ld-ifunc/pr17154-x86-64-now FAIL: ld-ifunc/pr17154-x86-64 FAIL: Run ifunc-main with PIE (-z now) FAIL: weak undefined FAIL: weak undefined data FAIL: missing entry symbol FAIL: zero p_vaddr FAIL: weak undefined functions in pie, no dyn undef weak FAIL: weak undefined functions in pie, dyn undef weak FAIL: Build mpx4 FAIL: Build mpx3 (-z now) FAIL: Build mpx4 (-z now) FAIL: Run mpx1 with -static FAIL: Run mpx2 FAIL: Run mpx2 with -static FAIL: ld-x86-64/bnd-ifunc-1 FAIL: ld-x86-64/bnd-ifunc-2 FAIL: ld-x86-64/bnd-plt-1 FAIL: ld-x86-64/bnd-branch-1-now FAIL: ld-x86-64/bnd-ifunc-1-now FAIL: ld-x86-64/bnd-ifunc-2-now FAIL: ld-x86-64/bnd-plt-1-now FAIL: No PLT (PIE 1e) FAIL: No PLT (PIE 1f) FAIL: No PLT (PIE 1g) FAIL: No PLT (static 1d) FAIL: No PLT (PIE 1e) FAIL: No PLT (PIE 1f) FAIL: No PLT (PIE 1g) FAIL: Run pr20253-2b FAIL: Run pr20253-2c FAIL: Run pr20253-2e FAIL: Run pr20253-2g FAIL: TLS GD/LD -> LE transition without PLT (PIE) FAIL: TLS GD/LD -> LE transition without PLT (PIE, -z now) FAIL: TLS GD/LD -> LE transition without PLT (static) FAIL: Run tlsdesc1 with PIE FAIL: Run tlsdesc1 with PIE (-z now) FAIL: TLS -fpic -shared transitions FAIL: TLS -fpic -shared transitions with r15 as GOT base FAIL: TLS de
[Bug ld/22845] -z separate-code doesn't work right
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22845 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu --- Wrong linker script is used. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/22845] -z separate-code doesn't work right
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22845 --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu --- Static binary died at: Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. __libc_setup_tls () at libc-tls.c:122 122 if (phdr->p_type == PT_TLS) (gdb) p *phdr Cannot access memory at address 0x8047034 Program header isn't mapped in: Elf file type is EXEC (Executable file) Entry point 0x80487f2 There are 7 program headers, starting at offset 52 Program Headers: Type Offset VirtAddr PhysAddr FileSiz MemSiz Flg Align LOAD 0x001000 0x08048000 0x08048000 0x5de08 0x5de08 R E 0x1000 LOAD 0x05ee08 0x080a6e08 0x080a6e08 0x22f8b 0x22f8b R 0x1000 LOAD 0x082b80 0x080cbb80 0x080cbb80 0x013d4 0x01fbc RW 0x1000 NOTE 0x05ee08 0x080a6e08 0x080a6e08 0x00044 0x00044 R 0x4 TLS0x082b80 0x080cbb80 0x080cbb80 0x00010 0x00030 R 0x4 GNU_STACK 0x00 0x 0x 0x0 0x0 RW 0x10 GNU_RELRO 0x082b80 0x080cbb80 0x080cbb80 0x00480 0x00480 R 0x1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
