[Bug ld/2721] --as-needed vs. DT_NEEDED undef symbols checks
--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2006-06-05 13:19 --- Fixed mainline with http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils-cvs/2006-06/msg00018.html -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2721 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/2721] --as-needed vs. DT_NEEDED undef symbols checks
--- Additional Comments From jakub at redhat dot com 2006-06-01 13:40
---
Oops, actually, swap the order of libfoo.so and libbar.so on the last command
line and then it is a regression from older binutils (e.g. 2.16.91.0.6
20060212).
echo 'int foo1;' | gcc -shared -fpic -o /usr/lib/libfoo.so -xc - -xnone \
-Wl,-soname,libfoo.so
echo 'int foo1; int foo2;' | gcc -shared -fpic -o libfoo.so -xc - -xnone \
-Wl,-soname,libfoo.so
echo 'int foo (void) { extern int foo2; return foo2; }' \
| gcc -shared -fpic -o libbar.so -xc - -xnone ./libfoo.so
echo 'extern int foo (void); int main (void) { return foo (); }' \
| gcc -o test -xc - -xnone -Wl,--as-needed ./libbar.so ./libfoo.so \
-Wl,--no-as-needed
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2721
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/2721] --as-needed vs. DT_NEEDED undef symbols checks
--- Additional Comments From jakub at redhat dot com 2006-06-01 15:34 --- http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2006-06/msg9.html -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2721 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
