[Bug libc/4781] binutils 2.17.50.0.7 and later eats up memory when calling gnujava wizards in OpenOffice
--- Additional Comments From drow at sources dot redhat dot com 2007-08-06 18:52 --- HJ suggested this bug should be resolved before 2.18, but that was the day before the glibc patch was identified. Could someone explain to me, in small words, how Jakub's patch could cause this if it is not a binutils bug? Is it really a bug in the GCC unwinder that we are now triggering? I don't see anything fundamentally wrong with the glibc patch and I haven't seen any fixes for the unwinder either. -- What|Removed |Added CC||drow at sources dot redhat ||dot com http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4781 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug libc/4781] binutils 2.17.50.0.7 and later eats up memory when calling gnujava wizards in OpenOffice
--- Additional Comments From jakub at redhat dot com 2007-08-06 18:59 --- I have posted an unwinder patch in the thread I referenced, see http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2006-12/msg00312.html but that was without ChangeLog entry, I got no feedback and forgot about it (because in the meantime I have reverted Jan's glibc patch on fedora-branch and so didn't ever see it again). -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4781 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug libc/4781] binutils 2.17.50.0.7 and later eats up memory when calling gnujava wizards in OpenOffice
--- Additional Comments From drow at sources dot redhat dot com 2007-08-06 19:38 --- Oh, I see. Without that unwinder patch, if the PC wasn't saved we'll end up with a segfault. Since this is coming through Java, I assume we're getting the unwinder re-invoked from the signal handler, and burning out the stack. I still don't get why the binutils patch made a difference, but this is clearly not a binutils bug. If you have a change, it would be nice to get the unwinder fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||INVALID http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4781 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug libc/4781] binutils 2.17.50.0.7 and later eats up memory when calling gnujava wizards in OpenOffice
-- What|Removed |Added Component|binutils|libc Product|binutils|glibc Version|2.18 (HEAD) |2.4 http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4781 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug libc/4781] binutils 2.17.50.0.7 and later eats up memory when calling gnujava wizards in OpenOffice
-- What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2007-08-01 11:24:00 date|| http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4781 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
