On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 1:20 AM Bob Proulx wrote:
> A little more information.
>
> Pádraig Brady wrote:
> > Yuan Cao wrote:
> > > I recently came across the following behavior.
> > >
> > > When using "--traditional x2" or "-x" option, it seems the order of hex
> > > code output for the characters is pairwise reversed (if that's the
> correct
> > > way of describing it).
>
> ‘-x’
> Output as hexadecimal two-byte units. Equivalent to ‘-t x2’.
>
> Outputs 16-bit integers in the *native byte order* of the machine.
> Which may be either big-endian or little-endian depending on the
> machine. Not portable. Depends upon the machine it is run upon.
>
> > If you want to hexdump independently of endianess you can:
> >
> > od -Ax -tx1z -v
>
> The -tx1 option above is portable because it outputs 1-byte units
> instead of 2-byte units which is independent of endianess.
>
> This is the FAQ entry for this topic.
>
>
> https://www.gnu.org/software/coreutils/faq/coreutils-faq.html#The-_0027od-_002dx_0027-command-prints-bytes-in-the-wrong-order_002e
>
> Bob
>
Thanks for pointing me to this documentation.
It just feels strange because the order does not reflect the order of the
characters in the file.
I think it might have been useful to get the "by word" value of the file if
you are working with a binary file historically. One might have stored some
data as a list of shorts. Then, we can easily view the data using "od -x
data_file_name".
Since memory is so cheap now, people are probably using just using chars
for text, and 4 byte ints or 8 byte ints where they used to use 2 byte ints
(shorts) before. In this case, the "by word" order does not seem to me to
be as useful and violates the principle of least astonishment needlessly.
It might be interesting to change the option to print values by double word
or quadword instead or add another option to let the users choose to print
by double word or quadword if they want.
Best Regards,
Yuan
