df not for subfs?
Hello, I'm using df under Suse Linux 10.0 df --version df (GNU coreutils) 5.3.0 Geschrieben von Torbjorn Granlund, David MacKenzie und Paul Eggert. Copyright (C) 2005 Free Software Foundation, Inc. and found, there is no correct values on USB-devices: df -h -a -l -T -x proc |grep subfs /dev/hdf1subfs0,0K 0,0K 0,0K - /media/zip /dev/hdf4subfs0,0K 0,0K 0,0K - /media/zip_1 /dev/fd0 subfs0,0K 0,0K 0,0K - /media/floppy /dev/sde1subfs0,0K 0,0K 0,0K - /media/HAUPTPLATTE du -s /media/HAUPTPLATTE (after an ls /media/HAUPTPLATTE) 3,3G/media/HAUPTPLATTE Is there a new version? Greatings from Berlin, Germany Günter ___ Bug-coreutils mailing list Bug-coreutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
Re: df not for subfs?
Günter wrote: > ... there is no correct values on USB-devices: > > df -h -a -l -T -x proc |grep subfs > /dev/hdf1subfs0,0K 0,0K 0,0K - /media/zip > /dev/hdf4subfs0,0K 0,0K 0,0K - /media/zip_1 > /dev/fd0 subfs0,0K 0,0K 0,0K - /media/floppy > /dev/sde1subfs0,0K 0,0K 0,0K - /media/HAUPTPLATTE It appears that something failed getting the file system values. Try debugging this using strace. The following produces useful debug output on my GNU/Linux system for usb storage devices. LC_ALL=C strace -v -e fstat64 df -l Please run that, making whatever adjustments needed for your system, and report the results back to the mailing list. I suspect that the system call is failing. If so then this is a kernel issue since the kernel implements the underlying interface to the usb storage media. > Is there a new version? > I'm using df under Suse Linux 10.0 > > df --version > df (GNU coreutils) 5.3.0 That is quite an old version having been released on 2005-01-08. The current release is coreutils 6.9 from 2007-03-22. See this release annoucement for more information. http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/coreutils-announce/2007-03/msg0.html Details of obtaining the latest GNU coreutils are in the release announcement. Or since you are using a vendor supplied version you might check with your vendor for updates and bug fixes. Bob ___ Bug-coreutils mailing list Bug-coreutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
Re: df not for subfs?
Bob Proulx wrote: It appears that something failed getting the file system values. Try debugging this using strace. The following produces useful debug output on my GNU/Linux system for usb storage devices. Most likely that is the case as this subfs does not appear to have been actively maintained since 2004, before the 2.6 kernel series new world plug and play order came about. I'd suggest updating your distribution to a new one that does not use subfs. ___ Bug-coreutils mailing list Bug-coreutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
Re: df not for subfs?
Hello Phillip, thanks for your answer, I'will update to 10.3 before new year, but first do any important things ... I think about murphy's law ;-) Original-Nachricht > Datum: Mon, 03 Dec 2007 13:29:21 -0500 > Von: Phillip Susi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > An: "Günter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, bug-coreutils@gnu.org > Betreff: Re: df not for subfs? > Bob Proulx wrote: > > It appears that something failed getting the file system values. Try > > debugging this using strace. The following produces useful debug > > output on my GNU/Linux system for usb storage devices. > > Most likely that is the case as this subfs does not appear to have been > actively maintained since 2004, before the 2.6 kernel series new world > plug and play order came about. I'd suggest updating your distribution > to a new one that does not use subfs. > > -- Pt! Schon vom neuen GMX MultiMessenger gehört? Der kann`s mit allen: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/multimessenger ___ Bug-coreutils mailing list Bug-coreutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
