»¶Ó­¹âÁÙÁªÃËÍøÕ¾£­£­£­£­£­£­£­£­£­£­£­

2002-03-07 Thread ÁªÃËÍøÕ¾
Title: »¶Ó­¹âÁÙÁªÃËÍøÕ¾




  


  


  

  


  

  


  

  







  

  


  
  
  
  
  
  



  

  


  

  

  
  

  


  

  

  
  

  



  




  




  



  

  


  

  µØÖ·(Add.)£º¶Ø»ÍÊÐÑô¹ØÎ÷·18ºÅ¡¡ÓÊÕþ±àÂ룺736200
  µç»°(Tel.)£º+86-0937-8836058 0937-8823155-8266
  ´«Õ棺0937-8841337¡¡E-mail£º [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  

  



  






ChemNet.comChemyahoo.com

2002-03-07 Thread Chemnet . com
Title: Chemnet.com





  
 

  

  

  ChemNet.com×ÔÓëµÂ¹úBuyersGuideChem.de¡¢°Ä´óÀûÑÇChemlink
.com.au³É¹¦ºÏ×÷ºó£¬ÈÕÇ°ÓÖÉÏÈ«ÇòÕ½ÂÔÐĄ̂½×£¬ÓÚ2ÔÂ28ÈÕÕýʽºÏ²¢È«Çò×î´óµÄ»¯¹¤Êý¾Ý¿â¼°ËÑË÷ÒýÇæChemyahoo.com£¬Â¡ÖØÍƳö¼¯Ò»Á÷µÄÐÅÏ¢Ìṩ¡¢¶¥¼¶×¨ÒµËÑË÷ÒýÇæ¡¢ÐÂÒ»´úB2B½»Ò×ϵͳΪһÌåµÄÈ«Çò»¯¹¤ÃÅ»§¡£

ºÏ²¢ºó½«Ê¹ÓÃChemnet.comÆ·ÅÆ£¬Ô­Chemyahoo.comÓû§¿ÉÔÚChemnet.comÉϼÌÐøÏíÊÜÆäÔ­ÏàÓ¦·þÎñ¡£ChemNet.com½«Ç¿Á¦Íƶ¯È«Çò»¯¹¤ÆóÒµ¿ªÍعú¼ÊóÒס£

  



 
 
 



  
  

  
ÊÀ ½ç »¯ ¹¤ ÃÅ »§ , ¹ú ¼Ê ÉÌ Ã³ ͨ µÀ !
  
  È«Çò»¯¹¤Íø£¨www.chemnet.com£©ÊÇÊÀ½çÊ×Ñ¡µÄ»¯¹¤ÃÅ»§ÍøÕ¾¡£Ëü¼¯È«Çò»¯¹¤ÍøÂçÐÅÏ¢Óëµç×ÓÉÌÎñÖ®´ó³É£¬½«ÊÀ½çÒ»Á÷µÄÐÅÏ¢Ìṩ¡¢ËÑË÷ÒýÇæ¡¢½»Ò×ϵͳºÏΪһÌ壬ΪȫÇò»¯¹¤¿ÍÉÌÌṩÁË׿ԽµÄÔÚÏßÉÌóƽ̨¡£
  


  ÍøÕ¾ÓÅÊÆ

www.chemnet.comÒÔÆäÌØÊâµÄÀúÊ·Ô¨Ô´ºÍÈ«ÇòÓ°ÏìÁ¦£¬¼®ÊÀ½çÁìÏȵÄB2B½»Ò×ϵͳ¡¢×¨ÒµÒýÇæºÍÐÅÏ¢×ÊÔ´£¬ÎªÄúÌṩÎ޿ɱÈÄâµÄÉÌÒµÏÈ»ú--
1£®www.chemnet.comÓòÃûÓÐÁùÄêÀúÊ·£¬ÖÜתÊÀ½çËÄ´óÖÞÁù¸ö¹ú¼ÒÃûÂúÈ«Çò
2£®ºÏ²¢È«Çò×î´óµÄ»¯¹¤Êý¾Ý¿â¼°ÒýÇæChemyahoo.com£¬ÍƳö¶¥¼¶×¨ÒµÄ¿Â¼ÒýÇæ
3£®Í¬ÃÀ¹ú¡¢µÂ¹ú¡¢º«¹ú¡¢ÈÕ±¾¡¢°Ä´óÀûÑǵȻ¯¹¤ÍøÕ¾½áÃËΪȫÇò»¯¹¤¹²Í¬Ìå"
4£®ÄÚÖùúÄÚÊ×´´¡¢¹ú¼ÊÁìÏÈ£¬¸Äд´«Í³½»Ò×·½Ê½µÄÐÂÒ»´úÕæÕýB2B½»Ò×ϵͳ
5£®¹úÄÚ»¯¹¤ÃÅ»§Öйú»¯¹¤ÍøÇãÁ¦Í¶È룬ºÏÁ¦´òͨ»¥¶¯È«ÇòµÄóÒ×ͨµÀ 

  
  ÖªÃû¶È

¹ú¼Ê£ºChemNetÊÇÓÉÓ¢ÎÄchemical(»¯¹¤)network£¨ÍøÂ磩¼ò³Æ×éºÏ¶øÀ´£¬¹«ÈÏÓÐÖ±¹ÛµÄ»¯¹¤ÍøµÄÒâ˼,ÊÇ»¯¹¤ÍøÂç½çµÄȨÍþÓòÃû¡£
www.chemnet.comµ®ÉúÓÚ1995Äê2ÔÂ,ÏȺóÖÜתÃÀ¹ú¡¢Ó¡¶È¡¢ Èðµä¡¢°Ä´óÀûÑÇ¡¢º«¹ú¡¢ÖйúËÄ´óÖÞÁù¸ö¹ú¼Ò£¬ÃûÂúÈ«Çò¡£ÒÔ¸ÃÓòÃû¼ÓÉÏÆäËû¹ú¼Ò»òµØÇøÓòÃûºó׺µÄÑÜÉúÓòÃû¹¹½¨µÄƽ̨¾ÍÓÐ100¶à¸ö£¬Á´½Ó±é²¼È«Çò¸÷´óËÑË÷ÒýÇæºÍ»¯¹¤ÉÌÒµ¡¢¿ÆÑС¢½ÌÓýµÈ»ú¹¹£¬ÎªÈ«ÇòµÄ»¯¹¤¿ÍÉÌËùÊìÖª¡£

¹úÄÚ£ºÖйú»¯¹¤ÍøÔÚ¿ç¹ú¹Ù˾Öл÷°Ü°Ä´óÀûÑÇ×î´óµÄ»¯¹¤¼¯ÍÅORICA¹«Ë¾£¬Ó®µÃÎÒ¹úÈëÊÀ¿ç¹ú֪ʶ²úȨ¾À·×µÚÒ»°¸£¬ Áî¼ÛֵǧÍòÃÀ½ðµÄÓòÃûwww.chemnet.comÂ仧Öйú£¬²¢ÔÚ´ËÓòÃûÏ´´½¨ÁËÊÀ½çÊ×Ñ¡µÄ»¯¹¤ÃÅ»§ÍøÕ¾£¬³ÉΪÈËÃñÈÕ±¨¡¢CCTV¡¢Ð»ªÉç¡¢Öйú¹ú¼Ê¹ã²¥µç̨¡¢ÖÐÐÂÉç¡¢ÖйúÈÕ±¨¡¢Ïã¸ÛÎĻ㱨¡¢½â·ÅÈÕ±¨¡¢Öйú»¯¹¤±¨¡¢ÑÅ»¢¡¢ÐÂÀË¡¢ËѺüµÈÖ÷Á÷ýÌå¹Ø×¢µÄ½¹µã,£¬400¶à¼ÒýÌå²ÎÓ뱨µÀ£¬¾Ù¹úÖõÄ¿¡£

  
  Ö÷ÒªÀ¸Ä¿

1£®»¯¹¤Ä¿Â¼(Directory) 2£®½»Ò×ÖÐÐÄ(Exchange) 3£®Êý¾Ý¿â(Suppliers) 4£®Ã³Ò×»ú»á(Trade
Leads) 5£®Õ¹»áÐÅÏ¢(Expo) 6£®»¯¹¤×Öµä(Dictionary) 

  
  ׿Խ·þÎñ

È«Çò»¯¹¤Íø׿ԽµÄ·þÎñÆ·ÖÊÌåÏÖÔÚÆ䳬Խ³£¹æµÄ·þÎñÀíÄî--Ϊ»¯¹¤Óû§´òÔìÈ«Çò»¯µÄÐÐÒµÃÅ»§¡¢ÓªÔì¹ú¼Ê»¯µÄÉÌó»·¾³¡¢ÌṩÁìÏÈÊÀ½çµÄ½»Ò×ϵͳ¡£
1£® ΪÆóÒµËÜÔì¹ú¼ÊÐÎÏó¡¢Ê÷Á¢¹ú¼ÊÆ·ÅÆÌṩ¿ì½Ý¡¢ÓÐЧµÄ;¾¶¡£
2£® ƽ̨±é²¼È«ÇòµÄ·ÃÎÊÕß¼°ºÏ×÷»ï°éÓªÔìÒ»Á÷µÄ¹ú¼Ê»¯ÉÌó»·¾³ 
3£® ƽ̨µÄ½»Ò×ϵͳ£¨Exchange£©ÌṩÐÂÒ»´úÍêÉƸßЧµÄµç×ÓÉÌÎñ½â¾ö·½°¸¡£

  
  ·þÎñÏîÄ¿

È«Çò»¯¹¤Íøwww.chemnet.comÔÚÖйú´ó½ĿǰÖ÷ÒªÌṩ¾²Ì¬¹ã¸æ¡¢¹Ø¼ü×Ö¹ã¸æ¡¢Öйú¹©Ó¦É̺ÍÃâ·Ñ¶þ¼¶ÓòÃû×¢²áËÄÏî·þÎñ¡£
  




  »¯¹¤ÃÅ»§--ÐÐÒµÐÅÏ¢¾¡À¿ÑÛµ×£¡
  


  ÒÔÉÌΪ±¾--ÖúÄú¿ªÍØÈ«ÇòÉÌ»ú£¡

  
  


  
º¼ÖÝÖл¯ÍøÂçÓÐÏÞ¹«Ë¾ ¡¡Tel:0086-571-88868638¡¡ 
  Fax:0086-571-88868972




  

Bug: Name keyword expansion

2002-03-07 Thread Uwe Hamburger

Hello!

When updating a File (with options: retrieve tag) which is already local
with the correct revision, the keyword 'Name' is not expanded.

I think it is OK not to update the File, but the Keyword 'Name' should be
expanded nevertheless.

I think it is a bug!

Best Regards

Uwe Hamburger

-- 
GMX - Die Kommunikationsplattform im Internet.
http://www.gmx.net


___
Bug-cvs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-cvs



bug-cvs@gnu.org

2002-03-07 Thread dongfangyutong

±±¾©¶«·½Óïͨ·­ÒëÖÐÐÄÊÇÔÚ¹¤É̾ÖÕýʽע²áµÄÒÔÍâÎÄ·­ÒëΪÖ÷µÄרҵ·þÎñ»ú¹¹£¬ÓÈÆäÉó¤¸÷רҵ¼¼ÊõÎļþ¡¢×ÊÁÏ¡¢Êé¼®µÄ·­Òë¡¢ÍøÕ¾ºº»¯¼°ÍâÎÄÍøÕ¾ÖÆ×÷¡£

ÎÒÃǵķ­Ò붼ÊÇÓÐÊ®ÄêÒÔÉϹ¤×÷¾­ÑéµÄרҵÈËÔ±£¬·­ÒëÖÊÁ¿¿É¿¿¡£

ÎÒÃÇÓµÓÐÒ»Ì×ÑϸñµÄÖÊÁ¿¹ÜÀíÌåϵ£¬±¾×Å¡°ÖÊÁ¿¡¢Ð§ÂÊ¡¢°²È«¡¢·½±ã¡±µÄ·þÎñ×ÚּΪ¹ã´óÖÐÍâ¿Í»§ÌṩÓÅÖÊ¡¢Ñ¸½Ý¡¢¹æ·¶¡¢¿É¿¿µÄ·þÎñ¡£

ÓïÖÖ£ºÓ¢ÓµÂÓÈÕÓÆÏÌÑÑÀÓÒâ´óÀûÓïµÈ¡£


×£Äú½ÚÈÕÓä¿ì£¬ÍòÊÂÈçÒ⣡

±±¾©¶«·½Óïͨ·­ÒëÖÐÐÄ

µç»°£º010-62987225£¬13910430340
µç×ÓÓʼþ£º[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Http: www.east-trans.com

___
Bug-cvs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-cvs



Re: Bug: Name keyword expansion

2002-03-07 Thread Ingolf Steinbach

Hi, Uwe!

* Uwe Hamburger [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-03-07 15:15]:
 When updating a File (with options: retrieve tag) which is already local
 with the correct revision, the keyword 'Name' is not expanded.

See http://www.cvshome.org/docs/manual/cvs_12.html#SEC98
for a description when $Name$ is expanded. (While this
section only mentions cvs checkout, it applies to
cvs export, too.)

Regards
Ingolf
-- 

Ingolf Steinbach   Jena-Optronik GmbH
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   ++49 3641 200-147
PGP: 0x7B3B5661  213C 828E 0C92 16B5  05D0 4D5B A324 EC04

___
Bug-cvs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-cvs



GISGPSRS

2002-03-07 Thread meeting-3s






  2002±±¾©¹ú¼Ê3S£¨GIS¡¢GPS¡¢RS£©¼¼ÊõÑÐÌÖôßչʾ»áThe 2rd Beijing International 3S Technical Symposium   
The 4rd Beijing International GIS Symposium and  
Exhibition 
  »áÒéµØµã£º±±¾©Î÷½¼±ö¹Ý£¨º£µíÇøÎåµÀ¿ÚÍõׯ·18ºÅ£© 
±¨µ½Ê±¼ä£º2002Äê4ÔÂ1ÈÕ ²¼Õ¹Ê±¼ä£º4ÔÂ1ÈÕ »áÒéÕ¹ÀÀʱ¼ä£º4ÔÂ2ÈÕ¡ª 4ÈÕ  
À뿪ʱ¼ä£º4ÔÂ5ÈÕÉÏÎç 
 
3SµÄÓ¦ÓÃÇ°¾°£ºÔÚδÀ´¼¸ÄêÄÚ£¬µØÀí¿Õ¼äÐÅÏ¢(3S)½«ÊµÏÖËæʱ(anytime)ËæµØ(anywhere)ΪËùÓеÄÈË(anybody)ºÍÊÂ(anything)Ìṩʵʱ·þÎñ(4A·þÎñ)¡£ 
 
É3SµÄ´«Í³Ó¦Óà ¿ªÍØ3SеÄÓ¦Óà ÓÃÐÂ˼·½¨ÉèÊý×Ö³ÇÊÐ  
È«ÃæÌáÉýÖйúÐÅÏ¢»¯Ë®Æ½ÈëÊÀ¼°Éê°Â³É¹¦½«È«ÃæÌáÉýÊý×ÖÖйú½¨Éè 
 
  ÑûÇ뺯
  
ÄúÄÜÏëÏóÔÚ²»¾ÃµÄ½«À´£¨Ò²Ðí¾ÍÔÚÃ÷Ä꣩£¬ÄúÖ»ÐèÒªÒ»¸öÊÖ»ú¡¢Ò»¿é±í»òÆäËüËæÉíСÎï¼þ¾Í¿ÉÒÔ׼ȷ¶¨Î»ÓÚ¸ßÂ¥´óÏÃÖ®¼ä»ò´Ôɽ¾þÁëÖ®µß£¬ÏíÊÜ3S¼¼Êõ´øÀ´µÄȫй¤×÷ÓëÉú»î±ãÀû£¿  
ÄúΪÄúµ¥Î»ÐÅÏ¢»¯Ë®Æ½µÍ¡¢Ê¼ÖÕÕÒ²»µ½·¢Õ¹Ö®Â·¶øÀ§»óÂ𣿽¨Á¢ÍøÕ¾¡¢¼òµ¥µÄµç×ÓÉÌÎñ²»ÊÇÐÅÏ¢»¯Ö®±¾£¬È«ÃæÓ¦ÓÃ3S¼¼Êõ½«Õ¼ÁìÐÅÏ¢¼¼ÊõµÄÖƸߵ㡣  
Äúµ¥Î»Îª½«À´µÄ·¢Õ¹×öºÃ×¼±¸ÁËÂð£¿ÔÚÇ¿µ÷¿ì½ÝÓë¸ßЧ·þÎñµÄ½ñÌ죬ÔÚÏû·ÑÕßÔ½À´Ô½Ç¿µ÷·þÎñµÄ½ñÌ죬ÔÚÒ»ÇÐÒÔÓû§²»¶Ï±ä»¯µÄÐèÇóÓë·þÎñΪ¾­ÓªÖ®±¾µÄÃ÷Ì죬ÄúÖªµÀ3S½«·¢»ÓʲôÖØÒªµÄ×÷ÓÃÂ𣿠 
Äú¹«Ë¾ÕÒ²»µ½ÀûÈóÔö³¤µã£¬²»ÖªÖг¤ÆÚ¿ÉÄܳöÏÖµÄÈ«Éç»á¶¼¹Ø×¢²¢ÕùÏàÓ¦ÓõÄм¼ÊõÈȵ㣿ÄÇôÇëÏÖÔÚͶÉí3S¼¼ÊõµÄ¿ª·¢ÓëÓ¦Óᣠ 
Äú×öºÃ×¼±¸ÓÚ2002Äê3ÔÂ31ÈÕÆð³ÌÀ´±±¾©²Î»áÁËÂ𣿠
 
 
Ö÷°ìµ¥Î»  
²â»æÒ£¸ÐÐÅÏ¢¹¤³Ì¹ú¼ÒÖصãʵÑéÊÒ  
ÖпÆÔº×ÊÔ´Óë»·¾³ÐÅϢϵͳ¹ú¼ÒÖصãʵÑéÊÒ  
¹ú¼ÒÒ£¸ÐÓ¦Óù¤³Ì¼¼ÊõÑо¿ÖÐÐÄ  
 
 ¹ú¼ÒGPSÓ¦Óù¤³Ì¼¼ÊõÑо¿ÖÐÐÄ  
±±¾©´óѧң¸ÐÓëGISÑо¿Ëù  
Öйúº£ÍâµØÀíÐÅϢϵͳЭ»á ¹ú¼ÊÉãÓ°²âÁ¿ÓëÒ£¸ÐЭ»á°îÁªÊý¾Ý¿âÓ뻥²Ù×÷¹¤×÷×é 
 ¹ú¼ÊÉãÓ°²âÁ¿ÓëÒ£¸ÐЭ»á¿Õ¼äÊý¾Ý¹ÜÀí¼¯³Éϵͳ¹¤×÷×é 
 
Ö§³Öµ¥Î» 
 ¹ú¼ÒÏà¹Ø²¿Î¯ÐÅÏ¢ÖÐÐÄ 
 ²¿·ÖÊ¡ÊÐÐÅÏ¢°ì 
 Ïà¹Ø¹æ»®²â»æÔºµÈÊ®¼¸¼Òµ¥Î» 
³Ð°ìµ¥Î»  
±±¾©Ã÷ÈÕ²ÊÔƹã¸æÓÐÏÞ¹«Ë¾ 
ÌرðÖ§³ÖýÌå 
 ¡¶3SÊÀ½ç¡· 
 
 ÄúÁ˽â3SÈçºÎÌáÉý´«Í³ÐÐÒµÂ𣿠 
ÄúÀ´×ÔÓÚ×ÔÀ´Ë®¡¢µçÁ¦¡¢ÃºÆøµÈÐÐÒµ£¬ÄúÖªµÀGISÈçºÎ¿ì½Ý׼ȷ¶¨Î»¹ÜµÀ¡¢¹ÜÏß¹ÊÕÏÂð£¿ÄúÖªµÀ3SÈçºÎ×ö¹ÜÏßÑ¡ÐÍÓÅ»¯£¬¸üÓÐЧÌá¸ß¹ÜÀíÄÜÁ¦Â𣿠 
ÄúÀ´×ÔÓÚ¹úÍÁ¡¢½»Í¨¡¢Ë®µç¡¢¼Æί¡¢²â»æ¡¢µçÐŵÈÐÐÒµ¹ÜÀí»ú¹Ø£¬ÄúÁ˽â3S¼¼ÊõÏÖÔÚÒÑÈÕÐÂÔÂÒƵط¢Õ¹ÁËÂð£¿ÄúÖªµÀ²ÉÓÃ3S¼¼Êõ½«²úÉúʲô±ä»¯Â𣿠 
ÄúÀ´×Ô3S´«Í³Ó¦Óõĵؿ󡢿±Ì½µÈ²¿ÃÅ£¬ÄúÁ˽â3SµÄ¸üÐÂÌæ´ú²úÆ·¡¢×îз¢Õ¹ÏÖ×´¼°ÈçºÎ½â¾öÄúʹÓÃÖеÄÎÊÌâÂ𣿠 
Ö»Óи÷µ¥Î»¸÷ÐÐÒµÆëÐÄЭÁ¦£¬Êý×ÖÖйú½¨Éè²Å²»½ö½öÊǿںš£ 
 Äúµ¥Î»ÍÏÑÓÖйúÊý×Ö»¯½¨ÉèµÄ½ø³ÌÁËÂ𣿠
 ¸üйÛÄ´ÓÏÖÔÚ×öÆð£¬Âõ¿ªÒ»²½º£À«Ìì¿Õ¡£ 
 ¿ìÀ´±¨Ãû²Î»á°É£¬±¾´Î»áÕ¹´ø¸øÄúµÄ²»½ö½öÊÇѧϰÓë½»Á÷¡£ 
 
  3SÇé¿ö½éÉÜ

  
Êý×ÖµØÇòµÄ¸ÅÄîÊÇËÄÄêÇ°ÓÉÃÀ¹úÇ°¸±×Üͳ¸ê¶ûÌá³öµÄ¡£Êý×ÖµØÇòÖ÷ÒªÖ¸Ó¦ÓõØÀíÐÅϢϵͳ£¨GIS£©¡¢È«Çò¶¨Î»ÏµÍ³£¨GPS£©¡¢Ò£¸Ð£¨RS£©µÈ¼¼Êõ£¬ÒÔÊý×ֵķ½Ê½»ñÈ¡¡¢´¦ÀíºÍÓ¦ÓùØÓÚµØÇò×ÔÈ»ºÍÈËÎÄÒòËصĿռäÊý¾Ý£¬²¢ÔÚ´Ë»ù´¡ÉϽâ¾öÈ«Çò¸÷ÖÖÎÊÌâ¡£Èç½ñ£¬ÐÅÏ¢¼¼Êõ¸ïÃüϯ¾íÈ«Çò£¬Ê¹ÈËÀà¶ÔµØÇò¿Õ¼äÊý¾Ý½øÐд¦Àí¡¢·ÖÎöµÄ¼¼ÊõÊֶκ͹ÛÄî·¢ÉúÁË·­Ì츲µØµÄ±ä»¯¡£ÔÚÕâÖÖÇé¿öÏ£¬ÈËÃÇ¿ÉÒÔ°ÑÓйصØÇòµÄ´óÁ¿µÄ¡¢¶à·Ö±æÂʵġ¢ÈýάµÄ¡¢¶¯Ì¬µÄÊý¾Ý°´µØÀí×ø±ê¼¯³ÉÆðÀ´£¬ÐγÉÒ»¸öÊý×ÖµØÇò¡£½èÖúÓÚÕâ¸öÊý×ÖµØÇò£¬ÈËÃÇÎÞÂÛ×ßµ½ÄÄÀ¶¼¿ÉÒÔ°´µØÀí×ø±êÁ˽âµØÇòÉÏÈκÎÒ»´¦¡¢Èκη½ÃæµÄÐÅÏ¢¡£Êý×ÖµØÇòÊǶÔÕæʵµØÇò¼°ÆäÏà¹ØÏÖÏóͳһÐÔµÄÊý×Ö»¯ÖØÏÖºÍÈÏʶ£¬ºËÐÄ˼ÏëÓÐÁ½µã£ºÒ»ÊÇÓÃÊý×Ö»¯ÊÖ¶ÎͳһµØ´¦ÀíµØÇòÎÊÌ⣻¶þÊÇ×î´óÏ޶ȵØÀûÓÃÐÅÏ¢×ÊÔ´¡£Êý×ÖµØÇòÓÉÏÂÁÐÌåϵ¹¹³É£ºÊý¾Ý»ñÈ¡Óë¸üÐÂÌåϵ¡¢Êý¾Ý´¦ÀíÓë´æ´¢Ìåϵ¡¢ÐÅÏ¢ÌáÈ¡Óë·ÖÎöÌåϵ¡¢Êý¾ÝÓëÐÅÏ¢´«²¥Ìåϵ¡¢Êý¾Ý¿âÌåϵ¡¢ÍøÂçÌåϵ¡¢×¨ÓÃÈí¼þÌåϵµÈ¡£Êý×ÖµØÇò¿ÉÒÔ°üÈÝ80£¥ÒÔÉϵÄÈËÀàÐÅÏ¢×ÊÔ´£¬ÊÇδÀ´ÐÅÏ¢×ÊÔ´µÄÖ÷ÌåºËÐÄ¡£  
½ü¼¸ÄêÀ´£¬È«ÇòÊý×Ö»¯È¡µÃÁËÍ»·ÉÃͽøµÄ·¢Õ¹¡£ÔÚÈ«ÇòÐÅÏ¢Êý×Ö»¯µÄʵʩ¹ý³ÌÖУ¬µØÇò¿Õ¼äÐÅÏ¢¼¼Êõ£¨3S,¼´GIS¡¢GPS¡¢RS£©Æð×ÅÊ®·ÖÖØÒªµÄ×÷Óã¬GIS¡¢RS¡¢GPSµÄ¼¯³É¹¹¼ÜÁËÊý×ÖµØÇò¡£1999Äê11ÔÂ19ÈÕ£¬ÔÚ±±¾©ÕÙ¿ªÁË¡°Êý×ÖµØÇò¹ú¼Ê»áÒ顱£¬  
Àîá°Ç帱×ÜÀíÔÚ»áÉÏÌá³ö£¬Öйú½«Á¦ÕùÔÚÊý×ÖµØÇò½¨ÉèÖÐʵÏÖ¿çԽʽ·¢Õ¹¡£ µØÀíÐÅϢϵͳ£¨Geographical  
Information  
System,GIS£©Êǽü¶þÊ®ÄêÀ´·¢Õ¹ÆðÀ´µÄÒ»ÃÅ×ÛºÏÓ¦ÓÃϵͳ£¬ËüÄܰѸ÷ÖÖÐÅϢͬµØÀíλÖúÍÓйصÄÊÓͼ½áºÏÆðÀ´£¬²¢°ÑµØÀíѧ¡¢¼¸ºÎѧ¡¢¼ÆËã»ú¿Æѧ¼°¸÷ÖÖÓ¦ÓöÔÏó¡¢Internet¡¢¶àýÌå¼¼Êõ¼°ÐéÄâÏÖʵ¼¼ÊõµÈÈÚΪһÌ壬ÀûÓüÆËã»úͼÐÎÓëÊý¾Ý¿â¼¼ÊõÀ´²É¼¯¡¢´æ´¢¡¢±à¼­¡¢ÏÔʾ¡¢×ª»»¡¢·ÖÎöºÍÊä³öµØÀíͼÐμ°ÆäÊôÐÔÊý¾Ý¡£ÕâÑù£¬¾Í¿É¸ù¾ÝÓû§ÐèÒª½«ÕâЩÐÅϢͼÎIJ¢Ã¯µØÊäË͸øÓû§£¬±ãÓÚʹÓᣠ 
È«Çò¶¨Î»ÏµÍ³£¨Global Positioning  
System,GPS£©ÊÇÉÏÊÀ¼Í70Äê´úÓÉÃÀ¹ú¹ú·À²¿Åú×¼£¬Â½º£¿ÕÈý¾üÁªºÏÑÐÖƵÄÐÂÒ»´ú¿Õ¼äÎÀÐǵ¼º½¶¨Î»ÏµÍ³¡£ÆäÖ÷ҪĿµÄÊÇΪ½¡¢º£¡¢¿ÕÈý´óÁìÓòÌṩʵʱ¡¢È«ÌìºòºÍÈ«ÇòÐԵĵ¼º½·þÎñ¡£È«Çò¶¨Î»ÏµÍ³¹²ÓÉÈý²¿·Ö¹¹³É£ºµØÃæ¿ØÖƲ¿·Ö¡¢¿Õ¼ä²¿·Ö¡¢Óû§×°Öò¿·ÖµÈ¡£GPSµÄÖ÷ÒªÌصãÊÇÈ«Ììºò¡¢È«Çò¸²¸Ç¡¢Èýά¶¨ËÙ¶¨Ê±¸ß¾«¶È¡¢¿ìËÙʡʱ¸ßЧÂʼ°Ó¦Óù㷺¶à¹¦ÄÜ¡£  
Ò£¸Ð(Remote  
Sensing,RS)£¬¹ËÃû˼Ò壬¾ÍÊÇÒ£Ô¶µØ¸ÐÖª¡£ÈËÀàͨ¹ý´óÁ¿µÄʵ¼ù£¬·¢ÏÖµØÇòÉÏÿһ¸öÎïÌ嶼ÔÚ²»Í£µØÎüÊÕ¡¢·¢ÉäºÍ·´ÉäÐÅÏ¢ºÍÄÜÁ¿£¬ÆäÖÐÓÐÒ»ÖÖÈËÀàÒѾ­ÈÏʶµ½µÄÐÎʽ¡ª¡ªµç´Å²¨£¬²¢ÇÒ·¢ÏÖ²»Í¬ÎïÌåµÄµç´Å²¨ÌØÐÔÊDz»Í¬µÄ¡£Ò£¸Ð¾ÍÊǸù¾ÝÕâ¸öÔ­ÀíÀ´Ì½²âµØ±íÎïÌå¶Ôµç´Å²¨µÄ·´ÉäºÍÆä·¢ÉäµÄµç´Å²¨£¬´Ó¶øÌáÈ¡ÕâЩÎïÌåµÄÐÅÏ¢£¬Íê³ÉÔ¶¾àÀëʶ±ðÎïÌå¡£  
Ò£¸ÐµÄʵÏÖ»¹ÐèÒªÒ£¸Ðƽ̨£¬ÏñÎÀÐÇ¡¢·É»ú¡¢ÆøÇòµÈ£¬ËüÃǵÄ×÷ÓþÍÊÇÎȶ¨µØÔËÔØ´«¸ÐÆ÷¡£µ±ÔÚµØÃæÊÔÑéʱ£¬»¹»áÓõ½µØÃæÏóÈý½Ç¼ÜÕâÑù¼òµ¥µÄÒ£¸Ðƽ̨¡£Õë¶Ô²»Í¬µÄÓ¦ÓúͲ¨¶Î·¶Î§£¬ÈËÃÇÒѾ­Ñо¿³öºÜ¶àÖÖ´«¸ÐÆ÷£¬Ì½²âºÍ½ÓÊÕÎïÌåÔڿɼû¹â¡¢ºìÍâÏߺÍ΢²¨·¶Î§Äڵĵç´Å·øÉä¡£´«¸ÐÆ÷»á°ÑÕâЩµç´Å·øÉä°´ÕÕÒ»¶¨µÄ¹æÂÉת»»ÎªÔ­Ê¼Í¼Ïñ¡£Ô­Ê¼Í¼Ïñ±»µØÃæÕ¾½ÓÊÕºó£¬Òª¾­¹ýһϵÁи´ÔӵĴ¦Àí£¬²ÅÄÜÌṩ¸ø²»Í¬µÄÓû§Ê¹Óᣠ 

¿Ü·Î¿òÀ» ´Þ·¡µå¸±²²¿ä (¼ºÀÎ-±¤°í)

2002-03-07 Thread 57opo

  
  






¿Ü·Î¿òÀ» ´Þ·¡ÁÙ ¾ÖÀÎÀÌ ÇÊ¿äÇÒ¶§ 
24½Ã°£ ±â´Ù¸®°í ÀÖ¾î¿ä
   

1.  ÀüÈ­±â¸¦ µé°í
   060-707-7749   ¸¦ ´©¸£¼¼¿ä.
   
   (Àü±¹½Ã³»¿ä±Ý) 


°¡ÀÔºñ ¾ø½¿

2. ¿Ü·Î¿òÀ» ´Þ·¡ÁÙ ´ëÈ­»ó´ë°¡ ÇÊ¿äÇϽźÐ.

3. Áö±Ý ÀüÈ­¸¦ µé°í 060-707-7749¸¦ ´­·¯ÁÖ¼¼¿ä

5. °¡ÀÔÈÄ °ø°³°Ô½ÃÆÇ¿¡ ÀÚ½ÅÀÇ °³ÀÎÇÁ·ÎÇÊÀ» °­·ÂÇÏ°Ô ¾îÇÊÇغ¸¼¼¿ä
 

 ±×´ÙÀ½¿¡ ¹«½¼ÀÏÀÌ ÀϾÁö Ã¥ÀÓ¸øÁ®


** ÀÌÄÉÇÏ¸é ¿Àºü¾ß Ç°À¸·Î ¿­³ª¼½¾¯ ÂßÂß»§»§ ¾ð³ÄµéÀÌ È£¹Ú³ÕÄðó·³ ¿ì·ç·è!! **



º» ¸ÞÀÏÀº Á¤º¸Åë½Å¸Á ÀÌ¿ëÃËÁø¹ý ±ÔÁ¤¿¡ µû¶ó ±¤°í¸ÞÀÏÀÓÀ» Ç¥½ÃÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç ¼ö½Å°ÅºÎÀåÄ¡¸¦ ¸¶·ÃÇÏ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. 
º» ¸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò´Â ÀÎÅͳݻ󿡼­ ¼öÁýÇÑ°ÍÀÌ¸ç ¸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò¿Ü ¾î¶°ÇÑ °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸µµ °®°í ÀÖÁö ¾Ê½À´Ï´Ù
¿øÄ¡ ¾ÊÀº Á¤º¸¿´´Ù¸é Á¤ÁßÈ÷ »ç°ú µå¸®¸ç, ¼ö½Å°ÅºÎ¸¦ ÇØ ÁÖ½Ã¸é ´ÙÀ½ºÎÅÍ´Â ¸ÞÀÏÀÌ ¹ß¼ÛµÇÁö ¾ÊÀ» °ÍÀÔ´Ï´Ù
¼ö½Å°ÅºÎ


  


___
Bug-cvs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-cvs


Re: sccs2rcs to perl

2002-03-07 Thread Larry Jones

Michael Sterrett -Mr. Bones.- writes:
 
 It would be nice to receive some comment from the CVS development team.
 This is the third time I've sent this out the the mailing lists with not
 a peep from anyone about it.  Very disappointing.

contrib/README:

Unsupported also means that no one has volunteered to accept and check
in changes to this directory.  So submissions for new scripts to add
here are unlikely to be accepted.  Suggested changes to the existing
scripts here conceivably might, but that isn't clear either, unless of
course they come from the original author of the script.

If you have some software that works with CVS that you wish to offer it
is suggested that you make it available by FTP or HTTP and then announce
it on the info-cvs mailing list.

-Larry Jones

You can never really enjoy Sundays because in the back of your
mind you know you have to go to school the next day. -- Calvin

___
Bug-cvs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-cvs



Re: sccs2rcs to perl

2002-03-07 Thread Michael Sterrett -Mr. Bones.-

On Thu, 7 Mar 2002, Larry Jones wrote:

 contrib/README:
 
 Unsupported also means that no one has volunteered to accept and check
 in changes to this directory.  So submissions for new scripts to add
 here are unlikely to be accepted.  Suggested changes to the existing
 scripts here conceivably might, but that isn't clear either, unless of
 course they come from the original author of the script.
 
 If you have some software that works with CVS that you wish to offer it
 is suggested that you make it available by FTP or HTTP and then announce
 it on the info-cvs mailing list.
 
 -Larry Jones

Larry --

Thanks for the response.  I guess I'm just a little naive when it
comes to the development process of CVS.  I assumed that any sort of
improvement to the distribution would be welcome.  In my involvement
in open source projects in the past, the maintainers of the projects
have been very receptive and pleased to receive code, which they
didn't have to write.

I see a problem with the CVS code as distributed.  That is, it has
a single csh script which is both slow and makes the CVS code-base
depend on an additional unix utility when it doesn't have to.
I believe I addressed both of these problems with my re-write of the
script in perl.  I've announced it on the info-cvs list (a couple
of times now) and I'd like to make it available via FTP in the CVS
distribution if I could just get some cooperation from you, Derek or
one of the other silent CVS developers.

Thanks,

Michael Sterrett
  -Mr. Bones.-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


___
Bug-cvs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-cvs



Re: sccs2rcs to perl

2002-03-07 Thread Riley Williams

Hi Michael.

 Hi Riley -- Thanks for the reply.  At least now I know that my mail
 is being seen by someone other than myself.

NP.

 Let me address your points at they go...

 I'm not on the CVS development team as such, just being a very happy
 user of CVS...

 Oh, don't be fooled -- I'm a very happy user of CVS too. I just use
 SCCS in my day job because that's what we've always used, but
 that's changing these days -- mostly with the help of the sccs2rcs
 perl script that I included before.

As stated in my original email, I never managed to get on with SCCS on
the only occasion I was expected to use it, so can't really comment on
it in any sort of meaningful way...

 ...but I would like to offer one possible reason for the lack of
 comments: Perhaps those on the list here are like me and don't use
 SCCS in the first place, so have no use for the script.

 True, that could be a reason, but you may be missing the fact that
 I'm not advocating the *addition* of a script, but a *replacement*
 of a script.

If you think about it, you'll soon realise that the difference you refer
to is irrelevant to anybody who doesn't use SCCS - if they don't use
SCCS, then they will have no interest whatsoever in the existence of a
script to convert from SCCS to CVS, much less in how well (or even
whether) the script in question works.

 If you check your CVS distribution, you'll find in the contrib
 directory a sccs2rcs script *already* there. However, it is written
 in csh which is A) slow B) one more dependency for your .deb or .rpm
 to depend on. The perl script that I'm requesting consideration
 addresses both of these issues since the perl script runs about
 twice as fast as the csh version and, since there are already perl
 scripts in the CVS distribution, adds *no* additional dependencies.

To get any comments on either your script or the original one, you'd
need to find somebody else who uses both SCCS and CVS and needs to
convert from SCCS to CVS. Other than that, to be honest, nobody's going
to be interested for the simple reason that they've no reasonable means
to test either script.

 Another possibility is the length of the To: and CC: list in
 your email - I know several people who have their system set up to
 auto-kill any emails with more than three names in those two
 combined simply as a way to cut down the amount of mail they have
 to handle, and your email would not have made it to any of them.

 I have sent this email already twice before -- once to bug-cvs and
 once to user-cvs with very reasonable To: and CC: lines so I don't
 think this is the reason.

I'm on the bug-cvs list but not on the user-cvs list, and I've never
seen your email before the one I replied to. I've been on the bug-cvs
list since last September, so wouldn't have seen it if posted before
then, but if posted since, it apparently didn't get through to that
list, which could explain the lack of response...

 I've also written to Larry Jones (who seems to be the primary person
 committing to the CVS source tree) directly and I got *no* reply -
 not even a go away or not interested!

That much I can't comment on as I don't know Larry's circumstances.
However, if they're anything like me, he probably doesn't have the time
to even read, much less reply to, emails about things he's not directly
interested in.

To put that in context, allow that (after my spam-filter has finished
with them) I receive between 500 and 700 emails a day, mostly from the
Linux-Kernel or the UK-Genealogy mailing lists, and if I even read every
email I received, I'd have little time to do anything else. As it
happens, I read every mail posted to the Linux-8086, Linux-Hams and
Bug-CVS mailing lists, but I only reply to ones where I can make a
positive contribution of some sort. With most of the mailing lists I
receive, I decide whether to read a particular email based on (a) the
sender is somebody important on that list (I read EVERY email from
either Linus Torvalds or Alan Cox on the Linux-Kernel list), or (b) the
subject line catches my attention. If neither of those apply, the email
doesn't get read - it's as simple as that.

Best wishes from Riley.


___
Bug-cvs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-cvs



Re: sccs2rcs to perl

2002-03-07 Thread Michael Sterrett -Mr. Bones.-

On Thu, 7 Mar 2002, Larry Jones wrote:

 Anybody with sccs, CVS, make, and perl almost certainly already has csh,

Well, I don't - at least, I wouldn't if I didn't have to because CVS
depends on csh *only* because of the sccs2rcs csh script.  I'd love to
remove csh from my system, but that would break dependencies (which is
primarily why I re-wrote it in the first place).

chop

 And given the stunning lack of interest shown here, it seems that
 no one really cares.  So, while I'm sure you think it's wonderful and it
 sounds like it was a big benefit to you, I don't any value to adding it
 to the CVS distribution.

Ok, let me try another idea on you then.  Given the stunning lack of
interest which, I admit certainly seems evident, how would you feel about
removing the sccs2rcs script from the CVS distribution?  That'd make me
just as happy.  All future CVS distribution gets smaller and you won't have
to deal with any future bugs in the sccs2rcs script (which I see you had to
patch a couple of times in the last year) -- everybody comes out a winner.

Michael Sterrett
  -Mr. Bones.-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


___
Bug-cvs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-cvs



Re: sccs2rcs to perl

2002-03-07 Thread Greg A. Woods

[ On Thursday, March 7, 2002 at 16:46:04 (-0500), Michael Sterrett -Mr. Bones.- wrote: 
]
 Subject: Re: sccs2rcs to perl

 I see a problem with the CVS code as distributed.  That is, it has
 a single csh script which is both slow and makes the CVS code-base
 depend on an additional unix utility when it doesn't have to.

Well, it's only a contributed utility, not a core part of the CVS code
as distributed.

 I believe I addressed both of these problems with my re-write of the
 script in perl.

No, you did not.  Only a translation to POSIX Shell or C would have
addressed both problems.

While the translation to perl may have made the script run faster, it
only changed the reliance on one semi-standard tool to another less
standard tool (perl is neither commonly available on all unix platforms,
nor is it terribly small and fast, though it may be faster than csh).

-- 
Greg A. Woods

+1 416 218-0098;  [EMAIL PROTECTED];  [EMAIL PROTECTED];  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Planix, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED]; VE3TCP; Secrets of the Weird [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
Bug-cvs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-cvs



Re: sccs2rcs to perl

2002-03-07 Thread Michael Sterrett -Mr. Bones.-

On Thu, 7 Mar 2002, Greg A. Woods wrote:

 [ On Thursday, March 7, 2002 at 16:46:04 (-0500), Michael Sterrett -Mr. Bones$
  Subject: Re: sccs2rcs to perl
 
  I see a problem with the CVS code as distributed.  That is, it has
  a single csh script which is both slow and makes the CVS code-base
  depend on an additional unix utility when it doesn't have to.

 Well, it's only a contributed utility, not a core part of the CVS code
 as distributed.

All the Linux distributions I have access too include sccs2rcs as part
of the CVS package because it is distributed as part of the CVS tar ball.
Because of that, I consider it part of CVS.

  I believe I addressed both of these problems with my re-write of the
  script in perl.

 No, you did not.  Only a translation to POSIX Shell or C would have
 addressed both problems.

Sorry, but I disagree.  There are already a number of perl scripts in the
contrib directory so the package as a whole depends on perl already.
I don't think you can argue that I've not reduced the number of
dependencies for the CVS package.

Michael Sterrett
  -Mr. Bones.-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


___
Bug-cvs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-cvs



Re: sccs2rcs to perl

2002-03-07 Thread Greg A. Woods

[ On Thursday, March 7, 2002 at 17:21:08 (-0500), Michael Sterrett -Mr. Bones.- wrote: 
]
 Subject: Re: sccs2rcs to perl

 Well, I don't - at least, I wouldn't if I didn't have to because CVS
 depends on csh *only* because of the sccs2rcs csh script.  I'd love to
 remove csh from my system, but that would break dependencies (which is
 primarily why I re-wrote it in the first place).

I removed csh from almost all of my systems long ago.

I still have no interest in re-writing sccs2rcs into perl though  :-)

(I don't think I would ever use sccs2rcs.csh either -- I'd write my own
conversion tool in POSIX shell if I had to, even though it would be
trivial for me to either install csh again or find a machine where it is
still present and working)

 Ok, let me try another idea on you then.  Given the stunning lack of
 interest which, I admit certainly seems evident, how would you feel about
 removing the sccs2rcs script from the CVS distribution?  That'd make me
 just as happy.  All future CVS distribution gets smaller and you won't have
 to deal with any future bugs in the sccs2rcs script (which I see you had to
 patch a couple of times in the last year) -- everybody comes out a winner.

I wouldn't have any objection to that!  ;-)


-- 
Greg A. Woods

+1 416 218-0098;  [EMAIL PROTECTED];  [EMAIL PROTECTED];  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Planix, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED]; VE3TCP; Secrets of the Weird [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
Bug-cvs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-cvs



Re: sccs2rcs to perl

2002-03-07 Thread Greg A. Woods

[ On Thursday, March 7, 2002 at 18:06:22 (-0500), Michael Sterrett -Mr. Bones.- wrote: 
]
 Subject: Re: sccs2rcs to perl

 All the Linux distributions I have access too include sccs2rcs as part
 of the CVS package because it is distributed as part of the CVS tar ball.
 Because of that, I consider it part of CVS.

Unless you have SCCS files you wouldn't even know about it -- it's
hardly a part of CVS, especially since it's explicitly only included
in the contrib sub-directory.

 Sorry, but I disagree.  There are already a number of perl scripts in the
 contrib directory so the package as a whole depends on perl already.

That's also irrelevant.

You need to consider that the things in the contrib subdirectory are
individual stand-alone things -- not related to each other (well, there
are some that are related to each other, but most are completly
independent), and only minimally related to CVS (sccs2rcs is only
related very indirectly in that the RCS files it creates can be used by
CVS).

CVS itself, as a whole, does not depend on perl in any what whatsoever.

 I don't think you can argue that I've not reduced the number of
 dependencies for the CVS package.

The contrib things are not really a part of the CVS package -- they're
just a collection of things that were contributed but explicitly _not_
added to the package proper.

-- 
Greg A. Woods

+1 416 218-0098;  [EMAIL PROTECTED];  [EMAIL PROTECTED];  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Planix, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED]; VE3TCP; Secrets of the Weird [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
Bug-cvs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-cvs



Re: sccs2rcs to perl

2002-03-07 Thread Michael Sterrett -Mr. Bones.-

On Thu, 7 Mar 2002, Greg A. Woods wrote:

 I removed csh from almost all of my systems long ago.

Ah, I envy you. :-) I refuse to ignore the package dependencies on my
systems though...

 I still have no interest in re-writing sccs2rcs into perl though  :-)

Well, I did it for two reasons:

1. the package dependencies (which I guess you don't mind ;-))
2. I have a bunch of SCCS directories I need to convert to RCS and the
   csh version of the script is way too slow.

 (I don't think I would ever use sccs2rcs.csh either -- I'd write my own
 conversion tool in POSIX shell if I had to, even though it would be
 trivial for me to either install csh again or find a machine where it is
 still present and working)

Ah, someone who dislikes csh even more than I do.

Chop my suggestion that sccs2rcs be removed from the cvs distribution
 
 I wouldn't have any objection to that!  ;-)

Great!  Two votes for...

Michael Sterrett
  -Mr. Bones.-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


___
Bug-cvs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-cvs



Re: sccs2rcs to perl

2002-03-07 Thread Greg A. Woods

[ On Thursday, March 7, 2002 at 18:40:03 (-0500), Michael Sterrett -Mr. Bones.- wrote: 
]
 Subject: Re: sccs2rcs to perl

 2. I have a bunch of SCCS directories I need to convert to RCS and the
csh version of the script is way too slow.

Is?  was?  :-)

Why convert from SCCS?  I don't have any larger projects managed by
SCCS, but for all the small ones I have there's not much point to
changing over to RCS (or CVS) -- I just keep using SCCS  :-)

-- 
Greg A. Woods

+1 416 218-0098;  [EMAIL PROTECTED];  [EMAIL PROTECTED];  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Planix, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED]; VE3TCP; Secrets of the Weird [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
Bug-cvs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-cvs