Re: [bug-gnulib] [ADMIN] the bug-gnulib prefix

2005-06-06 Thread Bruno Haible
Stepan Kasal wrote:
 Let me remind you that if you want to filter the postings to
 a separate folder, and if you use procmail, you can use the

 following recipe:
 :0:

 * ^List-Post:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 bug-gnulib-new

You can also mark the mails in the subject line, without moving them
to a separate folder, like this:

# Subject rewriting: see http://www.uwasa.fi/~ts/info/proctips.html#subjid
:0
* ^List-Post: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]$
{ 
  :0 h
  SUBJECT=|formail -x Subject: 
  :0 fwh
  |formail -i Subject: [bug-gnulib]$SUBJECT
}


Thanks Stepan for the help on this.

Bruno



___
bug-gnulib mailing list
bug-gnulib@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnulib


Re: gcc -Wall warning for minmax.h

2005-06-06 Thread Derek Price
Bruno Haible wrote:

I blindly searched for m4_pushdef in the manual and didn't find
it. (May I suggest that these renamed m4_* macros be added to the manual's
index, one by one?)
  


Autoconf folks:

Would anyone mind if I committed a patch with @msindex entries for the
37 or so undocumented m4_* macros in the `Redefined M4 Macros' node of
doc/autoconf.texi?  I'm not bothering to include the patch in this email
because it is too simple but I don't want to waste the 15 minutes it
will take to write it without approval.  :)

Cheers,

Derek



___
bug-gnulib mailing list
bug-gnulib@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnulib


Re: gcc -Wall warning for minmax.h

2005-06-06 Thread Derek Price
Bruno Haible wrote:

But AS_TR_* is actually undocumented, right?
  


Yes, AS_TR_SH  AS_TR_CPP appear to be undocumented.  I've submitted a
patch to autoconf-patches to remedy this and will commit it within a few
days unless there are objections there.

Cheers,

Derek



___
bug-gnulib mailing list
bug-gnulib@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnulib


Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: findutils doesn't compile on sunos 4.1.4

2005-06-06 Thread Derek Price
Paul Eggert wrote:

I wouldn't object to minor and obvious tweaks that are checked out by
a real user who actually needs findutils to run on SunOS 4.1.4.  My
assumption in dropping support for SunOS 4.1.4 was partly predicated
on nobody really needing it any more (and computer museums don't count
as real needs :-).
  


What does this mean for Bruno's recent patch for stat  lstat which
removed the SunOS 4.1.4 support in addition to some other fixes?

Regards,

Derek



___
bug-gnulib mailing list
bug-gnulib@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnulib