[bug #42641] Use makeinfo --html to generate HTML manuals from .texi documents

[Fred Kiefer]

Update of bug #42641 (project gnustep):

  Status:None => Fixed  
 Open/Closed:Open => Closed 


___

Reply to this item at:

  

___
  Message sent via/by Savannah
  http://savannah.gnu.org/


___
Bug-gnustep mailing list
Bug-gnustep@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnustep

[bug #42641] Use makeinfo --html to generate HTML manuals from .texi documents

[Yavor Doganov]

Follow-up Comment #1, bug #42641 (project gnustep):

This bug can be closed as a stripped version of the proposed patch has been
applied (commit:d69117e).

___

Reply to this item at:

  

___
  Message sent via/by Savannah
  http://savannah.gnu.org/


___
Bug-gnustep mailing list
Bug-gnustep@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnustep

[bug #42641] Use makeinfo --html to generate HTML manuals from .texi documents

[Yavor Doganov]

URL:
  http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?42641

 Summary: Use makeinfo --html to generate HTML manuals from
.texi documents
 Project: GNUstep
Submitted by: yavor
Submitted on: Sun 29 Jun 2014 07:08:06 PM EEST
Category: Makefiles
Severity: 3 - Normal
  Item Group: Change Request
  Status: None
 Privacy: Public
 Assigned to: None
 Open/Closed: Open
 Discussion Lock: Any

___

Details:

I propose to switch to makeinfo for producing HTML variants of the Texinfo
manuals.  Rationale:

* texi2html is no longer developed
* the main texi2html author has been working on texinfo since quite some time
and the general advice is to migrate to texinfo (see [1])
* modern texinfo implements (almost) all the texi2html features
* texi2html is likely to be removed from some distros in the not-so-distant
future (see [2])
* makeinfo is more likely to be installed on a system
* one dependency less is generally a good thing

Cons: As makeinfo is more strict than texi2html, some documents which
previously built with texi2html will fail with makeinfo --html, just like they
are currently failing when building the .info file(s).  Since gnustep-make by
design ignores such errors, they are not fatal.  But I don't think that
documents with invalid Texinfo syntax are a valid reason to stick with
texi2html; they should be fixed instead.

[1] http://www.nongnu.org/texi2html/
[2] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2013/05/msg01516.html

Please find attached the proposed patch implementing the switch.  texi2html as
a possibility is retained and can be used if required by the user.  I have
tested all four combinations (makeinfo/texi2html/split/monolithic) for the
common targets all/clean/install/uninstall.



___

File Attachments:


---
Date: Sun 29 Jun 2014 07:08:06 PM EEST  Name: makeinfo-html.patch  Size: 6kB  
By: yavor

http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/download.php?file_id=31632

___

Reply to this item at:

  http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?42641

___
  Message sent via/by Savannah
  http://savannah.gnu.org/


___
Bug-gnustep mailing list
Bug-gnustep@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnustep