[±¤°í]¾î´úÆ®ºñµð¿À ÆÄÆ®³Ê¸ðÁý!!ÇÏÀ§2´Ü°è Ä¿¹Ì¼ÇÁö±Þ

2001-10-05 Thread µµÄì¼½½º 
Title: ±¹³»¸ôÄ«/È­»óÄ·/porno¼½½º°­ÁÂ/K¾ç ÈÉÃ帱⠵î







±¹³»¸ôÄ«/È­»óÄ·/porno¼½½º°­ÁÂ/K¾ç 
ÈÉÃ帱⠵î
[±¹³» ¼ºÀΰ¡ÀÔ·ü1À§]¸¦ ÀÚ¶ûÇÏ´Â ¾î´úÆ® ºñµð¿À¿¡¼­
°¡ÀÔÀü ȸ¿ø´Ô²² Ưº° ¼±¹°À̺¥Æ®¸¦ 
¸¶·ÃÇß½À´Ï´Ù.
Çѱºµ¥ °¡ÀÔÀ¸·Î avkorea  ¿Í avjapan  µÎ°÷¸ðµÎ °¨»óÇϽǼö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.
1°³¿ù  (18,000¿ø)
2°³¿ù  (29.000¿ø +Æ丣¸ó 
Çâ¼ö °øÂ¥[½ÃÁß°¡ 28000])
4°³¿ù  (56.000¿ø +Å°½º °øÂ¥)
6°³¿ù  (78.000¿ø +Åä³¢+ ·¯ºêÁ© °øÂ¥) 
9°³¿ù  (125.000¿ø 
+ĸƾ °øÂ¥[½ÃÁß°¡ 12])
12°³¿ù(140.000¿ø +°­·Â·¯ºêµ¹ + ·¯ºêÁ© °øÂ¥[½ÃÁß°¡ 
14])
    

ÆÄÆ®³Ê ¸ðÁý!! ÇÏÀ§2´Ü°è Ä¿¹Ì¼ÇÁö±Þ!!¹è³Ê¸µÅ©·Î 
¶¼µ· ¹ö¼¼¿ä.
¼ö½Å°ÅºÎ
 
 




___
Bug-guile mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guile

¡á ´©±¸³ª °¡´ÉÇÕ´Ï´Ù!

2001-10-05 Thread Rin 










¸ÕÀú,
  ½ºÆÔ°ü·Ã ¸ÞÀÏÀ̶ó°í ¿ÀÇØÇÏ½Ç °Í °°¾Æ ±¦ÂúÀº »çÀÌÆ®¸¦ ¾Ë·Áµå¸³´Ï´Ù.¡á http://ezguide.wo.to ¡á¹ÂÁ÷°ü·ÃÁ¤º¸, ÀÎÅÍ³Ý Á¤º¸ µî ´Ù¾çÇÑ
  Á¤º¸¸¦ º¸¿©ÁÖ´Â 'EZ-GUIDE'ÀÔ´Ï´Ù.À¥ ¼­ÇÎ ÇϽø鼭 ¶ç¾î³õÀ¸½Ã¸é ±¦Âú°Ú´Ù ½Í¾î¼­ ¾Ë·Áµå¸³´Ï´Ù.±ÍÇÏ¿¡°Ô À¯¿ëÇÑ Á¤º¸¿´À¸¸é
  ÇÏ´Â ¸¶À½
  °£ÀýÇÕ´Ï´Ù.


  ÀÏ´Ü, ÀÌ ¸ÞÀÏÀº #Çѹø¸¸# ¹ß¼ÛÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÓÀ» ¾Ë·Áµå¸³´Ï´Ù.¿øÄ¡ ¾ÊÀ¸¼Ì´Ù¸é Áø½ÉÀ¸·Î »ç°úµå¸³´Ï´Ù. Á¤¸»
  Á˼ÛÇÕ´Ï´Ù.±ÍÇÏÀÇ ¸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò´Â ÀÎÅÍ³Ý ¼­ÇÎÀ» ÇÏ´Ù°¡ ¿ì¿¬È÷ ¾Ë°Ô µÇ¾ú½À´Ï´Ù.ÀúÈñ´Â ±ÍÇÏ¿¡ ´ëÇØ ¾î¶°ÇÑ Á¤º¸µµ °¡Áö°í ÀÖÁö
  ¾Ê½À´Ï´Ù. ¾È½ÉÇϽʽÿÀ.¶ÇÇÑ ±ÍÇÏ¿¡°Ô ¾Æ¹«·± ÇÇÇظ¦ ÁÖÁö ¾Ê½À´Ï´Ù, ¸Í¼¼ÇÕ´Ï´Ù.
  ¡Ü http://flashgetmoney.wo.to
  ¡Ü   ¶Ç´Â...¡Ü http://speedgetmoney.wo.to ¡Ü
  À§ »çÀÌÆ®¸¦ º¹»çÇϽŠµÚ ÀÎÅÍ³Ý ÀͽºÇ÷η¯ ÁÖ¼Òâ¿¡ ºÙ¿©³Ö±â ÇÏ½Ã°í ¿£ÅÍÇϽʽÿÀ.±ÍÇÏ°¡ ÀÌ »çÀÌÆ®¸¦ ¸¸³ª°Ô µÈ °ÍÀº Á¤¸»
  Çà¿îÀÏ °ÍÀÔ´Ï´Ù.´©±¸³ª ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. Àú´Â 100% Àå´ãÇÕ´Ï´Ù.
  ºÒ¹ý Àý´ë ¾Æ´Õ´Ï´Ù. ´ë±â¾÷ »ï¼º°ú Á¦ÈÞÇÏ°í BMƯÇãÃâ¿ø±îÁö ³½ »çÀÌÆ®ÀÔ´Ï´Ù.°ÅÁþ¸»À̶ó¸é ÀÌ·± °ÍÀ» ¾Ë·Áµå¸®Áö
  ¾Ê½À´Ï´Ù.À§ »çÀÌÆ®¿¡ µé¾î°¡½Å ´ÙÀ½¿¡ ¾Æ´Ï¶ó°í »ý°¢µÇ½Ã¸é ¹Ù·Î ³ª¿À½Ã¸é µÇ°ÚÁÒ?¾Æ¿¹ Á¢¼ÓÇÏÁö ¾ÊÀ¸¼Åµµ ÁÁ½À´Ï´Ù. ±×°Ç
  ±ÍÇÏÀÇ ÆÇ´Ü¿¡ ´Þ·ÈÀ¸´Ï±î¿ä.
  ÀÌ ¸ÞÀÏÀ» ¼ö½Å°ÅºÎ ÇÏ°í ½ÍÀ¸½Ã¸é ²À [EMAIL PROTECTED]À¸·Î ¸ÞÀÏÁÖ½Ã¸é °¨»çÇÏ°Ú½À´Ï´Ù.Ȥ½Ã
  ¸ÞÀÏÀÌ µÎ¼¼Å뾿 Áߺ¹µÇ¾î °¡½Å ºÐÀÌ °è½Ã´Ù¸é Á¤¸» »ç°úµå¸³´Ï´Ù.¼­¹ö¿À·ù·Î ±×·¸°Ô µÉ ¼ö°¡ Àֱ⠶§¹®ÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
  =ÀоîÁּż­
  °¨»çÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ±ÍÇÏ¿¡°Ô ¾ðÁ¦³ª ÁÁÀº ÀÏ ÀϾ±æ
  ¹Ù¶ø´Ï´Ù=




___
Bug-guile mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guile

Re: Tcl War link

2001-10-05 Thread Thien-Thi Nguyen 

   From: Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   Date: 05 Oct 2001 19:32:23 +0100

   Opinions?

i'm in favor of dropping the link -- anyone who wants to maintain that
kind of thing should consider putting on the guile wiki:

 http://www.glug.org/docbits/index.html#guile-wiki

thi

___
Bug-guile mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guile

Re: Threads

2001-10-05 Thread Neil Jerram 

> "Gary" == Gary Houston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

>> Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2001 01:02:30 -0700 From: Thien-Thi Nguyen
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> 
>> From: Gary Houston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: 29 Sep 2001
>> 21:13:35 -
>> 
>> It seems to work OK in Guile 1.3.4.
>> 
>> data point: works w/ 1.5.2 (i686-pc-linux-gnu).

Gary> I get the same behaviour with 1.4 and 1.7 CVS:

Gary> Run the script once and it works.  Run it again and it locks
Gary> up.  Reboot and repeat...

Sounds like a 1.6 ship-stopping bug to me.  Does anyone disagree?

Neil


___
Bug-guile mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guile

Re: Tcl War link

2001-10-05 Thread Neil Jerram 

> "Golubev" == Golubev I N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

Golubev>  in
Golubev> `guile-tut.texi' are non-existent currently.

Well we can probably find some replacement URLs, but I think the wider
question is whether we still want to preserve this tired old history
in the Guile tutorial?

Opinions?

Neil


___
Bug-guile mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guile

Re: guile.info: Procedures for On the Fly Evaluation

2001-10-05 Thread Neil Jerram 

> "Alex" == Alex Schroeder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

Alex> Thien-Thi Nguyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> i believe this bug is actually a misunderstanding.  [...]
guile> read-and-eval!
>> #
guile> (version)
>> "1.5.2"
guile>
>>

Alex> Hm.  Maybe when I built Guile something got left out?

Alex> Alex.

guile> read-and-eval!
Alex> : In expression read-and-eval!:  (version)
Alex> "1.7.0"

You're quite right - read-and-eval! has now been removed from
development CVS.  I'll remove the corresponding manual entry.

Thanks!
Neil


___
Bug-guile mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guile

Re: ice-9 scrdir!=builddir

2001-10-05 Thread Thien-Thi Nguyen 

   From: "Golubev I. N." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2001 16:47:29 (GMT)

   Yes, if `and-let-star-compat.scm' never ever will be generated in
   build time (so that right version of it will appear in build dir).

from looking at the makefiles, i could not infer when (if ever)
and-let-star-compat.scm would be generated, and so i've gone ahead and
made the small change.  thanks for the report!

thi

___
Bug-guile mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guile

Re: ice-9 scrdir!=builddir

2001-10-05 Thread Golubev I. N. 

Yes, if `and-let-star-compat.scm' never ever will be generated in
build time (so that right version of it will appear in build dir).

___
Bug-guile mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guile

Re: ice-9 scrdir!=builddir

2001-10-05 Thread Thien-Thi Nguyen 

is the following change sufficient?

-   -$(INSTALL_DATA) and-let-star-compat.scm \
+   -$(INSTALL_DATA) $(srcdir)/and-let-star-compat.scm \

thi

___
Bug-guile mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guile

Re: ice-9 scrdir!=builddir

2001-10-05 Thread Golubev I. N. 

Installation program does not find `and-let-star-compat.scm' in
current (= build) directory and `and-let*.scm' does not get installed.

___
Bug-guile mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guile

Re: ice-9 scrdir!=builddir

2001-10-05 Thread Thien-Thi Nguyen 

   From: "Golubev I. N." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2001 16:25:07 (GMT)

   To get 'and-let*.scm' installed correctly when source directory is
   not the same as build one, I copied commands from `Makefile.in' in
   `Makefile.am'.

what behavior do you see w/o this patch?

thi

___
Bug-guile mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guile

Re: guile.info: Writing

2001-10-05 Thread Thien-Thi Nguyen 

   From: Martin Grabmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2001 17:20:14 +0200 (MEST)

   I'm not sure, but I think Alex was talking about the `R5RS Index'
   node in the GRM.

of course!  sorry for the brain fade...

i've added a "display" entry to the node "Writing" (both branches).  the
entry is included in "R5RS Index".  thanks for the clarification, and
thanks, Alex, for the suggestion.

thi

___
Bug-guile mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guile

Tcl War link

2001-10-05 Thread Golubev I. N. 

 in `guile-tut.texi' are
non-existent currently.

___
Bug-guile mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guile

Re: guile.info: Writing

2001-10-05 Thread Martin Grabmueller 

> From: Thien-Thi Nguyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2001 20:53:05 -0700
> 
>From: Alex Schroeder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 12:10:45 +0200
> 
>I just wanted some details on "display" but it was not in the R5RS
>Index.  The node "Writing" has info on "newline".  I think "display"
>should be added to that node as well and an appropriate index entry
>should be available.
> 
> we have different r5rs.info files, apparently.  here, the index shows
> both "display" and "newline" in "output".

I'm not sure, but I think Alex was talking about the `R5RS Index' node
in the GRM.

'martin

___
Bug-guile mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guile

Re: Top-Level Debug/Backtrace Bug

2001-10-05 Thread Martin Grabmueller 

> From: "Crowder, Brian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2001 16:48:56 -0700
> 
> It seems like erroneous code at the top-level of an .scm file fails to yield
> filenames and line-numbers for backtrace/error display.  For example:
> 
> echo error here > test.scm
> guile --debug -l test.scm
> 
> Yields something like
> 
> Backtrace:
> In unknown file:
>?: 0* [primitive-load "test.scm"]
>?: 1* here
> 
> : In expression here:
> : Unbound variable: here

The reason is that the Guile reader only records source positions for
cons cells.  That means that a symbol like `here' will not have any
source location attached, whereas a quotation like `'here' will.

HTH,
  'martin

___
Bug-guile mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guile

Re: -c 0

2001-10-05 Thread Golubev I. N. 

> do you still see this w/ guile-1.5.4?

No.  (I did not download the tarball, used branch_release-1-6 from
cvs).

___
Bug-guile mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guile

Re: -c 0

2001-10-05 Thread Golubev I. N. 

> do you still see this w/ guile-1.5.4?

No.  (I did not download the tarball, used branch_release-1-6 from
cvs).

___
Bug-guile mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guile