Re: [doc:ref] clearer

2002-01-06 Thread Thien-Thi Nguyen

   From: fabrice bauzac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2002 11:00:25 +0100

   Hey, where should that information go then?  All the information
   about scm_boot_guile is located there!  I had to browse Guile's
   sources in order to see the argument order.

docs are improving steadily still; your local copy may be out of date.
i took a look through:

 http://www.glug.org/docbits/guile-doc-out/html/guile-1.7.0/

and although the organization is somewhat confusing, the information you
seek seems to be in section 5.3.1 (Guile Initialization Functions).

thi

___
Bug-guile mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guile



Re: [doc:ref] clearer

2002-01-06 Thread fabrice bauzac

On Sat, Jan 05, 2002 at 11:46:25PM -0800, Thien-Thi Nguyen wrote:
>From: Fabrice Bauzac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Let's make that sentence clearer:

> because this is the intro, i think it's ok to leave out details like
> call-argument order.

Hey, where should that information go then?  All the information about
scm_boot_guile is located there!  I had to browse Guile's sources in
order to see the argument order.

-- 
fabrice bauzac
I use free software.  If there's something I don't like in it, I can
change it myself or pay someone to do it.  If my friends want it, I
can give them; and they will have the same rights.
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/why-free.html

___
Bug-guile mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guile



Re: [doc:ref] clearer

2002-01-05 Thread Thien-Thi Nguyen

   From: Fabrice Bauzac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2002 14:14:36 +0100

   Let's make that sentence clearer:

because this is the intro, i think it's ok to leave out details like
call-argument order.

thi

___
Bug-guile mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guile