Re: awk portability

[Marius Vollmer]

Golubev I. N. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 But why do not I see this change neither in snapshot in
 ftp://ftp.red-bean.com/pub/guile/snapshots/guile-core-20010514.tar.gz
 nor in `:pserver:anoncvs@source{ware.cygnus,s.redhat}.com:/cvs/guile'
 (which snapshot seems to be derived from)?

These are outdated places.  Please go to

http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/guile

for uptodate information.  Guile moved around a bit recently...

___
Bug-guile mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guile

Re: awk portability

[Golubev I. N.]

 We already have a fix for SCO nawk in CVS.  Does it help?

Yes, revision 1.2 of
`guile/guile-core/libguile/guile-func-name-check.in' from
subversions.gnu.org helps with sco awk.

But why do not I see this change neither in snapshot in
ftp://ftp.red-bean.com/pub/guile/snapshots/guile-core-20010514.tar.gz
nor in `:pserver:anoncvs@source{ware.cygnus,s.redhat}.com:/cvs/guile'
(which snapshot seems to be derived from)?

What are replication rules for guile cvs repositories in
subversions.gnu.org and sources.redhat.com?

___
Bug-guile mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guile

Re: awk portability

[Golubev I. N.]

 I would like it if they could be replaced with Guile programs, even
 if that means a slightly more contorted build procedure.

It is just another wording of what I wrote on Wed, 16 May 2001
13:30:44 in [EMAIL PROTECTED].  Why do not just follow
GNU coding standards and write things like this in universally
portable sed?

___
Bug-guile mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guile

Re: awk portability

[Michael Livshin]

Marius Vollmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Golubev I. N. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
  To allow guile work with native awk it needs at least one patch.
 
 We already have a fix for SCO nawk in CVS.  Does it help?

might not, if the version of SCO is different, or something.

and I just tested building Guile on an HP, and guess what -- the
native awk doesn't like the snarfer at all.

looks like the awk script should be replaced as soon as possible...

-- 
You know better than to trust a strange computer.


___
Bug-guile mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guile

Re: awk portability

[Marius Vollmer]

Golubev I. N. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 To allow guile work with native awk it needs at least one patch.

We already have a fix for SCO nawk in CVS.  Does it help?

2000-10-02  Michael Livshin  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

* guile-func-name-check.in: now should not confuse SCO nawk
anymore.  thanks to Bruce Korb for the fix!

___
Bug-guile mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guile