Re: string-index defined twice?

2001-11-27 Thread Marius Vollmer

Chris Cramer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 On Sun, Nov 25, 2001 at 05:51:23PM -0500, Eric Gillespie, Jr. wrote:
  guile (string-index /path/to/blah #\/ 1)
  ERROR: In expression (string-index /path/to/blah #\/ ...):
  ERROR: Wrong number of arguments to #procedure string-index (str a-char)
  ABORT: (wrong-number-of-args)
  
  Type (backtrace) to get more information or (debug) to enter the debugger.
  
  This happens with both Guile 1.4 and 1.5.4.  I found the
  redefinition of string-index in ice-9/format.scm.  Which
  definition is correct?  Can this be fixed before 1.6?
 
 It looks like the string-index in format.scm should be removed. It's
 probably just left over from SLIB.

Yes, and it isn't even _used_ by format.scm.  But the string-index
from format.scm is probably not the problem here since it is not
exported from (ice-9 format).

___
Bug-guile mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guile



Re: string-index defined twice?

2001-11-27 Thread Eric Gillespie, Jr.

Marius Vollmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 string-index from format.scm is probably not the problem
 here since it is not exported from (ice-9 format).

OK, so what is it?  That's the only other sting-index i could
find.

-- 
Eric Gillespie, Jr. * [EMAIL PROTECTED]

I wish people didn't exist.


___
Bug-guile mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guile



Re: string-index defined twice?

2001-11-25 Thread Chris Cramer

On Sun, Nov 25, 2001 at 05:51:23PM -0500, Eric Gillespie, Jr. wrote:
 guile (string-index /path/to/blah #\/ 1)
 ERROR: In expression (string-index /path/to/blah #\/ ...):
 ERROR: Wrong number of arguments to #procedure string-index (str a-char)
 ABORT: (wrong-number-of-args)
 
 Type (backtrace) to get more information or (debug) to enter the debugger.
 
 This happens with both Guile 1.4 and 1.5.4.  I found the
 redefinition of string-index in ice-9/format.scm.  Which
 definition is correct?  Can this be fixed before 1.6?

It looks like the string-index in format.scm should be removed. It's
probably just left over from SLIB.

-- 
C. Ray C. aka Christopher Cramer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pyro.net/~crayc/

___
Bug-guile mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guile