Re: missing doc for substring-move!

[Marius Vollmer]

Neil Jerram [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 What should we do here?  Is there a reason at all for keeping the
 -left and -right procedures?

I can't see any.  Away with them!  (I'll do that.)

___
Bug-guile mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guile

Re: missing doc for substring-move!

[Neil Jerram]

 Scott == Scott Lenser [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Scott The documentation for substring-move!,
Scott substring-move-left!, and substring-move-right! never says
Scott what substring-move! does.

Hmm, yes.  That's because it's all rather bogus, I'm afraid.

As far as I can tell, substring-move!, substring-move-left! and
substring-move-right! are all identical and share the same
implementation, which uses memmove.

What should we do here?  Is there a reason at all for keeping the
-left and -right procedures?

Neil


___
Bug-guile mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guile

missing doc for substring-move!

[Scott Lenser]

The documentation for substring-move!, substring-move-left!, and 
substring-move-right! never says what substring-move! does.



___
Bug-guile mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guile