bug#63267: gcc-toolchain is missing libstdc++.so
Hi everyone, Apologies for the long delay on this. On Tue, May 09, 2023 at 07:07 PM, Simon Tournier wrote: > Hi, > > I am proposing patch#63393 [1] which adds the output lib to > gcc-toolchain. Well, quoting the comment: > > ;; The main raison d'être of this "meta-package" is (1) to conveniently > ;; install everything that we need, and (2) to make sure ld-wrapper > comes > ;; before Binutils' ld in the user's profile. > > I think, this package gcc-toolchain should be the visible package and > battery included. > > WDYT? > > 1: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/63393 > > Cheers, > simon I've just pushed, as b47ae1ecc43baaf726701ab2d2f810ecfaa75428, the patches from that issue (the first from simon, the second my simplified one just adding gcc:lib to gcc-toolchain). This should fix the original bug here, so I am closing. However, it was raised here and in 63393 about alternatives in how we use gcc-toolchain outputs. As well as the issue I ran into about make-libstdc++. So, if anyone would like to change anything from the new status quo, please open a new issue. At least now we are working from a better default I would say, with gcc-toolchain including the libraries from gcc:lib. Thanks all, John
bug#65111: GnuCash cannot get online quotes
Hello there … im using GNUCASH 5.3 and have the same problem exactly … can you advise on what to do now?
bug#70429: agate service broken
Hello, I recently updated a server system which hadn't been updated for a long time, and my agate service is now broken. I will try below to include all the relevant data: * Service fails to start. Herd does not give a reason for the failure when I do this manually. * agate.log shows this error message: > 2024-04-16 13:35:52 Unrecognized option: 'cert' * Here is the service configuration I am using: ``` guile scheme (service agate-service-type (agate-configuration (content "/srv/gemini") (cert "/srv/gemini-tls/cert.pem") (key "/srv/gemini-tls/key.rsa") (log-ip? #f))) ``` * The working system generation: > Generation 24 Aug 07 2023 22:24:43 > file name: /var/guix/profiles/system-24-link > canonical file name: /gnu/store/nq8bmbmr4wa7q7pndaxfkxi8qrzna4gs-system > label: GNU with Linux-Libre 6.3.13 > bootloader: grub > root device: UUID: ce7cdde8-a12b-4f1d-a605-d55aa31f92fd > kernel: > /gnu/store/224j20diq0qgxqzmh1hgsp35zi3qn9jc-linux-libre-6.3.13/bzImage > channels: > guix: > repository URL: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git > branch: master > commit: d43b53c476b4e9322b31274b788e851d37e72302 > configuration file: > /gnu/store/0c11jz30v8mkzqk0gzd93abp7z6x0637-configuration.scm * The failing system generation > Generation 25 Apr 16 2024 13:26:31(current) > file name: /var/guix/profiles/system-25-link > canonical file name: /gnu/store/4wng095zf7j26pmr3hkq2pcbw3hjs6ai-system > label: GNU with Linux-Libre 6.8.5 > bootloader: grub > root device: UUID: ce7cdde8-a12b-4f1d-a605-d55aa31f92fd > kernel: > /gnu/store/4f7nszk7znn8knhs17c7hl1nyklx7s4s-linux-libre-6.8.5/bzImage > channels: > guix: > repository URL: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git > branch: master > commit: a8353e9d6b34fd8d42d2e8f14ce844849fe9c293 > configuration file: > /gnu/store/0rd73nfs8gvdadp6ja65779v2h8yx3kg-configuration.scm * My system information: ``` christopher@galadriel ~$ neofetch --stdout christopher@galadriel - OS: Guix System x86_64 Host: OptiPlex 7010 01 Kernel: 6.8.5-gnu Uptime: 1 hour, 25 mins Packages: 59 (guix-system), 38 (guix-user) Shell: bash 5.1.16 Terminal: /dev/pts/0 CPU: Intel i5-3570 (4) @ 3.800GHz GPU: Intel HD Graphics Memory: 437MiB / 15923MiB ``` -- Christopher Howard gemini://gem.librehacker.com http://gem.librehacker.com בראשית ברא אלהים את השמים ואת הארץ
bug#70278: udevd[87]: specified group 'sgx' unknown
Hi, Liliana Marie Prikler skribis: > Am Donnerstag, dem 11.04.2024 um 09:58 +0200 schrieb Ludovic Courtès: >> Ludovic Courtès skribis: >> >> > Since the recent ‘gnome-team’ merge, we get this message at boot >> > time: >> > >> > udevd[87]: specified group 'sgx' unknown >> > >> > Should we add ‘sgx’ to ‘%base-groups’? (What is it for?) >> >> Cc’ing Vivien & Liliana who might know more about this. > This seems related to Intel's Software Guard eXtensions, or, as we in > the free world like to call them Security paper Generator eXtensions. :-) > As far as I'm aware, these ought to be disabled anyway, and we might > want to drop the offending lines. According to [1], there's only two > of them anyway. [...] > [1] https://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/ticket/5265 Sounds good. (My intuition would have been to create the ‘sgx’ group to placate udev, but removing those lines may be even better.) Can you look into it? Thanks, Ludo’.
