bug#70774: Close this bug plz

2024-05-04 Thread jbranso--- via Bug reports for GNU Guix
This bug is done son!





bug#70774: Fwd: The Artanis pkg issue

2024-05-04 Thread jbranso--- via Bug reports for GNU Guix
May 4, 2024 at 3:33 PM, "jbranso--- via Bug reports for GNU Guix" 
 wrote:



> 
> Apologies for top posting...The below email seemed more like a bug.
> 
> Typically guix-devel is for making "large" or complicated changes to guix.
> 
> I'm forwarding your message over to bug-guix@gnu.org. 
> 
> Also, do you use Artanis? I've tried to get it to work a few times...
> 
> and I can never quite figure it out. My guile web framework is...
> 
> guile haunt at the moment. :)
> 
> Joshua 

Per this message, it looks like this bug is done!

https://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2024-05/msg00033.html

I'm closing this bug.

Joshua

> 
>  Forwarded message ---
> 
> From: "Nala Ginrut" 
> 
> To: guix-de...@gnu.org
> 
> Sent: May 4, 2024 at 11:36 AM
> 
> Subject: The Artanis pkg issue
> 
> Dear Guix folks, I saw the lines in Artanis pkg info:
> 
> -cut-
> 
>  (delete-file-recursively "artanis/third-party/json.scm")
> 
>  (delete-file-recursively "artanis/third-party/json")
> 
>  (delete-file-recursively "artanis/third-party/redis.scm")
> 
>  (delete-file-recursively "artanis/third-party/redis")
> 
> -end--
> 
> I understand these lines are aiming to unbundle guile-json and guile-redis, 
> however, recently I've unbundled them in vanilla Artanis. So there's 
> something changed. 
> 
> You may need to keep third-party/json.scm and third-party/edis.scm in the 
> next release since they are the wrappers, and it's possible to make further 
> abstracts then. In addition, there are necessary renaming operations for 
> compatibility.
> 
> Best regards.
>





bug#70774: Fwd: The Artanis pkg issue

2024-05-04 Thread jbranso--- via Bug reports for GNU Guix
Apologies for top posting...The below email seemed more like a bug.

Typically guix-devel is for making "large" or complicated changes to guix.

I'm forwarding your message over to bug-guix@gnu.org.  

Also, do you use Artanis?  I've tried to get it to work a few times...
and I can never quite figure it out.  My guile web framework is...
guile haunt at the moment.  :)

Joshua 


 Forwarded message ---



From: "Nala Ginrut" 


To: guix-de...@gnu.org


Sent: May 4, 2024 at 11:36 AM


Subject: The Artanis pkg issue



Dear Guix folks, I saw the lines in Artanis pkg info:

-cut-

 (delete-file-recursively "artanis/third-party/json.scm")


 (delete-file-recursively "artanis/third-party/json")


 (delete-file-recursively "artanis/third-party/redis.scm")


 (delete-file-recursively "artanis/third-party/redis")

-end--


I understand these lines are aiming to unbundle guile-json and guile-redis, 
however, recently I've unbundled them in vanilla Artanis. So there's something 
changed. 


You may need to keep third-party/json.scm and third-party/edis.scm in the next 
release since they are the wrappers, and it's possible to make further 
abstracts then. In addition, there are necessary renaming operations for 
compatibility.


Best regards.





bug#70771: GUIX pull fails to build guix derivation

2024-05-04 Thread Marcel van der Boom



Copied output as suggested below

 guix  https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git   aa9ac25
substitute: updating substitutes from 
'https://bordeaux.guix.gnu.org'... 100.0%
substitute: updating substitutes from 
'https://bordeaux.guix.gnu.org'... 100.0%
substitute: updating substitutes from 'https://ci.guix.gnu.org'... 
100.0%
substitute: updating substitutes from 
'https://bordeaux.guix.gnu.org'... 100.0%
substitute: updating substitutes from 'https://ci.guix.gnu.org'... 
100.0%
substitute: updating substitutes from 
'https://bordeaux.guix.gnu.org'... 100.0%
building 
/gnu/store/0qcd9hmrjf08rh4ym5vwkprli4dzryjh-guile-git-0.7.0.drv...
building 
/gnu/store/0ygd9p76xw64xrzq4m527f6m0va1ilvq-nss-3.99.0.drv...

The following build is still in progress:
 /gnu/store/0ygd9p76xw64xrzq4m527f6m0va1ilvq-nss-3.99.0.drv

building 
/gnu/store/mbn9c0nrds9lsph3wk9izrydzimny4q1-guix-daemon-1.4.0-18.4c94b9e.drv...

The following build is still in progress:
 /gnu/store/0ygd9p76xw64xrzq4m527f6m0va1ilvq-nss-3.99.0.drv

| 'check' phasebuild-log 3160471 101
[   OK ] Pkcs11ModuleTest.ListSlots (0 ms)
[ RUN  ] Pkcs11ModuleTest.PublicCertificatesToken
- 'check' phasebuild-log 3160471 101
[   OK ] Pkcs11ModuleTest.ListSlots (0 ms)
[ RUN  ] Pkcs11ModuleTest.PublicCertificatesToken
\ 'check' phaseBacktrace:
 14 (primitive-load 
 "/gnu/store/b57d9jzzr4nrpjzgg95j063pkkxkp1a3-compute-guix-derivation")

In ice-9/eval.scm:
   155:9 13 (_ _)
   159:9 12 (_ #(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#   (guile-u?> ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?))

In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
   152:2 11 (with-fluid* _ _ _)
   152:2 10 (with-fluid* _ _ _)
In ./guix/store.scm:
 2182:24  9 (run-with-store # 3f93b693a0a0> # 
 ?)

  2010:8  8 (_ #)
In ./guix/gexp.scm:
  299:22  7 (_ #)
  1205:2  6 (_ #)
  1072:2  5 (_ #)
   913:4  4 (_ #)
In ./guix/store.scm:
 2067:12  3 (_ #)
  1405:5  2 (map/accumulate-builds #  3f93b693a0a0> # ?)
 1421:15  1 (_ # 
 ("/gnu/store/mbn9c0nrds9lsph3wk9izrydzimny4q1-guix-daemo?" ?) ?)

 1421:15  0 (loop #f)

./guix/store.scm:1421:15: In procedure loop:
ERROR:
 1. :
 message: "build of 
 `/gnu/store/0ygd9p76xw64xrzq4m527f6m0va1ilvq-nss-3.99.0.drv' 
 failed"

 status: 100
guix pull: error: You found a bug: the program 
'/gnu/store/b57d9jzzr4nrpjzgg95j063pkkxkp1a3-compute-guix-derivation'
failed to compute the derivation for Guix (version: 
"aa9ac252206615713ab988d7068da9e14a9bccc0"; system: 
"powerpc64le-linux";
host version: "e5c130c0f90a7dacc8d223eee494a1b1105dd94a"; 
pull-version: 1).



--
Marcel van der Boom → mar...@van-der-boom.nl





bug#25235: [Maxim Cournoyer] bug#25235: [PATCH v3 1/1] build-system/pyproject: Do not wrap native-inputs.

2024-05-04 Thread Lars-Dominik Braun
Hi,

> I'm advancing with my patch series, which I can submit soon. I was
> curious about why this 25235 patch isn't in python-team branch yet since
> it's also a very welcome change to the pyproject-build-system.

I believe this change is based on #60847, which Ludo objected to
(https://issues.guix.gnu.org/60847#19-lineno32). Thus it cannot be merged.

Lars