bug#41116: Guix deploy fails with new version of Herd

2020-05-07 Thread Alex Sassmannshausen via Bug reports for GNU Guix
Hi Marius,

Marius Bakke  writes:

> Hi Alex,
>
> [...]
>
> This issue has been reported by a number of users on IRC.  I think the
> problem is that the the #:file-creation-mask keyword requires support
> from the running Shepherd, which may not have it yet.  I think we should
> revert commit 4c0cc7bed3de2c0e2d3a6e95b88693941e839eec until we find a
> smooth upgrade path.  Can you try it and push if that fixes guix deploy?

I believe Ludovic has now done this.  I will test and close this bug
if it is now working.

Cheers,

Alex





bug#41116: A naive proposal for a solution

2020-05-06 Thread Alex Sassmannshausen via Bug reports for GNU Guix
Upon thinking further about this it seems to me the problem is caused by
guix deploy attempting to restart services as well as it can during
deployment.  When this fails deployment fails.

guix system reconfigure on the other hand does not do this (afaik).  As
a result it can complete.

Once reconfigure is completed a reboot switches to the new system
version and is then thus able to restart the services.

If all this is correct, then the long-discussed guix deploy feature of
service restart policies would resolve this issue elegantly:
When a similar herd upgrade in future looms, a switch away from "restart
running services" to "no restart services" or "reboot after deployment"
would avoid this currently hard-coded failure mode.

Food for thought perhaps, if my understanding is anywhere close to
right, that is.

Alex






bug#41116: Guix deploy fails with new version of Herd

2020-05-06 Thread Alex Sassmannshausen via Bug reports for GNU Guix
Hello,

I maintain a number of servers using Guix deploy.  It seems that the
recent upgrade to Herd in Guix, and specifically commit
4c0cc7bed3de2c0e2d3a6e95b88693941e839eec might have introduced a bug.

>From my testing, guix deploy currently consistently fails with:
-8<->8---
ice-9/boot-9.scm:1667:16: In procedure raise-exception:
ERROR:
  1. &inferior-exception:
  arguments: (srfi-34 #" "Unrecognized keyword" () (#:file-creation-mask))] 
7eff2bd7be00>>)
  inferior: #f
  stack: ()
-8<->8---

A workaround is to build the system configuration locally on the target
server, then to reconfigure.  It will still error at the same place, but
at this point, after restarting the server, the new version of Herd will
be running and both deploy and reconfigure will work.

I don't know what a good solution to this could be, but it may be
something we need to consider in future development of Herd.

Best wishes,

Alex