bug#55361: [Installer] Extra unprivileged “root” account added

[Ludovic Courtès]

The installer built from:

--8<---cut here---start->8---
Generation 214  May 02 2022 21:44:14(current)
  guix 6b588da
repository URL: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git
branch: master
commit: 6b588da368c77cde82ea2f22ca315116228777ad
--8<---cut here---end--->8---

… adds an unprivileged “root” account to the ‘users’ section of the OS
config.

Ludo’.

bug#55361: [Installer] Extra unprivileged “root” account added

[Ludovic Courtès]

Ludovic Courtès  skribis:

> The installer built from:
>
> Generation 214May 02 2022 21:44:14(current)
>   guix 6b588da
> repository URL: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git
> branch: master
> commit: 6b588da368c77cde82ea2f22ca315116228777ad
>
> … adds an unprivileged “root” account to the ‘users’ section of the OS
> config.

Fixed in 48c748226e2a94d2dec9bfdf84601455f00d6f5e, which reverts
c2125e59d0774cda3e559adeb056459a5f23586b.

Ludo’.

bug#55361: [Installer] Extra unprivileged “root” account added

[bokr]

Hello,

On +2022-05-21 00:19:06 +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Ludovic Courtès  skribis:
> 
> > The installer built from:
> >
> > Generation 214  May 02 2022 21:44:14(current)
> >   guix 6b588da
> > repository URL: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git
> > branch: master
> > commit: 6b588da368c77cde82ea2f22ca315116228777ad
> >
> > … adds an unprivileged “root” account to the ‘users’ section of the OS
> > config.
> 
> Fixed in 48c748226e2a94d2dec9bfdf84601455f00d6f5e, which reverts
> c2125e59d0774cda3e559adeb056459a5f23586b.
> 
> Ludo’.
> 
> 
>
--8<---cut here---start->8---
commit c2125e59d0774cda3e559adeb056459a5f23586b
Author: Mathieu Othacehe 
Date:   Mon Apr 4 16:38:09 2022 +0200

installer: user: Remove useless filtering.
--8<---cut here---end--->8---


--8<---cut here---start->8---
commit 48c748226e2a94d2dec9bfdf84601455f00d6f5e
Author: Ludovic Courtès 
Date:   Fri May 20 20:41:02 2022 +0200

Revert "installer: user: Remove useless filtering."

This reverts commit c2125e59d0774cda3e559adeb056459a5f23586b.

Fixes .
--8<---cut here---end--->8---

Assuming my date-diff hack worked:
--8<---cut here---start->8---
~/wb/guix]$ date-diff '2022-04-04 16:38:09' '2022-05-20 20:41:02'
46days 4hrs 2min 53sec
--8<---cut here---end--->8---

Is this like coming home from 46day vacation and noticing
that, oops, someone left the kitchen door open,
and hoping no ++ungoodniks noticed? Or meh?

Is. or should there be, a required signoff on an
exploitability assessment in the commit, when it
has that scent? (e.g. anything possibly opening
a door to root privilges).

Personally, I am happy to see "fixed," but I would be happier
seeing a signed exploitability assessment, esp if by someone
concentrating on that aspect of things.

Thoughts?

--
Regards,
Bengt Richter

bug#55361: [Installer] Extra unprivileged “root” account added

[Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix]

Hi bokr,

What makes this commit special?  If there's a security aspect here, what 
is it?



Personally, I am happy to see "fixed," but I would be happier
seeing a signed exploitability assessment, esp if by someone
concentrating on that aspect of things.


I don't think anyone is going to volunteer for that honour, unless you 
are :-)


Kind regards,

T G-R

Sent from a Web browser.  Excuse or enjoy my brevity.

bug#55361: [Installer] Extra unprivileged “root” account added

[Ludovic Courtès]

Hi,

b...@bokr.com skribis:

> Assuming my date-diff hack worked:
>
> ~/wb/guix]$ date-diff '2022-04-04 16:38:09' '2022-05-20 20:41:02'
> 46days 4hrs 2min 53sec
>
> Is this like coming home from 46day vacation and noticing
> that, oops, someone left the kitchen door open,
> and hoping no ++ungoodniks noticed? Or meh?

Heh.  It was a minor annoyance: the generated OS config would have an
unnecessary “root” user account (unnecessary because it’s included by
default), which ‘guix system init’ would warn about and ignore, and the
end result is unchanged.

IWBN to augment the installation tests with a check for that, but that’s
tricky.  But like Tobias wrote, contributions are welcome.  :-)

Thanks,
Ludo’.